Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study

References

• James AH, Jamison MG, Brancazio LR, Myers ER. Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period: incidence, risk factors, and mortality. Am J Obstetric Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1311–1315. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James AH. Pregnancy and thrombotic risk. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:57–63. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c9e2bb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munnur U, de Boisblanc B, Suresh MS. Airway problems in pregnancy. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:259–268. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000183502.45419.c9
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella SM, Lohmann G. Supine hypotensive syndrome. Obstetric Gynecol. 1994;83:774–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella SM, Walton B, Sashidharan R, et al. Category-1 caesarean section: a survey of anaesthetic and peri-operative management in the UK. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:362–368. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devroe S, Van de Velde M, Rex S. General anesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28(3):240–246. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley ET, Cohen SE, Macario A, Desai JB, Ratner EF. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of time efficiency, costs, charges, and complications. Anesth Analg. 1995;80(4):709–712. doi:10.1097/00000539-199504000-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fettes PD, Jansson JR, Wildsmith JA. Failed spinal anaesthesia: mechanisms, management, and prevention. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(6):739–748. doi:10.1093/bja/aep096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Herbst MA, Meyers JA, Hankins GD. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. Am J Obstetric Gynecol. 2008;199(1):36 e1–5; discussion 91–2, e7–11. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenstein AMD, Tully GMD, Thurer RMD. Accurate assessment of blood loss during cesarean delivery improves estimate of postoperative hemoglobin [17B]. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:p 23S–24S. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000532919.12355.64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conly BMD, Sylla RMD, Lee KMD, Wei JMPH. Improved estimation of blood loss at time of cesarean section using a quantitative approach [28M]. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(5 – p S140). doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000514699.18738.76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksoy H, Ü A, Yücel B, et al. Blood loss in elective cesarean section: is there a difference related to the type of anesthesia? A randomized prospective study. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015;16(3):158–163. doi:10.5152/jtgga.2015.15034
   Google Scholar
• Schewe JC, Komusin A, Zinserling J, Nadstawek J, Hoeft A, Hering R. Effects of spinal anaesthesia versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section on postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26(1):52–59. doi:10.1097/EJA.0b013e328318c639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saracoglu KT, Saracoglu A, Umuroglu T, Eti Z. Neuraxial block versus general anaesthesia for cesarean section: post-operative pain scores and analgesic requirements. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62(5):441–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Aish KA, Tafish R, Zourob H. Morphine versus fentanyl for spinal post-caesarean analgesia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;21(391 Suppl 2):S20. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30386-6
   Google Scholar
• Kim WH, Hur M, Park SK, et al. Comparison between general, spinal, epidural, and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a network meta-analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;37:5–15. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer RA, Els I, Farbas J, Torr GJ, Schoeman LK, James MF. Prospective, randomized trial comparing general with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in preeclamptic patients with a nonreassuring fetal heart trace. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(3):561–569. doi:10.1097/00000542-200309000-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edipoglu IS, Celik F, Marangoz EC, Orcan GH. Effect of anaesthetic technique on neonatal morbidity in emergency caesarean section for foetal distress. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207388. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafish R, KIA EA, Madi W. General versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a quasi-controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;21(391 Suppl 2):S33. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30399-4
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda T, Kato A, Bougaki M, et al. A retrospective review of 10-year trends in general anesthesia for cesarean delivery at a university hospital: the impact of a newly launched team on obstetric anesthesia practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:421. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05314-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho B, Butwick AJ. Postcesarean delivery analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017;31(1):69–79. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Liu W, Gong X, Cheng Q. Comparison of effects of general anesthesia and combined spinal/epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery on umbilical cord blood gas values: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Med Sci Monit. 2019;16(25):5272–5279. doi:10.12659/MSM.914160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffari S, Dehghanpisheh L, Tavakkoli F, Mahmoudi H. The effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on quality of life in women undergoing cesarean delivery on maternal request. Cureus. 2018;11(10):12:e3715. doi:10.7759/cureus.3715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintu A, Abdulla S, Lubikire A, et al. Postoperative pain after cesarean section: assessment and management in a tertiary hospital in a low-income country. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):68. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-3911-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch T, Seipel SJ, Coyle N, Ortega KH, DeJesus O. Postoperative visual analog pain scores and overall anesthesia patient satisfaction. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2017;29(4):419–426. doi:10.1016/j.cnc.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar