136
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case report

Recurrent Molar in Five Consecutive Pregnancies – A Case Report

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 171-174 | Published online: 09 Mar 2020

References

  • Wolf NG, Lage JM. Genetic analysis of gestational trophoblastic disease; A review. Semin Oncol. 1995;22:113–118.
  • Lawler SD, Fisher RA, Dent J. A prospective study of complete and partial hydatidiform moles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:1270–1277. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(91)90698-Q
  • Lawler SD, Fisher RA, Pickthall VJ, Povey S, Evans MW. Genetic studies on hydatidiform moles I: the origin of partial moles. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1985;5:309–320. doi:10.1016/0165-4608(82)90096-6
  • Daftary SN, Padubidri VG. Trophoblastic diseases. In: Padubidri VG, Daftary SN, editors. Shaw’s Textbook of Gynaecology. 13th ed. New Delhi: Elsevier India, Ltd.; 2004:248–259.
  • Bagshawe KD, Dent J, Webb J. Hydatidiform mole in England and Wales 1973-83. Lancet. 1986;2:673–677. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90179-0
  • Eagles N, Sebire NJ, Short D, Savage PM, Seckl MJ, Fisher RA. Risk of recurrent molar pregnancies following complete and partial hydatidiform moles. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2055–2063. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev169
  • Sebire NJ, Foskett RA, Fisher RA, Rees H, Seckl M, Newlands E. Risk of partial and complete hydatidiform molar pregnancy in relationship to age. BJOG. 2002;109:99–102. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.t01-1-01037.x
  • Murdoch S, Djuric U, Mazhar B, et al. Mutations in NALP7 cause recurrent hydatidiform moles and reproductive wastage in humans. Nat Genet. 2006;38:300–302. doi:10.1038/ng1740
  • Parry DA, Logan CV, Hayward BE, et al. Mutations causing familial biparental hydatidiform mole implicate c6orf221 as a possible regulator of genomic imprinting in the human oocyte. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;89:451–458. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.08.002
  • Van Der Smagt JJ, Scheenjes E, Kremer JA, Hennekam FA, Fisher RA. Heterogeneity in the origin of recurrent complete hydatidiform moles: not all women with multiple molar pregnancies have biparental moles. BJOG. 2006;113:725–728. doi:10.1111/bjo.2006.113.issue-6
  • Al-hussaini TK, Abd El-Aal DM, Den Veyver IB. Recurrent pregnancy loss due to familial and non-familial habitual molar pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83:179–186. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00209-1
  • Madhudas C, Khursheed F, Srichand P. Analysis of patients with recurrent molar pregnancy. Eur J Biol Sci. 2011;3:102–104.
  • Marakani LR, Gundabattula SR. Recurrent molar pregnancy: an obstetric dilemma? Int J Infertility Fetal Med. 2012;3:63–64. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10016-1043
  • Savage P, Williams J, Wong SL, et al. The demographics of molar pregnancies in England and Wales from 2000–2009. J Reprod Med. 2010;55:341–345.