Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements and Prediction of Second Trimester Pregnancy Loss: a Nomogram Model Analysis

References

• Edlow AG, Srinivas SK, Elovitz MA. Second-trimester loss and subsequent pregnancy outcomes: what is the real risk? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):581 e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westin M, Kallen K, Saltvedt S, et al. Miscarriage after a normal scan at 12-14 gestational weeks in women at low risk of carrying a fetus with chromosomal anomaly according to nuchal translucency screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(5):728–736. doi:10.1002/uog.5138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand L, Norwitz ER. Current controversies in cervical cerclage. Semin Perinatol. 2003;27(1):73–85. doi:10.1053/sper.2003.50005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD008991. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown R, Gagnon R, Delisle MF. No. 373-cervical insufficiency and cervical cerclage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(2):233–247. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2018.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Haas S, Chervoneva I, et al. Patients with prior second-trimester loss: prophylactic cerclage or serial transvaginal sonograms? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(3):747–751. doi:10.1067/mob.2002.124289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotiriadis A, Papatheodorou S, Kavvadias A, et al. Transvaginal cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(1):54–64. doi:10.1002/uog.7457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pergialiotis V, Psarris A, Antsaklis P, et al. Cervical cerclage vs pessary in women with a sonographic short cervix. Ultraschall Med. 2022;44:e257–e262. doi:10.1055/a-1938-6042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National institute of child health and human development maternal fetal medicine unit network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):567–572. doi:10.1056/NEJM199602293340904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, et al. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length < or =15 mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(6):1458–1467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauth EA, Jaeger HJ, Libera H, et al. MR imaging of the uterus and cervix in healthy women: determination of normal values. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(3):734–742. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0313-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Zhang J, Wang S, et al. MRI features and differential diagnoses of congenital vaginal atresia. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(9):777–781. doi:10.1080/09513590.2019.1588875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez RM, Biliatis I, Rockall A, et al. MRI measurement of residual cervical length after radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a blinded imaging analysis. BJOG. 2018;125(13):1726–1733. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Saghian R, Dorogin A, et al. Combination of histochemical analyses and micro-MRI reveals regional changes of the murine cervix in preparation for labor. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4903. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84036-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin No.142: cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(2 Pt 1):372–379. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farquharson RG. Late Pregnancy Loss. Cambridge University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Saccone G. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;9:CD007235. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007235.pub4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers KM, Feltovich H, Mazza E, et al. The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy. J Biomech. 2015;48(9):1511–1523. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzella S, El Helou N, Chubiz J, et al. Evolving cervical imaging technologies to predict preterm birth. Semin Immunopathol. 2020;42(4):385–396. doi:10.1007/s00281-020-00800-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zork NM, Myers KM, Yoshida K, et al. A systematic evaluation of collagen cross-links in the human cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):321 e1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamou B, Sheiner E, Coreanu T, et al. Intrapartum cervical lacerations and their impact on future pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(5):883–887. doi:10.1080/14767058.2018.1505852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Liang X, Cai M, et al. Development and validation of a model for individualized prediction of cervical insufficiency risks in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19(1):6. doi:10.1186/s12958-020-00693-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint S, Gibb DM. Recurrent second trimester miscarriage. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8(6):449–453. doi:10.1097/00001703-199612000-00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagnaro-Green A, Pearce E. Thyroid disorders in pregnancy. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8(11):650–658. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2012.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcnamee KM, Dawood F, Farquharson RG. Mid-trimester pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014;41(1):87–102. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2013.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto M, Feigenbaum SL, Crites Y, et al. Risk of preterm delivery in non-diabetic women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Perinatol. 2012;32(10):770–776. doi:10.1038/jp.2011.194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sir-Petermann T, Maliqueo M, Angel B, et al. Maternal serum androgens in pregnant women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: possible implications in prenatal androgenization. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(10):2573–2579. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.10.2573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib VV, Araujo Junior E, Sun SY, et al. Early indicators of cervical insufficiency assessed using magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(6):626–631. doi:10.3109/14767058.2014.928858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlotte D, Djelouah M, Dumange M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cervical length by the women’s age: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;254:245–250. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linehan LA, Morris AG, Meaney S, et al. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes following second trimester miscarriage-A prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;237:198–203. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar