479
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Factors Associated with Successful Vaginal Birth After a Primary Cesarean Section in Women with an Optimal Inter-Delivery Interval

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 903-909 | Published online: 05 Oct 2021

References

  • Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:6. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671
  • World Health Organization Human Reproduction Programme A. WHO Statement on caesarean section rates. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23(45):149–150. doi:10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007
  • Kwawukume EY. Caesarean section in developing countries. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;15(1):165–178. doi:10.1053/beog.2000.0155
  • Harrison MS, Pasha O, Saleem S, et al. A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in the setting of cesarean section in low- and middle-income countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(4):410–420. doi:10.1111/aogs.13098
  • Bishop D, Dyer RA, Maswime S, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after caesarean delivery in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(4):e513–e522.
  • Place K, Kruit H, Tekay A, Heinonen S, Rahkonen L. Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):176. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2334-3
  • Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth: a comparison of 3 national guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018;73(9):537–543. doi:10.1097/OGX.0000000000000596
  • Wingert A, Hartling L, Sebastianski M, et al. Clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates: systematic review & meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):529. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2689-5
  • Siddiqui SA. Obstetric factors for unsuccessful trial of labor in second-order birth following previous cesarean. Ann Saudi Med. 2013;33(4):356–362. doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2013.356
  • Wesson A, Assefa E. Maternal outcome following uterine rupture and its associated factors among mothers who delivered at Felege-Hiwot referral hospital, Amhara-Ethiopia. Int J. 2018;5(1):8.
  • Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(5):1003–1006. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d992fb
  • Huang WH, Nakashima DK, Rumney PJ, Keegan KA, Chan K. Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(1):41–44.
  • Ye L, Cao W, Yao J, Peng G, Zhou R. Systematic review of the effects of birth spacing after cesarean delivery on maternal and perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;147(1):19–28. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12895
  • Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;24:266–268.
  • Boulvain M, Fraser WD, Brisson-Carroll G, Faron G, Wallast E. Trial of labour after caesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(12):1385–1390. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11008.x
  • Seffah JD, Adu-Bonsaffoh K. Vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section: current trends and outlook in Ghana. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2014;4(2):1–25.
  • Oboro V, Adewunmi A, Ande A, Olagbuji B, Ezeanochie M, Oyeniran A. Morbidity associated with failed vaginal birth after cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(9):1229–1232. doi:10.3109/00016349.2010.499448
  • Misgan E, Gedefaw A, Negash S, Asefa A. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in teaching hospitals of Addis Ababa University: a cross-sectional study. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:1540460. doi:10.1155/2020/1540460
  • Birara M, Gebrehiwot Y. Factors associated with success of vaginal birth after one caesarean section (VBAC) at three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:31. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-13-31
  • Li YX, Bai Z, Long DJ, et al. Predicting the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study in China. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e027807. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027807
  • Kalok A, Zabil SA, Jamil MA, et al. Antenatal scoring system in predicting the success of planned vaginal birth following one previous caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(3):339–343. doi:10.1080/01443615.2017.1355896
  • Gupta S, Jeeyaselan S, Guleria R, Gupta A. An observational study of various predictors of success of vaginal delivery following a previous cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(4):260–264. doi:10.1007/s13224-014-0519-2
  • Madaan M, Agrawal S, Nigam A, Aggarwal R, Trivedi SS. Trial of labour after previous caesarean section: the predictive factors affecting outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(3):224–228. doi:10.3109/01443615.2010.544426
  • Lin J, Hou Y, Ke Y, Zeng W, Gu W. Establishment and validation of a prediction model for vaginal delivery after cesarean and its pregnancy outcomes-based on a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;242:114–121. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.015
  • Wu Y, Kataria Y, Wang Z, Ming WK, Ellervik C. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):360. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2517-y
  • Haumonté JB, Raylet M, Sabiani L, et al. Quels facteurs influencent la voie d’accouchement en cas de tentative de voie basse sur utérus cicatriciel ?Predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean section [Predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean section]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012;41(8):735–752. French. doi:10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.032
  • Familiari A, Neri C, Caruso A, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a multicentre study on prognostic factors and feasibility. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(2):509–515. doi:10.1007/s00404-020-05454-0
  • Trojano G, Damiani GR, Olivieri C, et al. VBAC: antenatal predictors of success. Acta Biomed. 2019;90(3):300–309.
  • Stamilio DM, Shanks A. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) outcomes associated with increasing number of prior VBACs. Womens Health (Lond). 2008;4(3):233–236. doi:10.2217/17455057.4.3.233
  • Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806–812. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02
  • Grobman WA, Sandoval G, Rice MM, et al. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.021
  • Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(6):907–910. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00531-0
  • Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, Jackson M, Holmgren C, Esplin S. Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(3):571–578. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829f8ced
  • Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean? Am J Perinatol. 2009;26(10):693–701. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1239494
  • Sentilhes L, Vayssière C, Beucher G, et al. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):25–32. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015
  • Wilson E, Sivanesan K, Veerasingham M. Rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section: what chance do obese women have? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;60(1):88–92. doi:10.1111/ajo.13003