636
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Decision to Delivery Interval, Fetal Outcomes and Its Factors Among Emergency Caesarean Section Deliveries at South Gondar Zone Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study, 2020

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 395-403 | Published online: 28 Apr 2021

References

  • O’Neill KM, Greenberg SL, Cherian M, et al. Bellwether procedures for monitoring and planning essential surgical care in low- and middle-income countries: caesarean delivery, laparotomy, and treatment of open fractures. World J Surg. 2016;40(11):2611–2619. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3614-y
  • Bishop D, Dyer RA, Maswime S, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after caesarean delivery in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(4):e513–e522. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30036-1
  • Tunçalp O, Were W, MacLennan C, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns - the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1045–1049. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13451
  • Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, Holdcroft A, May AE, Wee M. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J Royal Soc Med. 2000;93(7):346–350. doi:10.1177/014107680009300703
  • Rashid N, Nalliah S. Understanding the decision-delivery interval in cesarean birth. IeJSME. 2007;1(2):61–68.
  • Andisha E. Decision-to-delivery an anaesthetic perspective. Sch Clin Med Discipline Anesthesiol Critical Care. 2018. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1927-3
  • Chukwudi OE, Okonkwo CA. Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(5):946–950. doi:10.12669/pjms.305.5470
  • Ethiopia MoH. Ethiopia. Success factors for women’s and children’s health. WHO library cataloging-in-publication data; 2015.
  • Central Statistical Agency[Ethiopia]. Ethiopia demographic and health survey; 2016.
  • Oppong S, Tuuli M, Seffah J, Adanu R. Is there a safe limit of delay for emergency caesarean section in Ghana? Results of analysis of early perinatal outcome. Ghana Med J. 2014;48(1):24–30. doi:10.4314/gmj.v48i1.4
  • Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Classification of urgency of caesarean section. A continuum of Risk (Good practice No.11). Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/goodpractice11classificationofurgency.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2017.
  • Grace L, Greer RM, Kumar S, Perinatal consequences of a category 1 caesarean section at term. BMJ Open. 2015;5(7):e007248. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007248
  • The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Joint RANZCOG/ANZCA position statement on the provision of obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia services; 2015. Available from: https://www.scribd.com/document/290939491/Wpi-14-2014-Position-Statement-on-the-Provision-of-Obstetric-Anaesthesia-and-Analgesia-Services. Accessed June 29, 2017.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Caesarean birth. NICE guideline; 2021. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng192/resources/caesarean-birth-pdf-66142078788805. Accessed July 23, 2017.
  • Thomas J, Paranjothy S, James D. National cross-sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean-section. BMJ. 2004;328(7441):665. doi:10.1136/bmj.38031.775845.7C
  • Nasrallah FK, Harirah HM, Vadhera R. The 30 minutes decision to delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: fact or fiction? Am J Perinatol. 2004;21:63–68.
  • Bello FA, Tsele TA, Oluwasola TO. Decision-to-delivery intervals and perinatal outcomes following emergency cesarean delivery in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130(3):279–283. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.036
  • Wong TCT. Decision to delivery intervals and total duration of surgery for caesarean section in tertiary government hospital. Singap Med J. 2017;58(6):332. doi:10.11622/smedj.2016098
  • Temesgen MM, Gebregzi AH, Kasahun HG, et al. Evaluation of decision to delivery time interval and its effect on feto-maternal outcomes and associated factors in category-1 emergency caesarean section deliveries: prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–11. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-2828-z
  • Tashfeen K, Patel M, Hamdi IM, Al-Busaidi IHA, Al-Yarubi MN. Decision-to delivery time intervals in emergency caesarean section cases: repeated cross-sectional study from Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2017;17(1):38–42. doi:10.18295/squmj.2016.17.01.008
  • Hirani BA, Mchome BL, Mazuguni NS, et al. The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):411. doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1608-x
  • Andisha E, Cronje L. Evaluating the decision-to-delivery interval in category 1 emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary referral hospital. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;25(3):95–99. doi:10.7196/sajog.1510
  • Leung TY, Lao TT. Timing of caesarean section according to urgency. Best Practice Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:251–267.
  • Melman S, Schreurs RHP, Dirksen CD, et al. Identification of barriers and facilitators for optimal cesarean section care: perspective of professionals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):230. doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1416-3
  • Khemworapong K, Sompagdee N, Boriboonhirunsarn D. Decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean delivery in tertiary care hospital in Thailand. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(1):48–55. doi:10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.48
  • Nakintu E, Murokora D. Emergency caesarean sections: decision to delivery interval and obstetric outcomes in Nsambya hospital, Uganda – a cross-sectional study. Medwin J Gynecol. 2016;1(4):122.
  • Hussein AH Emergency caesarean section turnaround time and its effect on maternal and newborn health outcomes at university of nairobi teaching hospitals; 2012. Available from http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/13758. Accessed June 20, 2016.
  • MacKenzie I, Cooke I. What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109(5):498–504. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01323.x
  • Hein A, Thalen D, Eriksson Y, Jakobsson JG. The decision to delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections: impact of anaesthetic technique and work shift. F1000Research. 2017;6:1977–1990. doi:10.12688/f1000research.13058.1
  • Abdissa Z, Awoke T, Belayneh T, Tefera Y. Birth outcome after caesarean section among mothers who delivered by caesarean section under general and spinal anesthesia at Gondar University teaching hospital north-west Ethiopia. J Anesther Clin Res. 2013;4:335.
  • Peker N, Aydin E, Eyesen MS, et al. Unscared uterine rupture and subsequent pregnancy outcome. A tertiary center experience. Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(2):95. doi:10.5603/GP.a2020.0012
  • Peker N, Yavuz M, Aydin E, Ege S, Bademriran MH, Karacor T. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean section due to hemorrhage: a tertiary center experience. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(3):464–470. doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1677599
  • Peker N, Yavuz M, Aydin E, et al. Bilateral hypogastric artery ligation: a tertiary center experience. J Harran Univ Med Faculity. 2919;16(3):526–529. doi:10.35440/hutfd.650517
  • Peker N, Turan G, Aydin E, et al. Analysis of patients undergoing peripartum hysterectomy for obstetric causes according to delivery methods: 13 years’ experience of tertiary center. Dicle Med J/Dicle Tip Dergisi. 2020;47(1):122–129. doi:10.5798/dicletip.706086
  • Dunn CN, Zhang Q, Sia JT, Assam PN, Tagore S, Sng BL. Evaluation of timings and outcomes in category-one caesarean sections: a retrospective cohort study. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(8):546. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.187782
  • Mak S-L, Fhkcog FO. Maternal and fetal outcomes in extremely urgent caesarean delivery in relation to the decision-to-delivery interval. J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery. 2015;15(1):16–22.