Evaluation of the Cesarean Scar Niche In Women With Secondary Infertility Undergoing ICSI Using 2D Sonohysterography Versus 3D Sonohysterography and Setting a Standard Criteria; Alalfy Simple Rules for Scar Assessment by Ultrasound To Prevent Health Problems for Women

References

• Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO working group on caesarean section WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2015;123(5):667–670. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naji O, Abdallah Y, et al. Cesarean birth: surgical techniques glob libr women’s med. 2010. doi:10.3843/GLOWM.10133.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, et al. Consortium on safe labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1281–1287. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG/SMFM Obstetric Care Consensus. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:693–711. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naji O. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:252–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastani P, Pourabolghasem S, Abbasalizadeh F, Motvalli L. Comparison of neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with head-pushing and head-pulling methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118(1):1. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennich G, Rudnicki M, Wilken-Jensen C, Lousen T, Lassen PD, Wøjdemann K. Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a Cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:417–422. doi:10.1002/uog.15792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bij de Vaate AJ, Brolmann HA, van der Voet LF. Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:93–99. doi:10.1002/uog.8864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bij de Vaate AJ, van Der, Voet LF, Naji O. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:372–382. doi:10.1002/uog.13199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse DJ, Berghella V, Baxter K. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(4):294. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tower AM, Frishman GN. Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(05):562–572. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:525–532. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318209abf0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DHS program—demographic and health surveys: USAID; [cited 2015 23 March. 2015]. Available: http://dhsprogram.com/. Accessed 23 March 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(4):331e119. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurol-Urganci I, Bou Antoun S, Lim CP, Cromwell DA, Mahmood TA, Templeton A. Impact of Cesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1943–1952. doi:10.1093/humrep/det130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I. The prevalence of urinary incontinence 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or cesarean delivery. BJOG. 2013;120(2):144. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03301.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, de Graaf IM, B W M, Pajkrt E. The ability of sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labour in women with a previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:132–139. doi:10.1002/uog.12479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller ES, Hahn K, Grobman WA. Society for maternal-fetal medicine health policy committee. Consequences of a primary elective cesarean delivery across the reproductive life. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(4):789. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182878b43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejub B, Vesna B-C, Hadzo K. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after cesarean section. Acta Inform Med. 2012;20(3):149–153. doi:10.5455/aim.2012.20.149-153
   Google Scholar
• Jastrow N, Chaillet N, Roberge S, Morency AM, Lacasse Y, Bujold E. Sonographic lower segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Canada. 2010;32(4):321–327
   Google Scholar
• Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, Brölmann HA, Mol BW. Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2695–2702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjolein AJ, Bij de Vaate IH, Linskens Lucet F. Huirne Reproducibility of three - dimensional ultrasound for the measurement of a niche in a cesarean scar and assessment of its shape.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;188:39–44. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.018
   Google Scholar
• Salim R, Jurkovic D. Assessing congenital uterine anomalies: the role of threedimensional ultrasonography. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;18(1):29–36. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2003.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(5):415–429. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pundir J, Toukhy TE. Uterine cavity assessment prior to IVF Women’s Health (Lond). 2010;6(6):841–848 doi:10.2217/whe.10.61.PMID:21118042.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed SM, Anyona AA, Onyambu CK, Muriithi IM, Mutala TM. Utility of sonohysterography in evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2018;2(2):1–7. doi:10.15761/OGR.1000127
   Google Scholar
• Di Spiezio Sardo A, Zizolfi B, Calagna G. Hysteroscopic isthmoplasty: step-by-step technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:338–339. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnez O, Donnez J, Orellana R, Dolmans MM. Gynecological and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic repair of a cesarean scar defect in a series of 38 women. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:289–296. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Voet LF, Vervoort AJ, Veersema S, BijdeVaate AJ, Brölmann HA, Huirne JA. Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: a systematic review. BJOG. 2014;121:145–156. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganà AS, Pacheco LA, Tinelli A, et al. Optimal timing and recommended route of delivery after hysteroscopic management of isthmocele? A consensus statement from the global congress on hysteroscopy scientific committee. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(4):558. doi:doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganà AS, Alonso Pacheco L, Tinelli A, Haimovich S, Carugno J, Ghezzi F. Authors’ Reply. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(6):1112–1113. doi:doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimondo G, Grifone G, Raimondo D, Seracchioli R, Scambia G, Masciullo V. Hysteroscopic treatment of symptomatic cesareaninduced isthmocele: a prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:297–301. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganà AS, Ciancimino L, Mancuso A, Chiofalo B, Rizzo P, Triolo O. 3D sonohysterography vs hysteroscopy: a cross-sectional study for the evaluation of endouterine diseases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(6):1173–1178. doi:doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3366-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso Pacheco L, Laganà AS, Ghezzi F, Haimovich S, Azumendi Gómez P, Carugno J. Subtypes of T-shaped uterus. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(2):399–400. doi:doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso Pacheco L, Laganà AS, Garzon S, Pérez Garrido A, Flores Gornés A, Ghezzi F. Hysteroscopic outpatient metroplasty for T-shaped uterus in women with reproductive failure: results from a large prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;243:173–178. doi:doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar