The acceptability of nanocarriers for drug delivery in different contexts of use: perceptions of researchers and research trainees in the field of new technologies

References

• FarokhzadOCLangerRNanomedicine: developing smarter therapeutic and diagnostic modalitiesAdv Drug Deliv Rev2006581456145917070960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WagnerVDullaartABockA-KZweckAThe emerging nanomedicine landscapeNat Biotechnol200624101211121717033654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BawaRJohnsonSEmerging issues in nanomedicine and ethicsAllhoffFLinPNanotechnology and Society – Current and Emerging Ethical IssuesNew York, NYSpringer2009207223
   Google Scholar
• MoghimiMSHunterCAMurrayCJNanomedicine: current status and future prospectsFASEB J200512331133015746175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MnyusiwallaADaarASSingerPA‘Mind the gap’: science and ethics in nanotechnologyNanotechnology200314R9R13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GaskellGAllumNWagnerWGM foods and the misperception of risk perceptionRisk Anal200424118519415028010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FischhoffBSlovicPLichtensteinSReadSCombsBHow safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefitsPol Sci1978914
   Google Scholar
• SlovicPFischhoffBLichtensteinSRating the risksEnvironment197921314203639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SlovicPPerception of riskScience19872362802853563507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RocoMRennOJägerANanotechnology risk governanceRennOWalkerKGlobal Risk Governance: Concept and Practice Using the IRGC Framework1NetherlandsSpringer2008201227
   Google Scholar
• PatenaudeJLegaultGABeauvaisJFramework for the analysis of nanotechnologies’ impacts and ethical acceptability: basis of an interdisciplinary approach to assessing novel technologiesSci Eng Ethics2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScheufeleDALewensteinBVThe public and nanotechnology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologiesJ Nanopart Res20057659667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurriRVBellucciSPublic perception of nanotechnologyJ Nanopart Res2008103387391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CobbMDMacoubrieJPublic perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trustJ Nanopart Res20046395405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BainbridgeWSPublic attitudes toward nanotechnologyJ Nanopart Res20024561570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KahanDMSlovicPBramanDGastilJCohenGNanotechnology Risk Perceptions: The Influence of Affect and Values2007Report conducted by the Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School
   Google Scholar
• NerlichBClarkeDDUlphFRisks and benefits of nanotechnology: how young adults perceive possible advances in nanomedicine compared with conventional treatmentsHealth Risk Soc200792159171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BottiniMRosatoNGloriaFPublic optimism toward nanomedecineInt J Nanomedicine201163473348522267931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SechiGBedognettiDSgarrellaFThe perception of nanotechnology and nanomedicine: a worldwide social media studyNanomedicine (London)201491014751486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BerubeDMThe public acceptance of nanomedicine: a personal perspectiveWiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol200912520049773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SylvesterDJAbbottKWMarchantGENot again! Public perception, regulation, and nanotechnologyRegul Governance20093165185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CorleyEAKimYScheufeleDALeading US nanoscientists’ perceptions about media coverage and the public communication of scientific research findingsJ Nanopart Res20111370417055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CobbMDFraming effects on public opinion about nanotechnologySci Commun2005272221239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SatterfieldTContiJHarthornBHPidgeonNPittsAUnderstanding shifting perceptions of nanotechnologies and their implications for policy dialogues about emerging technologiesSci Public Policy201340247260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• te KulveHKonradKPalavicinoCAWalhoutBContext matters: promises and concerns regarding nanotechnologies for water and food applicationsNanoethics201371727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuptaNSajiGFischerARHFrewerLJExpert views on societal responses to different applications of nanotechnology: a comparative analysis of experts in countries with different economic and regulatory environmentsJ Nanopart Res2013151838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiegristMKellerCWiekAFreySKastenholzHLaypeople’s and experts’ perception of nanotechnology hazardsRisk Anal2007271596917362400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BesleyJCKramerVLPriestSHExpert opinion on nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and regulationJ Nanopart Res200810549558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PowellMCNew risk or old risk, high risk or no risk? How scientists’ standpoints shape their nanotechnology risk framesHealth Risk Soc20079218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlthausCEA disciplinary perspective on the epistemological status of riskRisk Anal200525356758816022691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva CostaHSetheSPêgoAPOlssonASScientists’ perception of ethical issues in nanomedicine: a case studyNanomedicine (London)201164681691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CreswellJWResearch Design – Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches3rd edThousand Oaks, CASAGE Publications2009
   Google Scholar
• DavisFDPerceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologyMIS Q1989133319340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WillisBGCognitive Interviewing – A Tool for Improving Questionnaire DesignThousand Oaks, CASAGE2005
   Google Scholar
• NetWorkNLNE³LS – Network Overview2014 Available from: http://www.ne3ls.ca/ne3ls-overview/?lang=enAccessed October 29, 2014
   Google Scholar
• PACTEPacte – Social Science Research Laboratory2014 Available from: http://www.pacte-grenoble.fr/english/Accessed October 29, 2014
   Google Scholar
• GreenacreMCorrespondance Analysis in PracticeBoca Raton, FLTaylor & Francis Group2007
   Google Scholar
• ChaudhryQSannerTvan EngelenJGuidance on the Safety Assessement of Nanomaterials in CosmeticsBrussels, BelgiumScientific Committee on Consumer Safety6272012
   Google Scholar
• FDAGuidance for Industry – Safety of Nanomaterials in Cosmetic ProductsU.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition62014
   Google Scholar
• SiegristMCousinM-ÈKastenholzHWiekAPublic acceptance of nanotechnology food and food packaging: the influence of affect and trustAppetite20074945946617442455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VenkateshVBalaHTechnology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventionsDecision Sciences2008392273315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DavisFDA Technology Acceptance Model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and resultsCambridgeManagement Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology1985
   Google Scholar
• HoldenRJKarshB-TThe Technology Acceptance Model: its past and its future in health careJ. Biomed. Inf201043159172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PautlerMBrennerSNanomedicine: promises and challenges for the future of public healthInternational Journal of Nanomedicine2010580380921042425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar