36
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Wine rating scales: Assessing their utility for producers, consumers, and oenologic researchers

&
Pages 73-83 | Published online: 26 Feb 2009

References

  • Amerine MA, Roessler EB. Wines: Their sensory evaluation. New York: WH Freeman; 1983.
  • Kaufman, AS. Do low levels of lead produce IQ loss in children? A careful examination of the literature. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2001;16:303–341.
  • Cicchetti DV, Showalter D, Tyrer P. The effect of number of rating scale categories upon levels of interrater reliability: A Monte Carlo investigation. Appl Psychol Meas. 1985;9:31–36.
  • Preston CC, Colman AM. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica. 2000;104:1–15.
  • Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;23:37–46.
  • Fleiss JL, Cohen J, Everitt BS. Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. Psychol Bull. 1969;72:323–327.
  • Cohen J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968; 70:213–220.
  • Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Reports. 1966;19:3–11.
  • Bartko JJ. Corrective note to: “the intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability.” Psychol Reports. 1974;34:418.
  • Fleiss JL. Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait. Biometrics. 1975;31:651–659.
  • Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas. 1973;33:613–619.
  • Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley: 1981.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
  • Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SS. Developing criteria for establishing inter-rater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic. 1981;86:127–137.
  • Cicchetti DV. Heavens R. RATCAT (Rater Agreement/Categorical Data). Am Stat. 1979;33:91.
  • Heavens RH Jr, Cicchetti DV. A computer program for calculating rater agreement and bias statistics using contingency table input. Proc Amer Stat Assoc (Stat Computing Sec). 1978;21:366–370.
  • Cicchetti DV, Showalter D. A computer program for determining the reliability of dimensionally scaled data when the numbers and specific sets of examiners may vary at each assessment. Educ Psychol Meas. 1988;48:717–720.
  • Cicchetti A, Cicchetti D. The balancing act in consistent wine tasting and wine appreciation: A tale told by two brothers. Part 1: Consistency in wine tasting and appreciation: a personal-experiential perspective. J Wine Res. 2009;19:115–121.
  • Cicchetti DV. Who won the 1976 blind tasting of French bordeaux and American cabernets? Parametrics to the rescue. J Wine Res. 2004;15:211–220.
  • Cicchetti DV. The Paris wine tastings visited once more. J Wine Econ. 2006;1:125–140.
  • Cicchetti DV. Assessing the reliability of blind wine tasting. J Wine Econ. 2007;2:196–202.
  • Hodgson RT. An examination of judge reliability at a major US wine competition. J Wine Econ. 2009;3:10–113.