Nanostructured Titanium Implant Surface Facilitating Osseointegration from Protein Adsorption to Osteogenesis: The Example of TiO₂ NTAs

References

• Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou Z, Shi Q, Wang J, et al. The unfavorable role of titanium particles released from dental implants. Nanotheranostics. 2021;5(3):321–332. doi:10.7150/ntno.56401
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn J, McFadden R, Chan CW, Carson L. Titanium for orthopedic applications: an overview of surface modification to improve biocompatibility and prevent bacterial biofilm formation. iScience. 2020;23(11):101745. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32(8–9):762–798. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliaz N. Corrosion of metallic biomaterials: a review. Materials. 2019;12(3):407. doi:10.3390/ma12030407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager M, Jennissen HP, Dittrich F, Fischer A, Kohling HL. Antimicrobial and osseointegration properties of nanostructured titanium orthopaedic implants. Materials. 2017;10(11):1302. doi:10.3390/ma10111302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusakawa Y, Yoshida E, Hayakawa T. Protein adsorption to titanium and zirconia using a quartz crystal microbalance method. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1521593. doi:10.1155/2017/1521593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabnejad S, Johnston B, Tanzer M, Pasini D. Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-shielding following total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(8):1774–1783. doi:10.1002/jor.23445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair M, Elizabeth E. Applications of titania nanotubes in bone biology. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015;15(2):939–955. doi:10.1166/jnn.2015.9771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn TK, Lee DH, Kim TS, et al. Modification of titanium implant and titanium dioxide for bone tissue engineering. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1077:355–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awad NK, Edwards SL, Morsi YS. A review of TiO(2) NTs on Ti metal: electrochemical synthesis, functionalization and potential use as bone implants. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;76:1401–1412. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari S, Mahyad B, Hashemzadeh H, Janfaza S, Gholikhani T, Tayebi L. Biomedical applications of TiO(2) nanostructures: recent advances. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:3447–3470. doi:10.2147/IJN.S249441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra D, Gulati K, Ivanovski S. Understanding and optimizing the antibacterial functions of anodized nano-engineered titanium implants. Acta Biomater. 2021;127:80–101. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberi J, Spriano S. Titanium and protein adsorption: an overview of mechanisms and effects of surface features. Materials. 2021;14(7):1590. doi:10.3390/ma14071590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Xiao Y, Liu C. The horizon of materiobiology: a perspective on material-guided cell behaviors and tissue engineering. Chem Rev. 2017;117(5):4376–4421. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Liang H, Liu X, et al. Regulation of macrophage polarization through surface topography design to facilitate implant-to-bone osteointegration. Sci Adv. 2021;7(14):eabf6654. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf6654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Lü X, Hong Y, Xi T, Zhang D. The molecular mechanism of mediation of adsorbed serum proteins to endothelial cells adhesion and growth on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2013;34(23):5747–5758. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobles KP, Janorkar AV, Williamson RS. Surface modifications to enhance osseointegration-resulting material properties and biological responses. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2021;109(11):1909–1923. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer S, Schmuki P, von der Mark K, Park J. Engineering biocompatible implant surfaces: part I: materials and surfaces. Prog Mater Sci. 2013;58(3):261–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu AT, Xie YW, Xu JG, Li J, Wang H, He FM. Effects of strontium-incorporated micro/nano rough titanium surfaces on osseointegration via modulating polarization of macrophages. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;207:111992. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngandu Mpoyi E, Cantini M, Reynolds PM, Gadegaard N, Dalby MJ, Salmerón-Sánchez M. Protein adsorption as a key mediator in the nanotopographical control of cell behavior. ACS Nano. 2016;10(7):6638–6647. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b01649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane R, Ma PX. Mimicking the nanostructure of bone matrix to regenerate bone. Mater Today. 2013;16(11):418–423. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(8):3363–3371. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11(5):391–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma QL, Zhao LZ, Liu RR, et al. Improved implant osseointegration of a nanostructured titanium surface via mediation of macrophage polarization. Biomaterials. 2014;35(37):9853–9867. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Liao X, Fok A, Ning C, Ng P, Wang Y. Effect of crystalline phase changes in titania (TiO(2)) nanotube coatings on platelet adhesion and activation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018;82:91–101. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Zhao L, Ma Q, Wang Q, Chu PK, Zhang Y. The role of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in the effect of implant topography on MG63 differentiation. Biomaterials. 2012;33(32):7993–8002. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang S, Dong Y, et al. Effect of size and crystalline phase of TiO(2) nanotubes on cell behaviors: a high throughput study using gradient TiO(2) nanotubes. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(4):1062–1070. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wilmowsky C, Bauer S, Roedl S, Neukam FW, Schmuki P, Schlegel KA. The diameter of anodic TiO2 nanotubes affects bone formation and correlates with the bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(3):359–366. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02139.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma QL, Fang L, Jiang N, et al. Bone mesenchymal stem cell secretion of sRANKL/OPG/M-CSF in response to macrophage-mediated inflammatory response influences osteogenesis on nanostructured Ti surfaces. Biomaterials. 2018;154:234–247. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui N, Xu W, Myers DE, Shukla R, Tang HP, Qian M. The effect of ordered and partially ordered surface topography on bone cell responses: a review. Biomater Sci. 2018;6(2):250–264. doi:10.1039/C7BM01016H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöström T, Dalby MJ, Hart A, Tare R, Oreffo RO, Su B. Fabrication of pillar-like titania nanostructures on titanium and their interactions with human skeletal stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(5):1433–1441. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjostrom T, Lalev G, Mansell JP, Su B. Initial attachment and spreading of MG63 cells on nanopatterned titanium surfaces via through-mask anodization. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;257(10):4552–4558. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan HA, Hung YC, Chiou JC, Tai SM, Chen HH, Huang GS. Nanosurface design of dental implants for improved cell growth and function. Nanotechnology. 2012;23(33):335703. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/23/33/335703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverwood RK, Fairhurst PG, Sjöström T, et al. Analysis of osteoclastogenesis/osteoblastogenesis on nanotopographical titania surfaces. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(8):947–955. doi:10.1002/adhm.201500664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlin H, Contreras R, Gaskill DF, Bjursten LM, Frangos JA. Anti-inflammatory properties of micropatterned titanium coatings. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;77(1):43–49. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Li B, Han Y, Zhao L. The osteogenic capacity of biomimetic hierarchical micropore/nanorod-patterned Sr-HA coatings with different interrod spacings. Nanomedicine. 2016;12(5):1161–1173. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2016.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Yang Y, Shi J, et al. Near-infrared light II - assisted rapid biofilm elimination platform for bone implants at mild temperature. Biomaterials. 2021;269:120634. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Yu M, Wang R, et al. Hydrothermally grown TiO(2)-nanorods on surface mechanical attrition treated Ti: improved corrosion fatigue and osteogenesis. Acta Biomater. 2020;116:400–414. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su EP, Justin DF, Pratt CR, et al. Effects of titanium nanotubes on the osseointegration, cell differentiation, mineralisation and antibacterial properties of orthopaedic implant surfaces. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-b(1 Supple A):9–16. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0551.R1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu R, Wang C, Wang X, et al. Effects of hydrogenated TiO(2) nanotube arrays on protein adsorption and compatibility with osteoblast-like cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:2037–2049. doi:10.2147/IJN.S155532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai L, Zhao Y, Chen P, et al. Targeting early healing phase with titania nanotube arrays on tunable diameters to accelerate bone regeneration and osseointegration. Small. 2021;17(4):e2006287. doi:10.1002/smll.202006287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Mazare A, Schmuki P. One-dimensional titanium dioxide nanomaterials: nanotubes. Chem Rev. 2014;114(19):9385–9454. doi:10.1021/cr500061m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Necula MG, Mazare A, Ion RN, et al. Lateral spacing of TiO(2) nanotubes modulates osteoblast behavior. Materials. 2019;12(18):2956. doi:10.3390/ma12182956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Bauer S, Schlegel KA, Neukam FW, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. TiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm–an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. Small. 2009;5(6):666–671. doi:10.1002/smll.200801476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed F, Pervez SA, Aljaafari A, et al. Fabrication of TiO(2)-nanotube-array-based supercapacitors. Micromachines. 2019;10(11):742. doi:10.3390/mi10110742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spriano S, Yamaguchi S, Baino F, Ferraris S. A critical review of multifunctional titanium surfaces: new frontiers for improving osseointegration and host response, avoiding bacteria contamination. Acta Biomater. 2018;79:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Zhou P, Liu S, et al. Multi-scale surface treatments of titanium implants for rapid osseointegration: a review. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(6):1244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong Z, Hu Y, Gao F, et al. Effects of diameters and crystals of titanium dioxide nanotube arrays on blood compatibility and endothelial cell behaviors. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019;184:110521. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 2007;7(6):1686–1691. doi:10.1021/nl070678d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer KS, Oh S, Cobb CJ, Bjursten LM, Heyde Hvd JS, Jin S. Improved bone-forming functionality on diameter-controlled TiO2 nanotube surface. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(8):3215–3223. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi H, Shi M, Ni Y, et al. Size-confined effects of nanostructures on fibronectin-induced macrophage inflammation on titanium implants. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10:e2100994. doi:10.1002/adhm.202100994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Z, Liu Y, Xia R, et al. F-actin regulates osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on TiO2 nanotubes through MKL1 and YAP/TAZ. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2020;15(1):183. doi:10.1186/s11671-020-03415-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, et al. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6285620. doi:10.1155/2016/6285620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoog SA, Kumar G, Narayan RJ, Goering PL. Biological responses to immobilized microscale and nanoscale surface topographies. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;182:33–55. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach P, Eglin D, Rohde K, Perry CC. Modern biomaterials: a review - bulk properties and implications of surface modifications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(7):1263–1277. doi:10.1007/s10856-006-0064-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Lim JY, Donahue HJ, Dhurjati R, Mastro AM, Vogler EA. Influence of substratum surface chemistry/energy and topography on the human fetal osteoblastic cell line hFOB 1.19: phenotypic and genotypic responses observed in vitro. Biomaterials. 2007;28(31):4535–4550. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin DJ, Fuh LJ, Chen WC. Nano-morphology, crystallinity and surface potential of anatase on micro-arc oxidized titanium affect its protein adsorption, cell proliferation and cell differentiation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;107:110204. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo-Bastida LA, Cartmell SH. Mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts and extracellular matrix proteins: enhancing cell adhesion and differentiation for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16(4):405–412. doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saran U, Gemini Piperni S, Chatterjee S. Role of angiogenesis in bone repair. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014;561:109–117. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2014.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWhorter FY, Davis CT, Liu WF. Physical and mechanical regulation of macrophage phenotype and function. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(7):1303–1316. doi:10.1007/s00018-014-1796-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai B, Lin D, Li Y, et al. N2-polarized neutrophils guide bone mesenchymal stem cell recruitment and initiate bone regeneration: a missing piece of the bone regeneration puzzle. Adv Sci. 2021;8(19):e2100584. doi:10.1002/advs.202100584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray PJ, Allen JE, Biswas SK, et al. Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines. Immunity. 2014;41(1):14–20. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(12):958–969. doi:10.1038/nri2448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Byun H, Madhurakkat Perikamana SK, Lee S, Shin H. Current advances in immunomodulatory biomaterials for bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(4):e1801106. doi:10.1002/adhm.201801106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon OR, Browe DC, Gonzalez-Fernandez T, et al. Nano-particle mediated M2 macrophage polarization enhances bone formation and MSC osteogenesis in an IL-10 dependent manner. Biomaterials. 2020;239:119833. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondossola E, Holzapfel BM, Alexander S, Filippini S, Hutmacher DW, Friedl P. Examination of the foreign body response to biomaterials by nonlinear intravital microscopy. Nat Biomed Eng. 2016;1:0007. doi:10.1038/s41551-016-0007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotchkiss KM, Clark NM, Olivares-Navarrete R. Macrophage response to hydrophilic biomaterials regulates MSC recruitment and T-helper cell populations. Biomaterials. 2018;182:202–215. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuhn H, Blanco CE, Desai TA. Nanoengineered stent surface to reduce in-stent restenosis in vivo. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(23):19677–19686. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b04626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpadi KL, Chang PL, Bellis SL. Hydroxylapatite binds more serum proteins, purified integrins, and osteoblast precursor cells than titanium or steel. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;57(2):258–267. doi:10.1002/1097-4636(200111)57:2<258::AID-JBM1166>3.0.CO;2-R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szaba FM, Smiley ST. Roles for thrombin and fibrin(ogen) in cytokine/chemokine production and macrophage adhesion in vivo. Blood. 2002;99(3):1053–1059. doi:10.1182/blood.V99.3.1053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciel J, Oliveira MI, Gonçalves RM, Barbosa MA. The effect of adsorbed fibronectin and osteopontin on macrophage adhesion and morphology on hydrophilic and hydrophobic model surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(10):3669–3677. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gongadze E, Kabaso D, Bauer S, Park J, Schmuki P, Iglič A. Adhesion of osteoblasts to a vertically aligned TiO2 nanotube surface. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2013;13(2):194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI, Pearcy MJ. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. Tissue Eng. 2005;11(1–2):1–18. doi:10.1089/ten.2005.11.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang K, Xing J, Chen J, et al. A spatially varying charge model for regulating site-selective protein adsorption and cell behaviors. Biomater Sci. 2019;7(3):876–888. doi:10.1039/C8BM01158C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp F, Gittens RA, Scheideler L, et al. A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces I: theoretical and experimental aspects. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(7):2894–2906. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khudhair D, Bhatti A, Li Y, et al. Anodization parameters influencing the morphology and electrical properties of TiO2 nanotubes for living cell interfacing and investigations. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;59:1125–1142. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin DH, Shokuhfar T, Choi CK, Lee SH, Friedrich C. Wettability changes of TiO2 nanotube surfaces. Nanotechnology. 2011;22(31):315704. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/22/31/315704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiyelabegan HT, Sadroddiny E. Fundamentals of protein and cell interactions in biomaterials. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;88:956–970. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2017.01.136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visalakshan RM, MacGregor MN, Sasidharan S, et al. Biomaterial surface hydrophobicity-mediated serum protein adsorption and immune responses. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(31):27615–27623. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b09900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abitorabi MA, Pachynski RK, Ferrando RE, Tidswell M, Erle DJ. Presentation of integrins on leukocyte microvilli: a role for the extracellular domain in determining membrane localization. J Cell Biol. 1997;139(2):563–571. doi:10.1083/jcb.139.2.563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Zhang D, Bai J, et al. Adsorption of serum proteins on titania nanotubes and its role on regulating adhesion and migration of mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2020;108(11):2305–2318. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SA, Travers RJ, Morrissey JH. How it all starts: initiation of the clotting cascade. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;50(4):326–336. doi:10.3109/10409238.2015.1050550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Q, Yang Y, Zheng D, et al. Effect of construction of TiO(2) nanotubes on platelet behaviors: structure-property relationships. Acta Biomater. 2017;51:505–512. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anitua E, Sánchez M, Nurden AT, Nurden P, Orive G, Andía I. New insights into and novel applications for platelet-rich fibrin therapies. Trends Biotechnol. 2006;24(5):227–234. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herter JM, Rossaint J, Zarbock A. Platelets in inflammation and immunity. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12(11):1764–1775. doi:10.1111/jth.12730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhardt MA, Gerber I, Moshfegh C, et al. Clot-entrapped blood cells in synergy with human mesenchymal stem cells create a pro-angiogenic healing response. Biomater Sci. 2017;5(10):2009–2023. doi:10.1039/C7BM00276A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfarsi MA, Hamlet SM, Ivanovski S. The effect of platelet proteins released in response to titanium implant surfaces on macrophage pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(6):1036–1047. doi:10.1111/cid.12231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Klein T, Murray RZ, et al. Osteoimmunomodulation for the development of advanced bone biomaterials. Mater Today. 2016;19(6):304–321. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Q, Liu J, Zhang Z, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) induces the gene expression of integrin α(V)β(5) to promote macrophage M2 polarization. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(43):16572–16582. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA118.003161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Cui K, Li J, et al. Melatonin attenuates choroidal neovascularization by regulating macrophage/microglia polarization via inhibition of RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway. J Pineal Res. 2020;69(1):e12660. doi:10.1111/jpi.12660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu WP, Ding JL, Liu XL, et al. Titanium dioxide nanotubes promote M2 polarization by inhibiting macrophage glycolysis and ultimately accelerate endothelialization. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2021;9:746–757. doi:10.1002/iid3.429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Zhao Q, Yang T, Ding W, Zhao Y. Cellular metabolism and macrophage functional polarization. Int Rev Immunol. 2015;34(1):82–100. doi:10.3109/08830185.2014.969421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng RH, Zou MZ, Zheng D, et al. Nanoparticles from cuttlefish ink inhibit tumor growth by synergizing immunotherapy and photothermal therapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13(8):8618–8629. doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b02993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Coveney AP, Wu M, et al. Activation of both TLR and NOD signaling confers host innate immunity-mediated protection against microbial infection. Front Immunol. 2018;9:3082. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.03082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu TM, Nan FH, Chen KC, Wu YS. Sarcodia suieae acetyl-xylogalactan regulate RAW 264.7 macrophage NF-kappa B activation and IL-1 beta cytokine production in macrophage polarization. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19627. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56246-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D, Xie J, Fiskesund R, et al. Chloroquine modulates antitumor immune response by resetting tumor-associated macrophages toward M1 phenotype. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):873. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03225-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhatanadgit W, Toso M, Pratheepsawangwong B, Pimpin A, Srituravanich W. Titanium dioxide nanotubes of defined diameter enhance mesenchymal stem cell proliferation via JNK- and ERK-dependent up-regulation of fibroblast growth factor-2 by T lymphocytes. J Biomater Appl. 2019;33(7):997–1010. doi:10.1177/0885328218816565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adusei KM, Ngo TB, Sadtler K. T lymphocytes as critical mediators in tissue regeneration, fibrosis, and the foreign body response. Acta Biomater. 2021;133:17–33. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paavolainen O, Peuhu E. Integrin-mediated adhesion and mechanosensing in the mammary gland. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2021;114:113–125. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettiger D. Mechanical control of integrin-mediated adhesion and signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012;24(5):592–599. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2012.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Costell M, Fässler R. Integrin activation by talin, kindlin and mechanical forces. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(1):25–31. doi:10.1038/s41556-018-0234-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khrunyk YY, Belikov SV, Tsurkan MV, et al. Surface-dependent osteoblasts response to TiO(2) nanotubes of different crystallinity. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(2):320. doi:10.3390/nano10020320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Lai Y, Wu D, et al. Increased mesenchymal stem cell response and decreased staphylococcus aureus adhesion on titania nanotubes without pharmaceuticals. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:172898. doi:10.1155/2015/172898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu P, Li Y, Zhang Y, et al. High-throughput screening of rat mesenchymal stem cell behavior on gradient TiO(2) nanotubes. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(8):2804–2814. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra SK, Hanson DA, Schlaepfer DD. Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6(1):56–68. doi:10.1038/nrm1549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Guo Y, Liu R, et al. Tuning surface properties of bone biomaterials to manipulate osteoblastic cell adhesion and the signaling pathways for the enhancement of early osseointegration. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018;164:58–69. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.01.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer RS, Lam PY, Huttenlocher A, Waterman CM. Filopodia and focal adhesions: an integrated system driving branching morphogenesis in neuronal pathfinding and angiogenesis. Dev Biol. 2019;451(1):86–95. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Rabie AB. VEGF: an essential mediator of both angiogenesis and endochondral ossification. J Dent Res. 2007;86(10):937–950. doi:10.1177/154405910708601006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raines AL, Olivares-Navarrete R, Wieland M, Cochran DL, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Regulation of angiogenesis during osseointegration by titanium surface microstructure and energy. Biomaterials. 2010;31(18):4909–4917. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee PP, Cerchiari A, Desai TA. Nitinol-based nanotubular coatings for the modulation of human vascular cell function. Nano Lett. 2014;14(9):5021–5028. doi:10.1021/nl501523v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng L, Eltgroth ML, LaTempa TJ, Grimes CA, Desai TA. The effect of TiO2 nanotubes on endothelial function and smooth muscle proliferation. Biomaterials. 2009;30(7):1268–1272. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer KS, Oh S, Gallagher JO, Jin S. Enhanced cellular mobility guided by TiO2 nanotube surfaces. Nano Lett. 2008;8(3):786–793. doi:10.1021/nl072572o
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrán-Partida E, Valdéz-Salas B, Moreno-Ulloa A, et al. Improved in vitro angiogenic behavior on anodized titanium dioxide nanotubes. J Nanobiotechnology. 2017;15(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12951-017-0247-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi B, Andrukhov O, Berner S, Schedle A, Rausch-Fan X. The angiogenic behaviors of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) in co-culture with osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) on different titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2014;30(8):839–847. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Z, Ni J, Zheng K, et al. Dual effects and mechanism of TiO2 nanotube arrays in reducing bacterial colonization and enhancing C3H10T1/2 cell adhesion. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:3093–3105. doi:10.2147/IJN.S48084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh S, Daraio C, Chen LH, Pisanic TR, Fiñones RR, Jin S. Significantly accelerated osteoblast cell growth on aligned TiO2 nanotubes. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;78(1):97–103. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS, et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(7):2130–2135. doi:10.1073/pnas.0813200106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyckmans J, Luyten FP. Species specificity of ectopic bone formation using periosteum-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(8):2203–2213. doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.2203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Y, Polman M, Mohammad AF, et al. Species-independent stimulation of osteogenic differentiation induced by osteoclasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;606:149–155. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.03.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caetano-Lopes J, Canhão H, Fonseca JE. Osteoimmunology–the hidden immune regulation of bone. Autoimmun Rev. 2009;8(3):250–255. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2008.07.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar