A Theoretical Exploration of Artificial Intelligence’s Impact on Feto-Maternal Health from Conception to Delivery

References

• Richardson L, Kim S, Menon R, Han A. Organ-on-chip technology: the future of feto-maternal interface research. Front Physiol. 2020;11:715. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzakhani K, Ebadi A, Faridhosseini F, Khadivzadeh T. Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):526. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03190-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderdice F, McNeill J, Lynn F. A systematic review of systematic reviews of interventions to improve maternal mental health and well-being. Midwifery. 2013;29(4):389–399. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu G, Imhoff-Kunsch B, Girard AW. Biological mechanisms for nutritional regulation of maternal health and fetal development. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26(Suppl 1):4–26. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01291.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton GJ, Fowden AL, Thornburg KL. Placental origins of chronic disease. Physiol Rev. 2016;96(4):1509–1565. doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassi ZS, Dean SV, Mallick D, Bhutta ZA. Preconception care: delivery strategies and packages for care. Reprod Health. 2014;11(Suppl 3):S7. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David AL, Spencer RN. Clinical assessment of fetal well-being and fetal safety indicators. J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;62(Suppl 1):S67–S78. doi:10.1002/jcph.2126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baschat AA, Galan HL, Lee W, et al. The role of the fetal biophysical profile in the management of fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(4):475–486. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swamy GK, Skjšrven R. Association of preterm birth with long-term survival, reproduction, and next-generation preterm birth. JAMA. 2008;299(12):1429–1436. doi:10.1001/jama.299.12.1429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawn JE, Gravett MG, Nunes TM, Rubens CE, Stanton C; GAPPS Review Group. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (1 of 7): definitions, description of the burden and opportunities to improve data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(S1):1–22. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerby P, Bujold E. Early detection and prevention of intrauterine growth restriction and its consequences. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(8):749–750. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar J, Carroli G, Wojdyla D, et al. Preeclampsia, gestational hypertension and intrauterine growth restriction, related or independent conditions? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(4):921–931. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed Z, Mohamed K, Zeeshan S, Dong X. Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine. Database. 2020;2020:baaa010. doi:10.1093/database/baaa010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohoon TJ, Bhavnani SP. Toward precision health: applying artificial intelligence analytics to digital health biometric datasets. Per Med. 2020;17(4):307–316. doi:10.2217/pme-2019-0113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi YK, Hughes L, Ismagilova E, et al. Artificial Intelligence (AI): multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int J Info Manag. 2021;57:101994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauriola I, Lavelli A, Aiolli F. An introduction to deep learning in natural language processing: models, techniques, and tools. Neurocomputing. 2022;470:443–456. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.05.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KW, Torres Soto J, Glicksberg BS, et al. Artificial intelligence in cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(23):2668–2679. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesapane F, Codari M, Sardanelli F. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: threat or opportunity? Radiologists again at the forefront of innovation in medicine. Eur Radiol Exp. 2018;2(1):35. doi:10.1186/s41747-018-0061-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delanerolle G, Yang X, Shetty S, et al. Artificial intelligence: a rapid case for advancement in the personalization of Gynaecology/Obstetric and Mental Health care. Womens Health. 2021;17:17455065211018111.
   Google Scholar
• Pammi M, Aghaeepour N, Neu J. Multiomics, artificial intelligence, and precision medicine in perinatology. Pediatr Res. 2023;93(2):308–315. doi:10.1038/s41390-022-02181-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajirasouliha I, Elemento O. Precision medicine and artificial intelligence: overview and relevance to reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(5):908–913. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill B, Skouteris H, Boyle JA, et al. Health in preconception, pregnancy and postpartum global alliance: international network pregnancy priorities for the prevention of maternal obesity and related pregnancy and long-term complications. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):822. doi:10.3390/jcm9030822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassi ZS, Mansoor T, Salam RA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA. Essential pre-pregnancy and pregnancy interventions for improved maternal, newborn and child health. Reprod Health. 2014;11(Suppl 1):S2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shahbazi MN. Mechanisms of human embryo development: from cell fate to tissue shape and back. Development. 2020;147(14):dev190629. doi:10.1242/dev.190629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss AL, Chamley LW, James JL. Placental formation in early pregnancy: how is the centre of the placenta made? Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(6):750–760. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmy030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valladares DA, Rasmussen SA. An update on teratogens for pediatric healthcare providers. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2022;34(6):565–571. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000001177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narain S, McEwan A. Antenatal assessment of fetal well-being. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2023;33(8):217–224. doi:10.1016/j.ogrm.2023.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Haug CJ, Drazen JM, Drazen JM, Kohane IS, Leong T-Y. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical medicine, 2023. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(13):1201–1208. doi:10.1056/NEJMra2302038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taye MM. Understanding of machine learning with deep learning: architectures, workflow, applications and future directions. Computers. 2023;12(5):91. doi:10.3390/computers12050091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi RY, Coyner AS, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Chiang MF, Campbell JP. Introduction to machine learning, neural networks, and deep learning. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(2):14. doi:10.1167/tvst.9.2.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greener JG, Kandathil SM, Moffat L, Jones DT. A guide to machine learning for biologists. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23(1):40–55. doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00407-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janiesch C, Zschech P, Heinrich K. Machine learning and deep learning. Electron Mark. 2021;31(3):685–695. doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan R, Rao S, He JR. Perinatal health predictors using artificial intelligence: a review. Womens Health. 2021;17:17455065211046132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akazawa M, Hashimoto K. Prediction of preterm birth using artificial intelligence: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42(6):1662–1668. doi:10.1080/01443615.2022.2056828
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhombres F, Bonnard J, Bailly K, Maurice P, Papageorghiou AT, Jouannic JM. Contributions of artificial intelligence reported in obstetrics and gynecology journals: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(4):e35465. doi:10.2196/35465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armero W, Gray KJ, Fields KG, Cole NM, Bates DW, Kovacheva VP. A survey of pregnant patients’ perspectives on the implementation of artificial intelligence in clinical care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022;30(1):46–53. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HY, Cho GJ, Kwon HS. Applications of artificial intelligence in obstetrics. Ultrasonography. 2023;42(1):2–9. doi:10.14366/usg.22063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn KH, Lee KS. Artificial intelligence in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022;65(2):113–124. doi:10.5468/ogs.21234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emin EI, Emin E, Papalois A, Willmott F, Clarke S, Sideris M. Artificial intelligence in obstetrics and gynaecology: is this the way forward? In Vivo. 2019;33(5):1547–1551. doi:10.21873/invivo.11635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L, Boland MR. Towards deep phenotyping pregnancy: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and machine learning methods to improve pregnancy outcomes. Brief Bioinform. 2021;22(5):bbaa369. doi:10.1093/bib/bbaa369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennickent D, Rodríguez A, Opazo MC, et al. Machine learning applied in maternal and fetal health: a narrative review focused on pregnancy diseases and complications. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1130139. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1130139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazantsev A, Ponomareva J, Kazantsev P, Digilov R, Huang P. Development of e-health network for in-home pregnancy surveillance based on artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE; January 5; 2012:82–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HM, Ko T, Kang H, et al. Improved prediction of clinical pregnancy using artificial intelligence with enhanced inner cell mass and trophectoderm images. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):3240. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52241-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VerMilyea M, Hall JMM, Diakiw SM, et al. Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(4):770–784. doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feduniw S, Golik D, Kajdy A, et al. Application of artificial intelligence in screening for adverse perinatal outcomes-a systematic review. Healthcare. 2022;10(11):2164. doi:10.3390/healthcare10112164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamshidnezhad A, Hosseini SM, Mohammadi-Asl J, Mahmudi M. An intelligent prenatal screening system for the prediction of Trisomy-21. Inf Med Unlocked. 2021;24:100625. doi:10.1016/j.imu.2021.100625
   Google Scholar
• Gulzar Ahmad S, Iqbal T, Javaid A, et al. Sensing and artificial intelligent maternal-infant health care systems: a review. Sensors. 2022;22(12):4362. doi:10.3390/s22124362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oti O, Azimi I, Anzanpour A, Rahmani AM, Axelin A, Liljeberg P. IoT-based healthcare system for real-time maternal stress monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies. September 26; 2018:57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Allen ME, Irizarry T, Einhorn J, et al. SMS-facilitated home blood pressure monitoring: a qualitative analysis of resultant health behavior change. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(12):2246–2253. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu M, Sakai A, Komatsu R, et al. Detection of cardiac structural abnormalities in fetal ultrasound videos using deep learning. Appl Sci. 2021;11(1):371. doi:10.3390/app11010371
   Google Scholar
• Rayhana T, Arefina AS, Chowdhury SA. Automatic detection of fetal health status from cardiotocography data using machine learning algorithms. J Bangladesh Acad Sci. 2021;45(2):155–167. doi:10.3329/jbas.v45i2.57206
   Google Scholar
• Xiao S, Zhang J, Zhu Y, et al. Application and progress of artificial intelligence in fetal ultrasound. J Clin Med. 2023;12(9):3298. doi:10.3390/jcm12093298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison MS, Goldenberg RL. Global burden of prematurity. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(2):74–79. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walani SR. Global burden of preterm birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;150(1):31–33. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha TAH, de Thomaz EBAF, de Almeida DG, et al. Data-driven risk stratification for preterm birth in Brazil: a population-based study to develop of a machine learning risk assessment approach. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021;3:100053. doi:10.1016/j.lana.2021.100053
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao C, Osmundson S, Velez Edwards DR, Jackson GP, Malin BA, Chen Y. Deep learning predicts extreme preterm birth from electronic health records. J Biomed Inform. 2019;100:103334. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatibi T, Kheyrikoochaksarayee N, Sepehri MM. Analysis of big data for prediction of provider-initiated preterm birth and spontaneous premature deliveries and ranking the predictive features. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(6):1565–1582. doi:10.1007/s00404-019-05325-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelícia SMC, Fekete SMW, Corrente JE, Rugolo LMSS. Impact of early-onset preeclampsia on feeding tolerance and growth of very low birth weight infants during hospitalization. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022;41:e2021203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sufriyana H, Wu YW, Su EC. Prediction of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: development of machine learning models on a prospective cohort. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8(5):e15411. doi:10.2196/15411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett R, Mulla ZD, Parikh P, Hauspurg A, Razzaghi T, Mohammadzadeh A. An imbalance-aware deep neural network for early prediction of preeclampsia. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0266042. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosschieter TM, Xu Z, Lan H, et al. Interpretable predictive models to understand risk factors for maternal and fetal outcomes. J Healthc Inform Res. 2023;8(1):65–87. doi:10.1007/s41666-023-00151-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kovacheva VP, Eberhard BW, Cohen RY, Maher M, Saxena R, Gray KJ. Preeclampsia prediction using machine learning and polygenic risk scores from clinical and genetic risk factors in early and late pregnancies. Hypertension. 2024;81(2):264–272. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marić I, Tsur A, Aghaeepour N, et al. Early prediction of preeclampsia via machine learning. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(2):100100. doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakinah N, Tahir M, Badriyah T, Syarif I. LSTM with Adam optimization-powered high accuracy preeclampsia classification. In: 2019 International Electronics Symposium (IES). Surabaya, Indonesia; September 27–28; 2019:314–319.
   Google Scholar
• Artzi NS, Shilo S, Hadar E, et al. Prediction of gestational diabetes based on nationwide electronic health records. Nat Med. 2020;26(1):71–76. doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0724-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YT, Zhang CJ, Mol BW, et al. Early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the Chinese Population via Advanced Machine Learning. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(3):e1191–e1205. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Lv B, Chen X, et al. An early model to predict the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in the absence of blood examination indexes: application in primary health care centres. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):814. doi:10.1186/s12884-021-04295-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drukker L. Real-time identification of fetal anomalies on ultrasound using artificial intelligence: what’s next? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;59(3):285–287. doi:10.1002/uog.24869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawat V, Jain A, Shrimali V, Raghuvanshi S. Performance analysis of different learning algorithms of feed forward neural network regarding fetal abnormality detection. In: Thanh Nguyen N, Kowalczyk R, editors. Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXX. Springer; 2018:118–132. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11120. Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Zhang Y, Zhu H, et al. Fetal congenital heart disease echocardiogram screening based on DGACNN: adversarial one-class classification combined with video transfer learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020;39(4):1206–1222. doi:10.1109/TMI.2019.2946059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshaka R, Gaunt T, Shelmerdine SC. Artificial intelligence applied to fetal MRI: a scoping review of current research. Br J Radiol. 2023;96(1147):20211205. doi:10.1259/bjr.20211205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskó B, Topol EJ. The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6(1):120. doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00873-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhang ZM. Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023;23(1):7. doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithany RH, Aslam S, Abdallah S, et al. Advancements and challenges in the application of artificial intelligence in surgical arena: a literature review. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e47924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar