Perception of Key Ethical Issues in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) by Providers and Clients in Nigeria

References

• Chigombe A, Evans M, Perception NS. Management of human fertility: a Shona landscape. Int J Mgt Sust. 2012;1(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Guerri G, Maniscalchi T, Barati S, et al. Non-syndromic monogenic female infertility. Acta Biomed. 2019;90(10):68–74. doi:10.23750/abm.v90i10-S.8763
   Google Scholar
• Jegede AS, Fayemiwo AS. Cultural and ethical challenges of assisted reproductive technologies in the management of infertility among the Yoruba of Southwestern Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010;14(2):114–127.
   Google Scholar
• Menuba IE, Ugwu EO, Obi SN, Lawani LO, Onwuka CI. Clinical management and therapeutic outcome of infertile couples in southeast Nigeria. J Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014;10:763–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwajiaku LA, Mbachu II, Ikeako I. Prevalence clinical pattern major causes of male infertility in Nnewi, South-East, Nigeria: a five-year review. AfriMedic J. 2012;3(2):16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ola TM. Assisted reproductive technology in Nigeria: flawed or favored? Int J Soc Sci Hum. 2012;2(4):331–334.
   Google Scholar
• Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ, Barfield WD. Monitoring health outcomes of assisted reproductive technology. N Eng J Med. 2014;371(1):91–93. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1404371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ART. Practice in Lagos State Regulations and Guidelines. Health Facility Monitoring and Accreditation Agency; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Bamgbopa KJ, Okonta PI, Ajayi R, Ogbeche R, Igbokwe C, Onwuzurigbo K. Public perceptions on ethics in the practice of assisted reproductive technologies in Nigeria. Global Reprod Health. 2018;3:e13. doi:10.1097/GRH.0000000000000013
   Google Scholar
• Okonta PI, Ajayi R, Bamgbopa K, Ogbeche R, Okeke CC, Onwuzurigbo K. Ethical issues in the practice of assisted reproductive technologies in Nigeria: empirical data from fertility practitioners. Afr J Reprod Health. 2018;22(3):51–58. doi:10.29063/ajrh2018/v22i3.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajayi RA, Dibosa-Osadolor OJ. Stakeholders’ views on ethical issues in the practice of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2011;15(3):73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Ajayi RA, Dibosa-Osadolor OJ. Opinion of obstetricians and gynaecologists on ethical issues in the practice of in-vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer in Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2013;17(1):130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Okeibunor JC, Onyeneho NG, Okonofua FO. Policy and programs for reducing maternal mortality in Enugu State, Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010;14(3):19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Iketubosin F Regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technology—the role of government: AFRH registry 2017 preliminary report. Oral presentation at: International Annual Scientific Conference of The Association for Fertility and Reproductive Health; September 18-20. Hotel Presidential, Port-Harcourt Nigeria; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• McGinn D. Woman who gave birth at 66 dies, reigniting IVF debate; 2009. Available from: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/woman-who-gave-birth-at-66-dies-reigniting-ivf-debate/article4213308/. Accessed July 4, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Oocyte or embryo donation to women of advanced age: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(2):337–340. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisseha S, Clark NA. Assisted reproduction for postmenopausal women. AMA J Ethics. 2014;16(1):5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Melhem NM, Walker M, Moritz G, Brent DA. Antecedents, and sequelae of sudden parental death in offspring and surviving caregivers. Archiv Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(5):403–410. doi:10.1001/archpedi.162.5.403
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salihu HM, Shumpert MN, Slay M, Kirby RS, Alexander GR. Childbearing beyond maternal age 50 and fetal outcomes in the United States. J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5–1):1006–1014.
   Google Scholar
• Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1333. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson MM. Assisted reproductive technologies and equity of access issues. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:280–285. doi:10.1136/jme.2003.007542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson E. Regulating Reproduction: Law, Technology and Autonomy. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2001: 162.
   Google Scholar
• Liu C. Restricting access to infertility services: what is a justified limitation on reproductive freedom?. Minn JL Sci Tech; 2009;10: 291.
   Google Scholar
• Fathalla MF. Current challenges in assisted reproduction. In: Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD, editors. Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002:3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch E, De Vos M, Humaidan P. The future of cryopreservation in assisted reproductive technologies. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:67. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humanae Vitae. Encyclical letter of his Holiness Pope Paul VI on the regulation of birth 25 July 1968. Available from: www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/uf-p-vi-enc-25071968_humanae_vitae.html. Accessed July 4, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Donum Vitae. Instruction on respect for human life in its origin and on the dignity of Human Procreation Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith; 1987. Available from:https://www.catholicdoors.com/misc/marriage/cdfdr.htm. Accessed April 7, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn MC. He Won’t Be My Son”. Middle Eastern Muslim Men’s discourses of adoption and gamete donation. Med Anthropology Quart. 2006;20(1):94–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair DB. Assisted reproduction in Jewish Law. 30 Fordham Urb. Law J. 2002;30:71.
   Google Scholar
• Luna F. Assisted reproductive technology in Latin America: some ethical and sociocultural issues. In: Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD, editors. Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002: 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker AM. Reproduction opportunists in the new global sex trade: PGD and non-medical sex selection. Reprod Bio-Med Online. 2011;23:609–661. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollos M, Larsen U, Obono O, Whitehouse B. The problem of infertility in high fertility populations: meanings, consequences, and coping mechanisms in two Nigerian communities. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(11):2061–2068. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE). Violence: The Impact of Forced Evictions on Women in Palestine, India and Nigeria. Geneva: COHRE; 2002. Available from: globalinitiative-escr.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/violence-Report.pdf. Accessed April 7, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Durojaiye E. ‘Woman, but not human’: widowhood practices and human rights violations in Nigeria. Int J Law Pol Fam. 2013;27(2):176–196. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebt001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constructing BR. Gender from the inside out: sex-selection practices in the United States. Fem Stud. 2010;36(2):260–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Committee on Ethics (ACOG). Sex selection. J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;360:475–478.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe, Directorate of Legal Affairs. Convention for the Projection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regards to the Application of Biology and Medicine. Strasbourg: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine; 1996:14.
   Google Scholar
• Serour GI Bioethics of ART-a middle eastern perspective. International Workshop on Ethical Implications of Use of ART for Treatment of Human Infertility: An Update; 25–27 November. Cairo: International Islamic Center for Population Studies and Research, Al-Azhar University; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Preventing Gender-Biased Sex Selection. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501460. Accessed November 20, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Guilmoto CZ. The sex ratio transition in Asia. Pop Dev Rev. 2009;35:519–549. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondorp W, De Wert G, Pennings G, et al. ESHRE task force on ethics and law 20: sex selection for non-medical reasons. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1448–1454. doi:10.1093/humrep/det109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern K. Assisted reproductive technology: what’s new and what’s important? Aust Fam Physician. 2012;41(10):762–768.
   Google Scholar
• Ory SJ, Miller K, Horton M, et al. IFFS surveillance. Glob Reprod Health. 2016;1:e1.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta VP, Patel JA, Gupta RH, Shah SI, Banke MR. One plus one is better than two: cumulative reproductive outcomes are better after two elective single blastocyst embryo transfers compared to one double blastocyst embryo transfer. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018;11(2):161–168. doi:10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_117_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gianaroli L, Racowsky C, Geraedts J, Cedars M, Makrigiannakis A, Lobo R. Best practices of ASRM and ESHRE: a journey through reproductive medicine. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(12):3365–3379. doi:10.1093/humrep/des338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ory SJ, Devroey P, Banker M, et al. IFFS surveillance 2013. Preface and conclusions. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(6):1582–1583. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachariah M, Fleming R, Acharya U. Management of obese women in assisted conception units: a UK survey. Hum Fertil. 2006;9:101–105. doi:10.1080/14647270500475214
   Google Scholar
• Keane M, Long J, O’Nolan G, Farragher L. Assisted Reproductive Technologies: International Approaches to Public Funding Mechanisms and Criteria. An Evidence Review. Health Research Board; 2017:1–207.
   Google Scholar
• Rozée-Gomez V, de La Rochebrochard E. Cross-border reproductive care among French patients. experiences in Greece, Spain, and Belgium. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(11):3103–3110. doi:10.1093/humrep/det326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochieng J, Buwembo W, Munabi I, et al. Informed consent in clinical practice: patients’ experiences and perspectives following surgery. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:765. doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1754-z
   Google Scholar
• Giwa-Osagie OF. Social and ethical aspects of assisted conception in anglophone sub-Saharan Africa. In: Vayena E, Rowe PJ, Griffin PD, editors. Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002:50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act; 1990. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisation/human-fertilisation-embryology-authority. Accessed November 20, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal R, Burt E, Homburg R. Timeline in HFEA developments and regulatory challenges: 20 years of overseeing fertility practices and research in the UK. The J Obstet Gynecol India. 2013;63(6):363–369. doi:10.1007/s13224-013-0494-z
   Google Scholar
• Morgan JJ State Regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technology [All Theses and Dissertations 2206]; 2010. Available from: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2206. Accessed December 25, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Frith L, Blyth E. Assisted reproductive technology in the USA: is more regulation needed? Repr. Biomed Online. 2014;29(4):516–523. doi:10.1016/j/rbmo.2014.06.018
   Google Scholar
• Minkoff H, Ecker JL. The California octuplets and duties of reproductive endocrinologists. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):15.e1–3. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyioha IO, Yusuf AOA, Metiboba S. Regulation of HealthCare practice. In: Iyioha IO, Nwabueze RN, editors. Comparative Health Law and Policy: Critical Perspectives on Nigerian and Global Health Law. England: Ashgate Publishing Ltd; 2015:47–64.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Revised minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:578–582. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustapha Z. The practice of Assisted Human Reproduction Technologies (Arts) in Nigeria: the unanswered legal and ethical questions. J Law Judicial Syst. 2018;1(1):40–50.
   Google Scholar