Labor Companionship in Labor and Delivery at Debremarkos Town Public Health Facilities: Magnitude and Associated Factors

References

• Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in Facility-Based Childbirth. Boston: USAID-TRAction Project, Harvard School of Public Health; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hodnett ED, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:4.
   Google Scholar
• Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(7). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience. World Health Organization; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Aghor UD. Assessing the effect of companionship during labour on labour and delivery outcomes at mile four hospital, Ishieke Abakaliki, Ebonyi state. Fam Med. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Scott KD, Klaus PH, Klaus MH. The obstetrical and postpartum benefits of continuous support during childbirth. J Wom Health Gend Base Med. 1999;8(10):1257–1264. doi:10.1089/jwh.1.1999.8.1257
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang M, Song Q, Xu J, et al. Continuous support during labour in childbirth: a Cross-Sectional Study in a university teaching hospital in Shanghai, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–7. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-2119-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DA, Lake MF, Falk M, Backstrand JR. A randomized control trial of continuous support in labor by a lay doula. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35(4):456–464. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00067.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruggemann OM, Parpinelli MA, Osis MJ, Cecatti JG, Neto ASC. Support to woman by a companion of her choice during childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Health. 2007;4(1):5. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-4-5
   Google Scholar
• Banda G, Kafulafula G, Nyirenda E, Taulo F, Kalilani L. Acceptability and experience of supportive companionship during childbirth in Malawi. BJOG. 2010;117(8):937–945. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omojuwa I. The effect of continuous companionship support on the progress and outcome of labour. Obstet Gynaecol. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Maimbolwa MC. Maternity Care in Zambia: With Special Reference to Social Support. Institutionen för folkhälsovetenskap/Department of Public Health Sciences; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Tekle Bobo Firew KKH, Belachew E, Woldie Mirkuzie FTR. Disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Western Ethiopia: should women continue to tolerate? PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0217126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munkhondya BM, Munkhondya TE, Chirwa E, Wang H. Efficacy of companion-integrated childbirth preparation for childbirth fear, self-efficacy, and maternal support in primigravid women in Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):48. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2717-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balde MD, Nasiri K, Mehrtash H, et al. Labour companionship and women’s experiences of mistreatment during childbirth: results from a multi-country community-based survey. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(Suppl 2):e003564. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick RJ, Cooper D, Harries J. Narratives of distress about birth in South African public maternity settings: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2014;30(7):862–868. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2013.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckström C, Wahn EH. Support during labour: first-time fathers’ descriptions of requested and received support during the birth of their child. Midwifery. 2011;27(1):67–73. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2009.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurissa BFGT, Getinet T. Assessment of provision of women friendly care and associated factors among postnatal mothers at three public hospitals of Jimma Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia, 2016. J Biomed Sci. 2017;6(3):26. doi:10.4172/2254-609X.100070
   Google Scholar
• Kaba MBT, Tafesse Z, Lingerh W, Ali I, Ali I. Sociocultural determinants of home delivery in Ethiopia: a qualitative study. Int J Womens Health. 2016;8:93–102. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S98722
   Google Scholar
• Raven J, Tao F, Kun H, Tolhurst R. The quality of childbirth care in China: women’s voices: a Qualitative Study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):113. doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0545-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful Maternity Care. The Universal Rights of Childbearing Women. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe-Kaas HM, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low-and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):71. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-11-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asefa A, Bekele D. Status of respectful and non-abusive care during facility-based childbirth in a hospital and health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):33. doi:10.1186/s12978-015-0024-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasi E, Borchert M, Campbell OM, et al. Losing women along the path to safe motherhood: why is there such a gap between women’s use of antenatal care and skilled birth attendance? A mixed methods study in northern Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1–5. doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0695-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF. UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Maternal Mortality, Fact Sheet No. 348. World Health Organization; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World health statistics: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2019/en/. Accessed Jan 23, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Standards for Improving Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Health Facilities. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ntombana R, Sindiwe J, Ntombodidi T. Opinions of labouring women about companionship in labour wards. Afr J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;8(3):123–127. doi:10.12968/ajmw.2014.8.3.123
   Google Scholar
• EMWA. Best Practice in Respectful Maternity Care. Ethiopia midwife association; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• FIGO. FIGO guideline mother—baby friendly birthing facilities. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;128(2):95–99. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagu D, Sudhinaraset M, Diamond-Smith N, et al. Where women go to deliver: understanding the changing landscape of childbirth in Africa and Asia. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(8):1146–1152. doi:10.1093/heapol/czx060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz CSG, d’Orsi E, Domingues RMSM, et al. Implementation of the presence of companions during hospital admission for childbirth: data from the Birth in Brazil national survey. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30(suppl 1):S140–S53. doi:10.1590/0102-311X00127013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira FA, Leal GC, Wolff LD, Gonçalves LS. The use of Bologna score to assess normal labor care in maternities. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2015;36(spe):177–184.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mandeel HM, Almufleh AS, Al-Damri A-JT. Saudi women’s acceptance and attitudes towards companion support during labor: should we implement an antenatal awareness program? Ann Saudi Med. 2013;33(1):28–33. doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2013.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin-adenekan OK. Attitude of Nigerian parturients to companionship in labour and assessement of their childbirth experience. Obstet Gynaecol. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bishanga DR, Massenga J, Mwanamsangu AH, et al. Women’s experience of facility-based childbirth care and receipt of an early postnatal check for herself and her newborn in northwestern Tanzania. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(3):481. doi:10.3390/ijerph16030481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynes MM, Binzen S, Twentyman E, et al. Client and provider factors associated with companionship during labor and birth in Kigoma region, Tanzania. Midwifery. 2019;69:92–101. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afulani P, Kusi C, Kirumbi L, Walker D. Companionship during facility-based childbirth: results from a mixed-methods study with recently delivered women and providers in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–28. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1806-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisseha G, Berhane Y, Worku A. Quality of intrapartum and newborn care in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2184-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyene Getahun K, Ukke GG, Alemu BW. Utilization of companionship during delivery and associated factors among women who gave birth at Arba Minch town public health facilities, southern Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240239. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz CS, d’Orsi E, Domingues RM, et al. Implementation of the presence of companions during hospital admission for childbirth: data from the Birth in Brazil national survey. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014;30:S140–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabakian‐Khasholian T, El‐Nemer A, Bashour H. Perceptions about labor companionship at public teaching hospitals in three Arab countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;129(3):223–226. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirdil M, Pirdel L. A comparison of women’s expectations of labour and birth with the experiences in primiparas and multiparas with normal vaginal delivery. J Kathmandu Med Coll. 2015;4(1):16–25. doi:10.3126/jkmc.v4i1.15024
   Google Scholar
• Norr KL, Block CR, Charles AG, Meyering S. The second time around: parity and birth experience. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1980;9(1):30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Jewkes R, Abrahams N, Mvo Z. Why do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(11):1781–1795. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00240-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filby A, McConville F, Portela A. What prevents quality midwifery care? A systematic mapping of barriers in low and middle income countries from the provider perspective. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0153391. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar