Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnancy in Women with Scarred Uteri

References

• Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM; WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO statement on Caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667–670. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One. 2016;5(2):e0148343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
   Google Scholar
• Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–1348. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao J, Wang Y, Li X, et al. A Lancet Commission on 70 years of women’s reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health in China. Lancet. 2021;397(10293):2497–2536. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32708-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005671. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li HT, Hellerstein S, Zhou YB, Liu JM, Blustein J. Trends in Cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008–2018. JAMA. 2020;323(1):89–91. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.17595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenabi E, Khazaei S, Bashirian S, Aghababaei S, Matinnia N. Reasons for elective cesarean section on maternal request: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(22):3867–3872. doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1587407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu HT, Xu JJ, Lin J, et al. Association between first caesarean delivery and adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):273. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1895-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borgfeldt C, Andolf E. Transvaginal ultrasonographic findings in the uterus and the endometrium: low prevalence of leiomyoma in a random sample of women age 25–40 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(3):202–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu B, Wang Q, Yan L, Yu K, Cai Y. Analysis of pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022:9685585. doi:10.1155/2022/9685585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansa V, Laganà AS, Ferrari F, et al. Uterine rupture in pregnancy after hysteroscopic septum resection: a 20-year retrospective analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022;31(3):448–455. doi:10.1080/13645706.2020.1837884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrell A, Jayalath GKC, Gorry A, Gupta M, Odejinmi F. Placenta percreta after laparoscopic excision of intersitial ectopic pregnancy: a case for elective caesarean section after cornual resection? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;194:257–258. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark EA, Silver RM. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(6):S2–10. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.09.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, Ananth CV. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):771–778. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000206182.63788.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauniaux E, Ayres-de-Campos D, Langhoff-Roos J. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: introduction. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):1–2. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12839
   Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581–2589. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Li H, Li J, et al. Prediction of iatrogenic preterm birth in patients with scarred uterus: a retrospective cohort study in Northeast China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):490. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03165-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ. 2007;176(4):455–460. doi:10.1503/cmaj.060870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226–1232. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1458–1461. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet. 2010;375(9713):490–499. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Landon MB, Cheng W, Chen Y. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in China: what are the risks and benefits? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):817. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9(9):CD005528. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y, Liu H. Changes of indications for cesarean section. Chin J Obstet Emerg Electron. 2020;2:65–68. doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2020.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Öry F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. Uterine rupture in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2009;116(8):1069–1078. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02136.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BKS, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. Br Med J. 2004;329(7456):19–25. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7456.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta, clinical expert series. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(4):422–429. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Gao -L-L, Huang Z-J, Shen K, Xu H, Yan S-Q, Muryy A. The optimal timing of the subsequent pregnancy after cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35805. doi:10.1038/srep35805
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(5):731–738. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(5):1003–1006. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d992fb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schummers L, Hutcheon JA, Hernandez-Diaz S, et al. Association of short interpregnancy interval with pregnancy outcomes according to maternal age. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1661–1670. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick I, Kadish E, Rottenstreich M. Expert consensus on the management of subsequent pregnancy in advanced age women with scarred uterus. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet. 2021;37(5):558–563. doi:10.19538/j.fk2021050114
   Google Scholar
• Milazzo GN, Catalano A, Badia V, Mallozzi M, Caserta D. Myoma and myomectomy: poor evidence concern in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43(12):1789–1804. doi:10.1111/jog.13437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JR, Woodruff JD. Pregnancy following myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):869–874. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000729
   Google Scholar
• Dalal A, Sachar N, Nagar D, Choudhary D, Das CJ, Mittal S. Pregnancy outcome after myomectomy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(8):3237–3241. doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20173290
   Google Scholar
• ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 205. ACOG practice bulletin No. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110–127. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):450–463. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okada H, Kuhn C, Feillet H, Bach JF. The hygiene hypothesis’ for autoimmune and allergic diseases: an update. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;160(1):1–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04139.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martel MJ, MacKinnon CJN. 155-Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40(3):e195–207. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2018.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dy J, DeMeester S, Lipworth H, Barrett J. No. 382-Trial of labour after caesarean. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(7):992–1011. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YT, Hsieh YC, Shen H, Cheng CH, Lee KH, Torng PL. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: experience from a regional hospital. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;61(3):422–426. doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2022.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(4):801–807. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000284622.71222.b2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Forsén L, Vangen S. Uterine rupture after previous caesarean sections. BJOG. 2010;117(7):809–820. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02533.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Zhang L, Wang D, et al. Nomogram to predict postpartum hemorrhage in cesarean delivery for women with scarred uterus: a retrospective cohort study in China. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(9):1772–1782. doi:10.1111/jog.14354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennare R, Tucker G, Heard A, Chan A. Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):270–276. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000250469.23047.73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, de Graaf IM, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(2):132–139. doi:10.1002/uog.12479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins WP, Barra DA, Gallarreta FM, Nastri CO, Filho FM. Lower uterine segment thickness measurement in pregnant women with previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis using two- and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(3):301–306. doi:10.1002/uog.6224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):262–269. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000254169.49346.e9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinar S, Walsh L, Roberts N, et al. Timing of cesarean delivery in women with ≥2 previous cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(1):110.e1–110.e10. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.018
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiossi G, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Timing of delivery and adverse outcomes in term singleton repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(3):561–569. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182822193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulino FA, Ettore C, Ettore G. A review on management of caesarean scar pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021;33(5):400–404. doi:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noël L, Thilaganathan B. Caesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis, natural history and treatment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2022;34(5):279–286. doi:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a therapeutic dilemma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(1):32–33. doi:10.1002/uog.23549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar