The relative effects of Ca and Mg ions on MSC osteogenesis in the surface modification of microrough Ti implants

References

• Ma QL, Zhao LZ, Liu RR, et al. Improved implant osseointegration of a nanostructured titanium surface via mediation of macrophage polarization. Biomaterials. 2014;35:9853–9867. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.02525201737
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang G, Li J, Zhang W, et al. Magnesium ion implantation on a micro/nanostructured titanium surface promotes its bioactivity and osteogenic differentiation function. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:2387–2398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastaldi G, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Barausse C, Ippolito DR, Esposito M. Early loading of maxillary titanium implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated surface (Xpeed): 5-year results from a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10:415–424.29234748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offermanns V, Andersen OZ, Sillassen M, et al. A comparative in vivo study of strontium-functionalized and SLActiveTM implant surfaces in early bone healing. Int J Nanomed. 2018;13:2189–2197. doi:10.2147/IJN.S177627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SM, Park JW. Multifunctional effects of a modification of SLA titanium implant surface with strontium-containing nanostructures on immunoinflammatory and osteogenic cell function. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018;106:3009–3020. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.3649030192064
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sul YT, Kwon DH, Kang BS, Oh SJ, Johansson C. Experimental evidence for interfacial biochemical bonding in osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;A100(Suppl):8–19. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02355.x
   Google Scholar
• Park JW, Koh HJ, Jang JH, Kang H, Suh JY. Increased new bone formation with a surface magnesium-incorporated deproteinized porcine bone substitute in rabbit calvarial defects. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100:834–840. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.3401722241729
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li Z, Gao P, Wan P, et al. Novel bio-functional magnesium coating on porous Ti6Al4V orthopaedic implants: in vitro and in vivo study. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40755. doi:10.1038/srep4075528102294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Kim YJ, Jang JH, Park JW. Surface engineering of nanostructured titanium implants with bioactive ions. J Dent Res. 2016;95:558–565. doi:10.1177/002203451663802626961491
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park JW, An CH, Jeong SH, Suh JY. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:294–300. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02144.x21435010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park JW, Kim YJ, Park CH, et al. Enhanced osteoblast response to an equal channel angular pressing-processed pure titanium substrate with microrough surface topography. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:3272–3280. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.02919426841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries JD, Wang P, Streuli C, Geiger B, Humphries MJ, Ballestrem C. Vinculin controls focal adhesion formation by direct interactions with talin and actin. J Cell Biol. 2007;179:1043–1057. doi:10.1083/jcb.20070303618056416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Wirtz D. Focal adhesion size uniquely predicts cell migration. FASEB J. 2013;27:1351–1361. doi:10.1096/fj.12-21656423254340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komasa S, Kusumoto T, Taguchi Y, et al. Effect of nanosheet surface structure of titanium alloys on cell differentiation. J Nanomater. 2014;2014:642527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvorak MM, Siddiqua A, Ward DT, et al. Physiological changes in extracellular calcium concentration directly control osteoblast function in the absence of calciotropic hormones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:5140–5145. doi:10.1073/pnas.030614110115051872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson J, Ginebra MP, Planell J, Engel E. Osteoblast-like cellular response to dynamic changes in the ionic extracellular environment produced by calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23:2509–2520. doi:10.1007/s10856-012-4705-422729593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barradas AM, Fernandes HA, Groen N, et al. A calcium-induced signaling cascade leading to osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Biomaterials. 2012;33:3205–3215. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.02022285104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs J, Agellon LB, Michalak M. Ca2+ homeostasis and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress: an integrated view of calcium signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;460:114–121. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.00425998740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zu H, Zhao D, et al. Ion channel functional protein kinase TRPM7 regulates Mg ions to promote the osteoinduction of human osteoblast via PI3K pathway: in vitro stimulation of the bone-repairing effect of Mg-based alloy implant. Acta Biomater. 2017;63:369–382. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.05128882757
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang J, Ma XY, Feng YF, et al. Magnesium ions promotes the biological behavior of rat calvarial osteoblasts by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2017;179:284–293. doi:10.1007/s12011-017-0948-828205079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmester A, Willumeit-Romer R, Feyerabend F. Behavior of bone cells in contact with magnesium implant material. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2017;105:165–179. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.33542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Tocados JM, Herencia C, Martinez-Moreno JM, et al. Magnesium chloride promotes osteogenesis through notch signaling activation and expansion of mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7839. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08379-y28798480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu PS, Loboa EG. Cytoskeletal and focal adhesion influences on mesenchymal stem cell shape, mechanical properties, and differentiation down osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic pathways. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012;18:436–444. doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.001422741572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, McNamara LE, Gadegaard N, et al. Nanotopographical induction of osteogenesis through adhesion, bone morphogenic protein cosignaling, and regulation of microRNAs. ACS Nano. 2014;8:9941–9953. doi:10.1021/nn504767g25227207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JW, Suh JY, Chung HJ. Effects of calcium ion incorporation on osteoblast gene expression in MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on microstructured titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;86:117–126. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.3159517941022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park JW, Tustusmi Y, Lee CS, et al. Surface structures and osteoblast response of hydrothermally produced CaTiO3 thin film on Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;257:7856–7863. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JW, Kim YJ, Jang JH, Song H. Osteoblast response to magnesium ion-incorporated nanoporous titanium oxide surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:1278–1287. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01944.x20497442
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varanasi VG, Saiz E, Loomer PM, et al. Enhanced osteocalcin expression by osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1) exposed to bioactive coating glass (SiO2-CaO-P2O5-MgO-K2O-Na2O system) ions. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:3536–3547. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.02919497391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawada R, Kono K, Isama K, Haishima Y, Matsuoka A. Calcium-incorporated titanium surfaces influence the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cell. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101:2573–2585. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.3456623401369
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim SS, Chai CY, Loh HS. In vitro evaluation of osteoblast adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on chitosan-TiO2 scaffolds with Ca2+ ions. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;76:144–152. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.07528482510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MN, Hwang HS, Oh SH, et al. Elevated extracellular calcium ions promote proliferation and migration of mesenchymal stem cells via increasing osteopontin expression. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50:142. doi:10.1038/s12276-018-0170-630393382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maeno S, Niki Y, Matsumoto H, et al. The effect of calcium ion concentration on osteoblast viability, proliferation and differentiation in monolayer and 3D culture. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4847–4855. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.00615763264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Yang C, Li J, Zhu Y, Zhang X. High extracellular magnesium inhibits mineralized matrix deposition and modulates intracellular calcium signaling in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;450:1390–1395. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.05.14425010642
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshizawa S, Brown A, Barchowsky A, Sfeir C. Magnesium ion stimulation of bone marrow stromal cells enhances osteogenic activity, stimulating the effect of magnesium alloy degradation. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:2834–2842. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.00224512978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habel B, Glaser R. Human osteoblast-like cells respond not only to the extracellular calcium concentration but also to its change rate. Eur Biophys J. 1998;27:411–416. doi:10.1007/s0024900501499691471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruppke B, Heinemann C, Wagner AS, et al. Strontium ions promote in vitro human bone marrow stromal cell proliferation and differentiation in calcium-lacking media. Dev Growth Differ. 2019;61:166–175. doi:10.1111/dgd.1258830585307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park JW. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;100(SA):145–151. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02406.x
   Google Scholar
• Soltanoff CS, Chen W, Yang S, Li YP. Signaling networks that control the lineage commitment and differentiation of bone cells. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2009;19:1–46. doi:10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v19.i1.1019191755
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Song L, Liu M, Ono N, Bringhurst FR, Kronenberg HM, Guo J. Loss of wnt/β-catenin signaling causes cell fate shift of preosteoblasts from osteoblasts to adipocytes. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:2344–2358. doi:10.1002/jbmr.v27.1122729939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit S, Hatzubai A, Birman Y, et al. Axin-mediated CKI phosphorylation of beta-catenin at Ser 45: a molecular switch for the Wnt pathway. Genes Dev. 2002;16:1066–1076. doi:10.1101/gad.97990212000790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli C, Piemontese M, Lumetti S, Manfredi E, Macaluso GM, Passeri G. The importance of WNT pathways for bone metabolism and their regulation by implant topography. Eur Cell Mater. 2012;24:46–59. doi:10.22203/eCM.v024a0422791372
   PubMedGoogle Scholar