An overview of the biodynamic wine sector

References

• Sirieix L, Remaud H. Consumer perceptions of eco-friendly vs. conventional wines in Australia. Presented at: 5th International Academy of Wine Business Research Conference; February 8-10. Auckland: 2010. Available from: http://academyofwinebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/SirieixRemaud-Consumer-perceptions-of-eco-friendly-wines.pdf. Accessed July 5, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes SL, Cohen DA, Cullen R, Wratten SD, Fountain J. Consumer attitudes regarding environmentally sustainable wine: an exploratory study of the New Zealand marketplace. J Clean Prod. 2009;17(13):1195–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villanueva-Rey P, Vazquez-Rowe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G. Comparative life cycle assessment in the wine sector: biodynamic vs. conventional viticulture activities in NW Spain. J Clean Prod. 2014;65:330–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashkaran S, Polonsky M, Cary J, Fernandez S. Environmentally sustainable food production and marketing. Opportunity or hype? Br Food J. 2006;108(8):677–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyns E, Herbst F, Bruwer J. The relevance and acceptance of green wines in South Africa: some marketing insights. J Wine Res. 2014;25(4):243–264.
   Google Scholar
• Gabzdylova B, Raffensperger JF, Castka P. Sustainability in the New Zealand wine industry: drivers, stakeholders and practices. J Clean Prod. 2009;17:992–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller S, Remaud H. Are Australian wine consumers becoming more environmentally conscious? Robustness of latent preference segments over time. Proceedings of the 5th International Academy of Wine Business Research Conference; February 8-10. Auckland: 2010. Available from: http://academyofwinebusiness.com/. Accessed July 1, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Castellini A, Mauracher C, Procidano I, Sacchi G. Italian market of organic wine: a survey on production system characteristics and marketing strategies. Wine Econ Policy. 2014;3(2):71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Winemonitor.it. [homepage on the Internet]. Bologna (IT): Nomisma Society for Economic Studies (Agricultural and Food Research Unit). 2016. Available from: http://www.winemonitor.it/en/. Accessed July 20, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mariani A, Vastola A. Sustainable winegrowing: current perspectives. Int J Wine Res. 2015;2015(7):37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Vastola A, Tanyeri-Abur A, [homepage on the Internet]. Non-Conventional Viticulture as a Viable System: A Case Study in Italy. American Association of Wine Economists Working Paper; 2009. Available from: www.wine-economics.org/. Accessed June 9, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Winefolly.com [homepage on the internet]. Creative Commons BY-NC-SA. Seattle, WA: Wine Folly, llc; 2016. Available from: www.winefolly.com. Accessed July 12, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Norman A. Cosmic flavour, spiritual nutrition? The biodynamic agricultural method and the legacy of Rudolf Steiner’s anthroposophy in viticulture. In: Cusack C, Norman A., editors. Handbook of new religions and cultural production. Leiden: Brill; 2012: 213-234
   Google Scholar
• Kirchmann H. Biological dynamic farming – an occult form of alternative agriculture? J Agric Environ Ethics. 1994;7(2):173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly JK. Why are Top Winemakers Burying Cow Horns Filled with Manure on the Equinox? Because it Seems to Help Make Great Wine. Fortune Magazine; 2004. Available from: http://www.biodynamics.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/FortuneBiodynamics1.pdf. Accessed July 11, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips JC, Rodriguez LP. Beyond organic: an overview of biodynamic agriculture with case examples. Paper prepared for presentation at: the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting; July 23-26. Long Beach, CA: 2006. Available from: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/21036/1/sp06ph02.pdf. Accessed June 9, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner R. Agriculture. A Course of Eight Lectures. London: Bio-dynamic Agricultural Association Rudolph Steiner House; 2016. Available from: www.biodynamics.com. Accessed 7 June, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Demeter.net. [homepage on the Internet]. Demeter-International e.V. Darmstadt: 2016. Available from: www.demeter.net/. Accessed July 25, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Demeter-International [homepage on the Internet]. Production Standards for the use of Demeter, Biodynamic® and related trademarks. June 2015 to be implemented by each member country by 1st July 2016. 2016. Available from: http://www.demeter.net/. Accessed April 22, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Demeter-International [homepage on the Internet]. Processing Standards for the use of Demeter, Biodynamic® and related trademarks. June 2015 to be implemented by each member country by 1st July 2016. 2016. Available from: http://www.demeter.net/. Accessed April 22, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Demeter-International [homepage on the Internet]. Labelling Standards for the use of Demeter, Biodynamic® and related trademarks. As at June 2015 to be implemented by each member country by 1st July 2016. 2016. Available from: http://www.demeter.net/. Accessed April 22, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Novaes Zilber S, Friel D, Machado do Nascimento LF. Organic wine production: the case of Bodega Colomé in Argentina. Int J Wine Bus Res. 2010;22(2):164–177.
   Google Scholar
• FiBL, IFOAM [homepage on the Internet]. The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends. 2016. Available from: https://fibl.org/. Accessed July15, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• IFOAM EU GROUP [homepage on the Internet]. Organic in Europe. Prospects and Developments. 2016. Available from: www.ifoam-eu.org/. Accessed July 15, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner G. Biodynamic Viticulture. Making Man the Foundation. 2016. Available from: www.aloislageder.eu/. Accessed May 25, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Delmas MA, Grant LE. Eco-Labeling Strategies: The Eco-Premium Puzzle in the Wine Industry. Institute for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research; 2008. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4qv7c61b. Accessed 7 June, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Formánková S, Tomšík P, Chládková H. Key factors influencing organic viticulture in the Czech Republic. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on People, Buildings and Environment; October 15–17. Kroměříž: Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering; 2014:89.
   Google Scholar
• Santini C, Gillinsky A, Cavicchi A, Claps M. A vision, a wine and a shining Star in the shadow of Montalcino: the story of a biodynamic pioneer in the heart of Tuscany. Presented at: the 6th AWBR International Conference; June 9-10. Bordeaux: 2011. Available from: http://www.academia.edu/1167391/. Accessed June 20, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis W, Goodman S. To Niche or not to Niche. Aust New Zeal Grapegrower Winemaker J. 2003:106–111.
   Google Scholar
• Masson P. De l’agrobiologie à la viticulture biodynamique. In: Lamine C, Bellon S, editors. L’agriculture biodynamic. Transitions vers l’agriculture biologique. Pratiques et accompagnements pour des systèmes innovants. France: Editions Quae/èducagri editions; 2009;139.
   Google Scholar
• Vecchio R. Determinants of willingness-to-pay for sustainable wine: evidence from experimental auctions. Wine Econ Policy. 2013;2(2):85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Jonis M, Soltz H, Schmid O, Hofmann U, Trioli G. Analysis of organic wine market needs. Presented at: the 16th IFOAM Organic World Congress; June 16-20. Modena: 2008. Available from: http://orgprints.org/12161/. Accessed July 11, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Stolz H, Schmidt O. Consumer attitudes and expectations of organic wine. Presented at: the 16th IFOAM Organic World Congress; June 16-20. Modena: 2008. Available from: http://orgprints.org/13974/. Accessed July 10, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago I, Johnston L. Comparing the costs of biodynamic and conventional viticulture in Australia: a recent study. Wine Vitic J. 2011;26(1):61–64.
   Google Scholar
• Delmas M, Doctori-Blass V, Shuster K. Ceago Vinegarden: How Green is Your Wine? Environmental Differentiation Strategy Through Eco-labels. American Association of Wine Economists Working Paper; 2008:32. Available from: http://www.wine-economics.org/. Accessed July 4, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Delmas MA, Grant LE. Eco-labeling strategies and price-premium: the wine industry puzzle. Bus Soc. 2014;53(1):6–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Fassiotto M. Category signaling reputation. Organ Sci. 2015;26(2):584–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough M, Qenani E, MacDougall N. Biodynamic practices, eco-label wines and Millennial consumers. J Agric Sci Technol A. 2012;2(12A):1364.
   Google Scholar
• Rossetto L. Marketing strategies for organic wine growers in the Veneto region 2002. 8th Joint Conference on Food, Agriculture and Environment; August 25–28. Red Cedar Lake, WI: 2002. Available from: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/. Accessed June 16, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Berghoef N, Dodds R. Potential for sustainability eco-labeling in Ontario’s wine industry. Int J Wine Bus Res. 2011;23(4):298–317.
   Google Scholar
• Lockshin L, Corsi AM. Consumer behaviour for wine 2.0: a review since 2003 and future directions. Wine Econ Policy. 2012;1(1):2–23.
   Google Scholar
• Mann S, Ferjani A, Reissig L. What matters to consumers of organic wine? Br Food J. 2012;114(2):272–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollá-Bauzá MB, Martinez-Carrasco L, Martínez-Poveda A, Pérez MR. Determination of the surplus that consumers are willing to pay for an organic wine. Span J Agric Res. 2005;3(1):43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pink M. The sustainable wine market in Europe–introduction to a market trend and its issues. Acta Sci Pol Oeconomia. 2015;14(2):131–142.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller Loose S, Remaud H. Impact of corporate social responsibility claims on consumer food choice: a cross-cultural comparison. Br Food J. 2013;115(1):142–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomarici E, Vecchio R. Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: an exploratory study on Italian consumers. J Clean Prod. 2014;66:537–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casini L, Cavicchi A, Corsi A, Santini C. Hopelessly devoted to sustainability: marketing challenges to face in the wine business. Proceedings of the 119th European Association of Agricultural Economists Seminar; June 30-July 2. Capri: 2010. Available from: www.academia.edu/398135/. Accessed June 1, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Barber N. Consumers’ intention to purchase environmentally friendly wines: a segmentation approach. Int J Hospit Tourism Admin. 2012;13(1):26–47.
   Google Scholar
• Barber N, Taylor C, Strick S. Wine consumers’ environmental knowledge and attitudes: influence on willingness to purchase. Int J Wine Res. 2009;1(1):59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Fotopoulos C, Krystallis A, Ness M. Wine produced by organic grapes in Greece: using means – end chains analysis to reveal organic buyers’ purchasing motives in comparison to the non-buyers. Food Qual Prefer. 2003;14(7):549–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen J, Thach E, Hemphill E. The impact of environmental protection and hedonistic values on organic wine purchases in the US. Int J Wine Bus Res. 2012;24:47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Pomarici E, Amato M, Vecchio R. Environmental friendly wines: a consumer segmentation study. Agric Agric Sci Procedia. 2016;8:534–541.
   Google Scholar
• Remaud H, Mueller S, Chvyl P, Lockshin L. Do Australian wine consumers value organic wine? Proceedings of the International Conference of the Academy of Wine Business Research; July 17–19. Siena: 2008. Available from: http://academyofwinebusiness.com/. Accessed June 1, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schmit TM, Rickard BJ, Taber J. Consumer valuation of environmentally friendly production practices in wines, considering asymmetric information and sensory effects. J Agric Econ. 2013;64(2):483–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugarolas M, Martínez-Carrasco L, Martínez A, Rico M. Determination of the surplus that consumers are willing to pay for an organic wine. Span J Agric Res. 2005;3(1):43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers R. Would you pay a price premium for a sustainable wine? The voice of the Spanish consumer. Agric Agric Sci Procedia. 2016;8:10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sogari G, Mora C, Menozzi D. Factors driving sustainable choice: the case of wine. Br Food J. 2016;118(3):632–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreiro-Hurlé J, Colombo S, Cantos-Villar E. Is there a market for functional wines? Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for resveratrol-enriched red wine. Food Qual Prefer. 2008;19(4):360–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro ML. Rethinking new wines: implications of local and environmentally friendly labels. Food Policy. 2003;28:547–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeir I, Verbeke W. Sustainable food consumption: exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2006;19(2):169–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner KD. The quality of sustainability: agroecological partnerships and the geographic branding of California winegrapes. J Rural Stud. 2007;23:142–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockshin L. Marketing of bio-orgo-carbon-neutral-enviro-sustainable-fair-trade-dynamic wine. Proceedings of the Symposium on Sustainability in Vineyards and Wineries; February 7-9. Osage Beach: Midwest Grape and Wine Conference; 2009;49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hughner RS, McDonagh P, Prothero A, Shultz CJ, Stanton J. Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. J Consum Behav. 2007;6(2–3):94–110.
   Google Scholar
• Siderer Y, Maquet A, Anklam E. Need for research to support consumer confidence in the growing organic food market. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2005;16(8):332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szolnoki G, Bosman J, Samara O, et al. A cross-cultural comparison of sustainability in the wine industry. Proceedings of the 6th AWBR International Conference; June 9-10. Bordeaux: 2011. Available from: http://academyofwinebusiness.com/. Accessed July 5, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak LI, Washburn JH. Building brand equity: consumer reactions to proactive environmental policies by the winery. Int J Wine Market. 2002;14(3):5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zucca G, Smith DE, Mitry DJ. Sustainable viticulture and winery practices in California: what is it, and do customers care. Int J Wine Res. 2009;2(1):193.
   Google Scholar
• Borra D, Viberti A, Massaglia S, Dal Vecchio A. Sustainability of Italian wines: knowledge, understanding, and interest of consumers. BIO Web of Conferences. Vol. 3. 2014:3003. Available from: http://www.bio-conferences.org/. Accessed July 5, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ginon E, Ares G, dos Santos Laboissière LHE, Brouard J, Issanchou S, Deliza R. Logos indicating environmental sustainability in wine production: an exploratory study on how do Burgundy wine consumers perceive them. Food Res Intern. 2014;62:837–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troiano S, Marangon F, Tempesta T, Vecchiato D. Organic vs local claims: substitutes or complements for wine consumers? A marketing analysis with a discrete choice experiment. New Medit. 2016;15(2):14–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmas M. Perception of Eco-Labels: Organic and Biodynamic Wines. Working paper UCLA Institute of the Environment; 2008. Available from: http://www.erb.umich.edu/. Accessed June 23, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley K, Hyde J, Bruwer J. US wine consumer preferences for bottle characteristics, back label extrinsic cues and wine composition: a conjoint analysis. Asia Pac J Mark Logistics. 2015;27(4):516–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parpinello GP, Rombolà AD, Simoni M, Versari A. Chemical and sensory characterisation of Sangiovese red wines: comparison between biodynamic and organic management. Food Chem. 2015;167:145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross CF, Weller KM, Blue RB, Reganold JP. Difference testing of Merlot produced from biodynamically and organically grown wine grapes. J Wine Res. 2009;20(2):85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve JR, Carpenter-Boggs L, Reganold JP, York AL, McGourty G, McCloskey LP. Soil and winegrape quality in biodynamically and organically managed vineyards. Am J Enol Vitic. 2005;56(4):367–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szolnoki G. A cross-national comparison of sustainability in the wine industry. J Clean Prod. 2013;53:243–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reganold JP, Palmer AS, Lockhart JC, Macgregor AN. Soil quality and financial performance of biodynamic and conventional farms in New Zealand. Science. 1993;260(5106):344–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colman T, Päster P. Red, White, and “Green”: The Cost of Carbon in the Global Wine Trade. AAWE Working Paper; 2007. Available from: www.wine-economics.org/. Accessed July 13, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pullman ME, Maloni MJ, Dillard J. Sustainability practices in food supply chains: how is wine different? J Wine Res. 2010;21(1):35–56.
   Google Scholar