Association Between Pregnancy Outcomes and the Time of Progesterone Exposure of D6 Single-Blastocyst Transfer in Frozen-Thawed Cycles: A Retrospective Cohort Study

References

• Casper RF, Yanushpolsky EH. Optimal endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer cycles: window of implantation and progesterone support. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):867–872. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:139–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):344–348. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, et al. Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):126–136. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1705334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdon M, Pocate-Cheriet K, Finet de Bantel A, et al. Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(10):1948–1964. doi:10.1093/humrep/dez163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerushalmi GM, Shavit T, Avraham S, et al. Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10715. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90238-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franasiak JM, Ruiz-Alonso M, Scott RT, Simón C. Both slowly developing embryos and a variable pace of luteal endometrial progression may conspire to prevent normal birth in spite of a capable embryo. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):861–866. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navot D, Scott RT, Droesch K, Veeck LL, Liu HC, Rosenwaks Z. The window of embryo transfer and the efficiency of human conception in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1991;55(1):114–118. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54069-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Zhou P, Lin X, Wang S, Zhang S. Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(8):1913–1926. doi:10.1007/s10815-021-02125-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh B, Reschke L, Segars J, Baker VL. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: the potential importance of the corpus luteum in preventing obstetrical complications. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(2):252–257. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgory A, Kalma Y, Kopel R, Azem F. Transfer of day 6 frozen-thawed blastocysts on day 5 compared with day 6: catching up with the window of implantation-a retrospective study. Reprod Sci. 2021;28(8):2208–2215. doi:10.1007/s43032-021-00458-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Bu Z, Hu L. Live birth rate of frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer after 6 or 7 days of progesterone administration in hormone replacement therapy cycles: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:706427. doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.706427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelens C, Santos-Ribeiro S, Becu L, et al. Frozen-warmed blastocyst transfer after 6 or 7 days of progesterone administration: impact on live birth rate in hormone replacement therapy cycles. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(1):125–132. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Zhao J, Ma X, et al. Effect of orlistat on live birth rate in overweight or obese women undergoing IVF-ET: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(9):e3533–e3545. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgab340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523–533. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1513873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–1158. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00518-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Ma S, Zhao J, et al. Non-assisted hatching trophectoderm biopsy does not increase the risks of most adverse maternal and neonatal outcome and may be more practical for busy clinics: evidence from China. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:819963. doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.819963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei D, Liu JY, Sun Y, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1310–1318. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32843-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(9):1786–1801. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Qiu S, Chen X, Zhu S, Sun Y, Zheng B. D6 blastocyst transfer on day 6 in frozen-thawed cycles should be avoided: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):519. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03224-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatway C, Gunby J, Daya S. Day three versus day two embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2:CD004378.
   Google Scholar
• Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;6:CD002118.
   Google Scholar
• Sehring J, Beltsos A, Jeelani R. Human implantation: the complex interplay between endometrial receptivity, inflammation, and the microbiome. Placenta. 2022;117:179–186.ary 2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortoletto P, Bakkensen J, Anchan RM. Embryo transfer: timing and techniques. Minerva Endocrinol. 2018;43(1):57–68. doi:10.23736/S0391-1977.17.02649-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karizbodagh MP, Rashidi B, Sahebkar A, Masoudifar A, Mirzaei H. Implantation window and angiogenesis. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118(12):4141–4151. doi:10.1002/jcb.26088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessey BA, Young SL. What exactly is endometrial receptivity? Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):611–617. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(23):1796–1799. doi:10.1056/NEJM199906103402304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreux L, Bourdon M, Sallem A, et al. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(3):390–398. doi:10.1093/humrep/dey004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewoud ER, Cohlen BJ, Al-Oraiby A, et al. A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1483–1492. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glujovsky D, Pesce R, Sueldo C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Hart RJ, Ciapponi A. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10(10):CD006359. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006359.pub3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray MJ, Meyer WR, Zaino RJ, et al. A critical analysis of the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic endometrial dating in fertile women. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1333–1343. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandre V, Potdar J, Keerti A. Preterm birth: an overview. Cureus. 2022;14(12):e33006. doi:10.7759/cureus.33006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman EJ, Upham KM, Cheng M, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening alters traditional morphology-based embryo selection: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cycles of planned fresh euploid blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):718–724. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman L, et al. Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1370e8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu TF, Chen MJ, Lee MS, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome between day 5 and day 6 single blastocyst transfers in cycles undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62(3):429–433. doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2023.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco E, Yakovlev P, Kornilov N, et al. Two clinical case reports of embryonic mosaicism identified with PGT-A persisting during pregnancy as true fetal mosaicism. Hum Reprod. 2023;38(2):315–323. doi:10.1093/humrep/deac263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar