Electrochemical growth behavior, surface properties, and enhanced in vivo bone response of TiO₂ nanotubes on microstructured surfaces of blasted, screw-shaped titanium implants

References

• ZwillingVAucouturierMDarque-CerettiEAnodic oxidation of titanium and TA6V alloy in chromic media. An electrochemical approachElectrochimi Acta1999456921929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GhicovASchmukiPSelf-ordering electrochemistry: a review on growth and functionality of TiO2 nanotubes and other self-aligned MO(x) structuresChem Commun20092027912808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacakJMTsuchiyaHGhicovATiO2 nanotubes: Self-organized electrochemical formation, properties and applicationsCurr Opin Solid State Mater Sci2007111–2318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorGKVargheseOKPauloseMShankarKGrimesCAA review on highly ordered, vertically oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: Fabrication, material properties, and solar energy applicationsSol Energy Mater Sol Cells2006901420112075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenXMaoSSTitanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, modifications, and applicationsChem Rev200710772891295917590053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YaoCWebsterTJAnodization: a promising nano-modification technique of titanium implants for orthopedic applicationsJ Nanosci Nanotechnol200669–102682269217048475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChristensonEMAnsethKSvan den BeuckenJJNanobiomaterial applications in orthopedicsJ Orthop Res2007251112217048259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VariolaFVetroneFRichertLImproving biocompatibility of implantable metals by nanoscale modification of surfaces: an overview of strategies, fabrication methods, and challengesSmall200959996100619360718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTJohanssonCWennerbergAOptimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structureInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants200520334935915973946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTJohanssonCBJeongYAlbrektssonTThe electrochemical oxide growth behaviour on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytesMed Eng Phys200123532934611435147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTJohanssonCBPetronisSCharacteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical compositionBiomaterials200223249150111761170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTModified oxideUS Patent7291,178. 2007
   Google Scholar
• SulYTOsseoinductive magnesium-titanate implant and method of manufacturing the sameUS Patent7,452,566. 2008
   Google Scholar
• SulYTJohanssonCBJeongYOxidized implants and their influence on the bone responseJ Mater Sci Mater Med20011210–121025103115348359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTJohanssonCBJeongYWennerbergAAlbrektssonTResonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxidesClin Oral Implants Res200213325225912010155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTJohanssonCBRoserKAlbrektssonTQualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implantsBiomaterials20022381809181711950051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTJohanssonCBKangYJeonDGAlbrektssonTBone reactions to oxidized titanium implants with electrochemical anion sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid incorporationClin Implant Dent Relat Res200242788712121607
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SulYTJohanssonCBAlbrektssonTOxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit boneInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants200217562563412381062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTThe significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implantBiomaterials200324223893390712834584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTJeongYJohanssonCAlbrektssonTOxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1 – experimental implantsClin Oral Implants Res200617552152616958691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTJohanssonCAlbrektssonTWhich surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfacesInt J Prosthodont200619431932816900812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTKangBSJohanssonCThe roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in boneJ Biomed Mater Res Part A2009894942950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTJohanssonCByonEAlbrektssonTThe bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implantsBiomaterials200526336720673015975649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTJohanssonCAlbrektssonTA novel in vivo method for quantifying the interfacial biochemical bond strength of bone implantsJ R Soc Interface2009424 [Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von WilmowskyCBauerSLutzRIn vivo evaluation of anodic TiO2 nanotubes: an experimental study in the pigJ Biomed Mater Res Part B2009891165171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PopatKCLeary SwanEEMukhatyarVInfluence of nanoporous alumina membranes on long-term osteoblast responseBiomaterials200526224516452215722120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkJBauerSvon der MarkKSchmukiPNanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fateNano Lett2007761686169117503870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OhSBrammerKSLiYSStem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimensionProc Natl Acad Sci U S A200910672130213519179282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkJBauerSSchlegelKATiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm – an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiationSmall20095666667119235196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurnsKYaoCWebsterTJIncreased chondrocyte adhesion on nanotubular anodized titaniumJ Biomed Mater Res Part A2009883561568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der MarkKBauerSParkJSchmukiPAnother look at “Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension”Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A200910624E60; author reply E6119506261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OhSBrammerKSLiYSReply to von der Mark et al: Looking further into the effects of nanotube dimension on stem cell fateProc Natl Acad Sci U S A20091067E61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DonathKBreunerGA method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) techniqueJ Oral Pathol19821143183266809919
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BauerSKleberSSchmukiPTiO2 nanotubes: Tailoring the geometry in H3PO4/HF electrolytesElectrochem Commun20068813211325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YasudaKSchmukiPControl of morphology and composition of self-organized zirconium titanate nanotubes formed in (NH4)2SO4/NH4F electrolytesElectrochim Acta2007521240534061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrakasamHEShankarKPauloseMVargheseOKGrimesCAA new benchmark for TiO2 nanotube array growth by anodizationJ Phys Chem C20071112072357241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTByonESJeongYBiomechanical measurements of calcium-incorporated oxidized implants in rabbit bone: effect of calcium surface chemistry of a novel implantClin Implant Dent Relat Res20046210111015669710
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• YuJCYuJHoWJiangZZhangLEffects of F-doping on the photocatalytic activity and microstructures of nanocrystalline TiO2 powdersChem Mater200214938083816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YamakiTSumitaTYamamotoSFormation of TiO2–xFx compounds in fluorine-implanted TiO2J Mater Sci Lett20022113335
   Google Scholar
• LiDHanedaHLabhsetwarNKHishitaSOhashiNVisible-light-driven photocatalysis on fluorine-doped TiO2 powders by the creation of surface oxygen vacanciesChem Phys Lett200540146579584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DelplanckeJLWinandRGalvanostatic anodization of titanium – I. Structures and compositions of the anodic filmsElectrochim Acta1988331115391549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BestettiMFranzSCuzzolinMArosioPCavallottiPLStructure of nanotubular titanium oxide templates prepared by electrochemical anodization in H2SO4/HF solutionsThin Solid Films20075151352535258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KubotaSJohkuraKAsanumaKTitanium oxide nanotubes for bone regenerationJ Mater Sci Mater Med20041591031103515448411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WennerbergAAlbrektssonTJohanssonCAnderssonBExperimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topographyBiomaterials199617115228962942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuserDNydeggerTOxlandTInterface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigsJ Biomed Mater Res Part A19994527583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RonoldHJEllingsenJEEffect of micro-roughness produced by TiO2 blasting – tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implantsBiomaterials200223214211421912194524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShalabiMMGortemakerAVan’t HofMAJansenJACreugersNHImplant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic reviewJ Dent Res200685649650016723643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooperLFZhouYTakebeJFluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implantsBiomaterials200627692693616112191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SulYTJorgenJYoonGSJohanssonCBResonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface characteristics of microstructured titanium implants: Magnesium-incorporated, micro-patterned and magnesium-incorporated, TiUnite®, Osseotite®, SLA® and TiOblast® implantsClin Oral Implants Res2009201146115519719742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar