Increased cesarean section rate in Central Saudi Arabia: a change in practice or different maternal characteristics

References

• AbenhaimHABenjaminAHigher caesarean section rates in women with higher body mass index: are we managing labour differently?J Obstet Gynaecol Can201133544344821639963
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BillardMCesarean section on demand: is it a fad or an advance in medical practice?Can Fam Physician20115711e406124322084470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AshtianiNHagmolen of ten HaveWVreedeWTVogtWPvan ElburgRMRespiratoire complicaties bij vroege electieve sectio caesarea [Respiratory complications in early elective caesarean section]Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd2009153A5719857305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonnellNJPaechMJClavisiOMScottKLGroupATDifficult and failed intubation in obstetric anaesthesia: an observational study of airway management and complications associated with general anaesthesia for caesarean sectionInt J Obstet Anesth200817429229718617389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaricTTomicVDarkoKPuerperalne komplikacije u prvorotki porodenih carskim rezom: studija parova [Puerperal complications in nulliparous women delivered by section caesarean: pair study]Med Arh200660424625016761520
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bulow-LehnsbyALGronbeckLKrebsLLanghoff-RoosJKomplikationer i forbindelse med kejsersnit i elektivt sectio-team [Complications of elective caesarean section performed by a special section team]Ugeskr Laeger2006168474088409017134605
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JonsdottirGBjarnadottirRIGeirssonRTSmarasonAEru tengsl a milli ti[eth]ni keisaraskur[eth]a og bur[eth]armalsdau[eth]a a Islandi undanfarin 15 ar? [No correlation between rates of caesarean section and perinatal mortality in Iceland]Laeknabladid200692319119516520491
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HountonSHNewlandsDMedaNDe BrouwereVA cost-effectiveness study of caesarean-section deliveries by clinical officers, general practitioners and obstetricians in Burkina FasoHum Resour Health200973419371433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MurraySFRelation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative studyBMJ200032172751501150511118176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GianiUBruzzeseDPuglieseASaporitoMTriassiMRisk factors analysis for elective caesarean section in Campania region (Italy)Epidemiol Prev201135210111021628753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KmietowiczZNICE advises against caesarean section on demandBMJ20043287447103115117770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SultanAHStantonSLPreserving the pelvic floor and perineum during childbirth – elective caesarean section?Br J Obstet Gynaecol199610387317348760699
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SciosciaMVimercatiACitoLChironnaEScattarellaDSelvaggiLESocial determinants of the increasing caesarean section rate in ItalyMinerva Ginecol200860211512018487961
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BartonACaesarean section and litigationLancet2001357925555611229694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BelizanJMQuarantaPPaquezEVillarJCaesarean section and fear of litigationLancet1991338878014621683446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallumCExplaining caesarean section in Salvador da Bahia, BrazilSociol Health Illn200527221524215787776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NuttallCCaesarean section controversy. The caesarean culture of BrazilBMJ20003207241107410836808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ba’aqeelHSCesarean delivery rates in Saudi Arabia: a ten-year reviewAnn Saudi Med200929317918319448379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FengXLXuLGuoYRonsmansCFactors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008Bull World Health Organ2012901303939A22271962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarberELLundsbergLSBelangerKPettkerCMFunaiEFIlluzziJLIndications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rateObstet Gynecol20111181293821646928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StavrouEPFordJBShandAWMorrisJMRobertsCLEpidemiology and trends for caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based studyBMC Pregnancy Childbirth201111821251270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsACOG committee opinion no. 559: cesarean delivery on maternal requestObstet Gynecol2013121490490723635708
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• al-MubarakKAAdamchakDJFertility attitudes and behavior of Saudi Arabian students enrolled in U.S. universitiesSoc Biol1994413–4267273Fall-Winter7761910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilsonDDornanJMilsomIFreemanRUR-CHOICE: can we provide mothers-to-be with information about the risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction?Int Urogynecol J201425111449145224740445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RogersRGLeemanLMBordersNContribution of the second stage of labour to pelvic floor dysfunction: a prospective cohort comparison of nulliparous womenBJOG2014121911451153 discussion 115424548705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HandaVLPierceCBMunozABlomquistJLLongitudinal changes in overactive bladder and stress incontinence among parous womenNeurourol Urodyn201534435636124633996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GyhagenMBullarboMNielsenTFMilsomIA comparison of the long-term consequences of vaginal delivery versus caesarean section on the prevalence, severity and bothersomeness of urinary incontinence subtypes: a national cohort study in primiparous womenBJOG2013120121548155523786421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GyhagenMBullarboMNielsenTFMilsomIThe prevalence of urinary incontinence 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean deliveryBJOG2013120214415122413831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FaisalIMatinniaNHejarARKhodakaramiZWhy do primigravidae request caesarean section in a normal pregnancy? A qualitative study in IranMidwifery201430222723324055288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdekanleDAAdeyemiASFaderoFFBooking status and caesarean section outcome in LAUTECH teaching Hospital, OsogboNiger J Med2008171252818390127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KottmelAHoesliITraubRMaternal request: a reason for rising rates of cesarean section?Arch Gynecol Obstet20122861939822407124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShaabanMMAhmedWSKhadrZEl-SayedHFObstetricians’ perspective towards cesarean section delivery based on professional level: experience from EgyptArch Gynecol Obstet2012286231732322437189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PradhanATincelloDGKearneyRChildbirth after pelvic floor surgery: analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics in England, 2002–2008BJOG2013120220020423190206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DemoulinGThubertTFaivreETrichotCDeffieuxXGrossesse et post-partum des patientes porteuses de bandelette sous-uretrale: revue de la litterature [Pregnancy and postpartum of women with mid-urethral sling procedure: a review of the literature]J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)201342651852423182788
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TommaselliGADi CarloCFormisanoCFabozziANappiCVaginal delivery following single incision sling (TVT-Secur) for female stress urinary incontinenceJ Obstet Gynaecol Res201339260861022925452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KohorstFFlockFKreienbergRReichAPregnancy and delivery after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure: literature review and case reportEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol20101511101320434826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TanHJSiuWFaerberGJMcGuireEJLatiniJMLong-term durability of pubovaginal fascial slings in women who then become pregnant and deliverInt Urogynecol J201021663163520135304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EbulueVVadalkarJCelySDopwellFYoongWFear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand200887111234123819016358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GharoroEPEnabudosoEJLabour management: an appraisal of the role of false labour and latent phase on the delivery modeJ Obstet Gynaecol200626653453717000500
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VimercatiAGrecoPLoizziVLoverroGSelvaggiLMedicina Difensiva nella scelta del taglio cesareo [“Defensive medicine” in the choice of cesarean section]Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense200071Suppl 171772111424835
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KornackaMKKufelKCiecie cesarskie a stan noworodka [Neonatal outcome after cesarean section]Ginekol Pol201182861261721957607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar