86
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The effects of hierarchical micro/nanosurfaces decorated with TiO2 nanotubes on the bioactivity of titanium implants in vitro and in vivo

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 6955-6973 | Published online: 09 Nov 2015

References

  • AnselmeKOsteoblast adhesion on biomaterialsBiomaterials200021766768110711964
  • HanssonSNortonMThe relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical modelJ Biomech199932882983610433425
  • Dohan EhrenfestDMCoelhoPGKangBSSulYTAlbrektssonTClassification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topographyTrends Biotechnol201028419820620116873
  • PalmquistAOmarOMEspositoMLausmaaJThomsenPTitanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcomeJ R Soc Interface20107suppl 5S515S52720591849
  • KimHChoiSHRyuJJKohSYParkJHLeeISThe biocompatibility of SLA-treated titanium implantsBiomed Mater20083225011
  • YangGLHeFMYangXFWangXXZhaoSFBone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit modelOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod2008106451652418602288
  • CochranDLBuserDten BruggenkateCMThe use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implantsClin Oral Implants Res200213214415311952734
  • KimMJKimCWLimYJHeoSJMicrorough titanium surface affects biologic response in MG63 osteoblast-like cellsJ Biomed Mater Res A20067941023103217034031
  • LohmannCHBonewaldLFSiskMAMaturation state determines the response of osteogenic cells to surface roughness and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3J Bone Miner Res20001561169118010841186
  • BoyanBDLossdörferSWangLOsteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographiesEur Cell Mater20036222714577052
  • SchwartzZOlivares-NavarreteRWielandMCochranDLBoyanBDMechanisms regulating increased production of osteoprotegerin by osteoblasts cultured on microstructured titanium surfacesBiomaterials200930203390339619395022
  • LiuHWebsterTJNanomedicine for implants: a review of studies and necessary experimental toolsBiomaterials200728235436921898921
  • GaoLFengBWangJMicro/nanostructural porous surface on titanium and bioactivityJ Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater200989233534118837457
  • FanHChenPQiRGreatly improved blood compatibility by microscopic multiscale design of surface architecturesSmall20095192144214819565617
  • BjurstenLMRasmussonLOhSSmithGCBrammerKSJinSTitanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivoJ Biomed Mater Res A20109231218122419343780
  • ParkJBauerSvon der MarkKSchmukiPNanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fateNano Lett2007761686169117503870
  • ParkJBauerSSchmukiPvon der MarkKNarrow window in nanoscale dependent activation of endothelial cell growth and differentiation on TiO2 nanotube surfacesNano Lett2009993157316419653637
  • ParkJBauerSSchlegelKANeukamFWvon der MarkKSchmukiPTiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm – an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiationSmall20095666667119235196
  • OhSBrammerKSLiYSStem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimensionProc Natl Acad Sci U S A200910672130213519179282
  • BrammerKSOhSCobbCJBjurstenLMvan der HeydeHJinSImproved bone-forming functionality on diameter-controlled TiO2 nanotube surfaceActa Biomater2009583215322319447210
  • BrammerKSOhSGallagherJOJinSEnhanced cellular mobility guided by TiO2 nanotube surfacesNano Lett20088378679318251515
  • ZhaoLMeiSChuPKZhangYWuZThe influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functionsBiomaterials201031195072508220362328
  • LiuXLiXLiSAn in vitro study of a titanium surface modified by simvastatin-loaded titania nanotubes-micellesJ Biomed Nanotechnol201410219420424738328
  • XiaoJZhouHZhaoLThe effect of hierarchical micro/nanosurface titanium implant on osseointegration in ovariectomized sheepOsteoporos Int20112261907191320878388
  • KuboKTsukimuraNIwasaFCellular behavior on TiO2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy modelBiomaterials200930295319532919589591
  • LiSNiJLiuXSurface characteristics and biocompatibility of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface modified by ultraviolet irradiation: an in vitro study[J]J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater201210061587159822707456
  • GongDWGrimesCAVargheseOKTitanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidationJ Mater Res2001161233313334
  • DingXYangXZhouLTitanate nanowire scaffolds decorated with anatase nanocrystals show good protein adsorption and low cell adhesion capacityInt J Nanomedicine2013856957923430236
  • YunKDParkSWLeeKMTitanium dioxide nanotube modified implants: an animal study on bone formationJ Nanosci Nanotechnol20131363864386723862419
  • StadlingerBBierbaumSGrimmerSIncreased bone formation around coated implantsJ Clin Periodontol200936869870419531092
  • CoelhoPGMarinCGranatoRGiroGSuzukiMBonfanteEABiomechanical and histologic evaluation of non-washed resorbable blasting media and alumina-blasted/acid-etched surfacesClin Oral Implants Res201223113213521435012
  • CooperLFMasudaTYliheikkilaPKFeltonDAGeneralizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studiesInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants1998131631749581401
  • MasudaTYliheikkilaPKFeltonDACooperLFGeneralizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studiesInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants19981317299509776
  • WennerbergAAlbrektssonTOn implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinionsInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants201025637420209188
  • WennerbergAAlbrektssonTEffects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic reviewClin Oral Implants Res200920suppl 417218419663964
  • MendoncaGMendoncaDBAragaoFJCooperLFAdvancing dental implant surface technology e from micron- to nanotopographyBiomaterials2008293822383518617258
  • SatoMWebsterTJNanobiotechnology: implications for the future of nanotechnology in orthopedic applicationsExpert Rev Med Dev20041105114
  • SaitoTHayashiHKameyamaTSuppressed proliferation of mouse osteoblast-like cells by a rough-surfaced substrate leads to low differentiation and mineralizationMater Sci Eng C20103017
  • BadamiASKrekeMRThompsonMSRiffleJSGoldsteinASEffect of fiber diameter on spreading, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblastic cells on electrospun poly (lactic acid) substratesBiomaterials200627459660616023716
  • BiggsMJRichardsRGGadegaardNWilkinsonCDDalbyMJRegulation of implant surface cell adhesion: characterization and quantification of S-phase primary osteoblast adhesions on biomimetic nanoscale substratesJ Orthop Res200725227328217106874
  • DalbyMJBiggsMJGadegaardNKalnaGWilkinsonCDCurtisASGNanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioningJ Cell Biochem200710032633816888806
  • DalbyMJGadegaardNHerzykPNanomechanotransduction and interphase nuclear organization influence on genomic controlJ Cell Biochem20071021234124417427951
  • PuleoDANanciAUnderstanding and controlling the bone–implant interfaceBiomaterials1999202311232110614937
  • PilliarRMCementless implant fixation – toward improved reliabilityOrthop Clin North Am20053611311915542130