References
- BetránAPYeJMollerABZhangJGülmezogluAMTorloniMRThe increasing trend in Caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014PLoS One2016112e014834326849801
- MylonasIFrieseKIndications for and risks of elective cesarean sectionDtsch Arztebl Int201511229–3048926249251
- DahlkeJDMendez-FigueroaHRouseDJBerghellaVBaxterJKChauhanSPEvidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic reviewAm J Obstet Gynecol2013209429430623467047
- GüngördükKYildirimGArkCIs routine cervical dilatation necessary during elective caesarean section? A randomised controlled trialAust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol200949326326719566557
- AhmedBAbu NahiaFAbushamaMRoutine cervical dilatation during elective cesarean section and its influence on maternal morbidity: a randomized controlled studyJ Perinat Med200533651051316318613
- LiabsuetrakulTPeeyananjarassriKMechanical dilatation of the cervix at non-labour cesarean section for reducing postoperative morbidityCochrane Database Syst Rev201111CD008019
- NajiOAbdallahYBij de VaateAJStandardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonographyUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201239325225921858885
- YaziciogluFGökdoganAKelekciSAygünMSavanKIncomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: is it preventable?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol20061241323616023780
- PoidevinLOThe value of hysterography in the prediction of cesarean section wound defectsAm J Obstet Gynecol1961811677113736585
- BurgerNFDarazsBBoesEGAn echographic evaluation during the early puerperium of the uterine wound after caesarean sectionJ Clin Ultrasound19821062712746811618
- ChenHYChenSJHsiehFJObservation of cesarean section scar by transvaginal ultrasonographyUltrasound Med Biol19901654434472238250
- JastrowNAntonelliERobyrRIrionOBoulvainMInter- and intraobserver variability in sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment after a previous Cesarean sectionUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200627442042416526096
- MartinsWPBarraDAGallarretaFMNastriCOFilhoFMLower uterine segment thickness measurement in pregnant women with previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis using two- and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasoundUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200933330130619148891
- Shehata DawoodADawoodASDawoodAGEl-ShwaikhSLA three year retrospective study of Caesarean section rate at Tanta University HospitalsJ Gynecol Obstet2017522530
- BollapragadaSSEdozienLCApparent absence of lochia after elective caesarean sectionJ Obstet Gynaecol200222555812521434
- ShermanDLurieSBetzerMPinhasiYArieliSBoldurIUterine flora at cesarean and its relationship to postpartum endometritisObstet Gynecol1999945 Pt 178779110546730
- TosunMSakinciMÇelikHA randomized controlled study investigating the necessity of routine cervical dilatation during elective cesarean sectionArch Gynecol Obstet20112841858920677024
- OsemwenkhaAOlagbujiBNEzeanochieMCA comparative study on routine cervical dilatation at elective cesarean sectionAfr J Med Health Sci2013127881
- EzegwuiHUOgbuefiFCRoutine cervical dilatation during elective caesarean sectionShould we continue? J Obstet Gynaecol201535215015225057991
- KirschtJWeissCNickolJDilatation or no dilatation of the cervix during cesarean section (Dondi Trial): a randomized controlled trialArch Gynecol Obstet20172951394327581586
- SakinciMKuruOOlganSDilatation of the cervix at non-labour caesarean section: Does it improve the patients’ perception of pain post-operatively?J Obstet Gynaecol201535768168425642600
- KoifmanAHarlevASheinerEPressFWiznitzerARoutine cervical dilatation during elective cesarean delivery – Is it really necessary?J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med200922760861119350445
- DosedlaECaldaPCan the final sonographic assessment of the cesarean section scar be predicted 6 weeks after the operation?Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol201655571872027751422
- HamarBDSaberSBCackovicMUltrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean deliveryObstet Gynecol2007110480881317906013
- SevketOAtesSMollaTOzkalFUysalODansukRHydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean deliveryInt J Gynaecol Obstet2014125321922224680843
- GlavindJMadsenLDUldbjergNDueholmMUltrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort studyUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201342220721223288683