Optimizing the Detection of Occult Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Multicentre Study in China

References

• Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e191–e203. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narducci F, Merlot B, Bresson L, et al. Occult invasive cervical cancer found after inadvertent simple hysterectomy: is the ideal management: systematic parametrectomy with or without radiotherapy or radiotherapy only? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(4):1349–1352. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4140-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu HW, Li J, Liu YY, et al. Can radical parametrectomy be omitted in occult cervical cancer after extrafascial hysterectomy? Chin J Cancer. 2015;34(9):413–419. doi:10.1186/s40880-015-0041-7
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius RG, Belinson JL, Peterson P. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cervical conization to exclude cervical cancer before simple hysterectomy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24(2):202–205. doi:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi DH, Huh SJ, Nam KH. Radiation therapy results for patients undergoing inappropriate surgery in the presence of invasive cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;65(3):506–511. doi:10.1006/gyno.1997.4711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam A, Fauci JM, Schneider KE, et al. Invasive cervical cancer and screening: what are the rates of unscreened and underscreened women in the modern era? J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011;15(2):110–113. doi:10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181f515a2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SI, Kim SJ, Suh DH, Kim K, No JH, Kim YB. Pathologic discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the uterine cervix in women with cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020;31(2):e13. doi:10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong Q, Song Y, Wang Q, et al. A large retrospective study of 12714 cases of LEEP conization focusing on cervical cancer that colposcopy-directed biopsy failed to detect. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:5138232. doi:10.1155/2018/5138232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannella L, Mfuta K, Gardini G, Rubino T, Fodero C, Prandi S. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;186:68–74. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noothong S, Inthasorn P, Warnnissorn M. Pathological discrepancy between colposcopic directed cervical biopsy and Loop Electrosurgical-Excision Procedures (LEEPs) in patients with biopsies proven high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56(5):628–631. doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2017.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bösze P, et al. 2011 colposcopic terminology of the international federation for cervical pathology and colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(1):166–172. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318254f90c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappatte OA, Byrne DL, Raju KS, Nayagam M, Kenney A. Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ): a cause for concern. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;43(1):46–50. doi:10.1016/0090-8258(91)90007-r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoler MH, Vichnin MD, Ferenczy A, et al.; FUTURE I, II and III Investigators. The accuracy of colposcopic biopsy: analyses from the placebo arm of the Gardasil clinical trials. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(6):1354–1362. doi:10.1002/ijc.25470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duesing N, Schwarz J, Choschzick M, et al. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(6):1549–1554. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2493-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt BL, Factor RE, Jarboe EA, Layfield LJ. Negative loop electrosurgical cone biopsy finding following a biopsy diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: frequency and clinical significance. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136(10):1259–1261. doi:10.5858/arpa.2011-0494-OA
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabaca C, Koleli I, Sariibrahim B, et al. Is cervical punch biopsy enough for the management of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia? J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014;18(3):240–245. doi:10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182aa08f6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung Y, Lee AR, Lee SJ, Lee YS, Park DC, Park EK. Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(4):477–488. doi:10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.477
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuebs FA, Schulmeyer CE, Mehlhorn G, et al. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy in detecting early cervical neoplasia: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(2):525–532. doi:10.1007/s00404-018-4953-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkova N, Tsvetkov C, Tanchev L, Strateva D, Gorchev G. The role of colposcopy in diagnosis of pre-cancer and cancer of the uterine cervix. Akush Ginekol. 2010;49(6):37–40. Bulgarian.
   Google Scholar
• Luo XM, Song L, Wu JL, et al. Analysis of the reported data of national rural cervical cancer screening project from 2012 to 2013, China. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016;50(4):346–350. Chinese. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2016.04.012
   Google Scholar
• Sopracordevole F, Clemente N, Alessandrini L, et al. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions. Pathol Res Pract. 2017;213(3):210–216. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2016.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer JE, Amarad P, Ellis K, Dudding N, Smith J, Tidy JA. The outcome for women with microinvasive cervical cancer with stromal invasion 1 mm or less: should we always re-excise? Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012;31(5):470–474. doi:10.1097/PGP.0b013e31824a1d8d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao SJ, Wang Q, Zheng RL, et al. Retrospective analysis of positive leep surgical margin and residual lesion in 246 patients with cervical high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and micro invasive cancer after leep conization. Tumor. 2011;31(4):359–363.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao FY, Wang Q, Zheng RL, Chen M, Su TT, Sui L. Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016;51(3):186–191. Chinese. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, Philippe E. An analysis of the factors involved in the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76(5):468–473. doi:10.3109/00016349709047830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrom J, Douce G, Jones PW, et al. Should punch biopsies be used when high-grade disease is suspected at initial colposcopic assessment? A prospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16(1):253–256. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado Y, Almeida G, Lima R, Silva K, Maldonado P. Microinvasive squamous carcinoma (FIGO stage IA1) of the cervix: are there colposcopic criteria for the diagnosis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(4):360.e1–4. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repše-Fokter A, Pogačnik A, Snoj V, Primic-žakelj M, Fležar MS. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia. Cytopathology. 2012;23(1):23–29. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00816.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuakoonratt N, Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S, et al. Prevalence of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and invasive cervical cancer in patients with low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) at cervical pap smear. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9(2):253–257.
   Google Scholar
• López-Alegría F, De Lorenzi DS, Quezada OP. Follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (ASC-H). Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(1):15–22. doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1321597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius RG, Belinson JL, Peterson P, Burchette RJ. Factors that virtually exclude cervical cancer at colposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2015;19(4):319–322. doi:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Wang W, Yang P, et al. Analysis of the agreement between colposcopic impression and histopathological diagnosis of cervical biopsy in a single tertiary center of Chengdu. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(4):1033–1041. doi:10.1007/s00404-021-06012-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto R, Sekiyama K, Higuchi T, et al. Value and limitation of conization as a diagnostic procedure for cervical neoplasm. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(12):2419–2424. doi:10.1111/jog.14118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Dou Y, Wang M, et al. A retrospective analysis on 1901 women with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopic biopsy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;217:53–58. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver MI, Andrews J, Cooper CK, et al. Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or worse by cytology, human papillomavirus 16/18, and colposcopy impression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):725–735. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian XY, You ZX, Cao QW, Zou BB, Xing Y. Analysis of the missed diagnosis of invasive carcinoma under the microscope in HSIL diagnosed by colposcopy-guided biopsy and related influencing factors. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018;53(9):613–619. Chinese. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.09.006
   Google Scholar
• Ren H, Jia M, Zhao S, Li H, Fan S. Factors correlated with the accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest Surg. 2020;30:1–9. doi:10.1080/08941939.2020.1850944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan A, Zhang L, Wang C, Wang Y, Han C, Xue F. Analysis of clinical factors correlated with the accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(5):965–972. doi:10.1007/s00404-017-4500-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawano K, Tsuda N, Nishio S, et al. Identification of appropriate cone length to avoid positive cone margin in high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016;27(5):e54. doi:10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae HS, Chung YW, Kim T, Lee KW, Song JY. The appropriate cone depth to avoid endocervical margin involvement is dependent on age and disease severity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(2):185–192. doi:10.1111/aogs.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar