161
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Identification and Validation of Hemophilia-Related Outcomes on Japanese Electronic Medical Record Database (Hemophilia-REAL V Study)

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 571-580 | Published online: 06 Jul 2021

References

  • Bolton-Maggs PH, Pasi KJ. Haemophilias A and B. Lancet. 2003;361(9371):1801–1809. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13405-8
  • Carcao MD. The diagnosis and management of congenital hemophilia. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2012;38(7):727–734. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1326786
  • Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, et al. Guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia. 2013;19(1):e1–47.
  • Berntorp E, Shapiro AD. Modern haemophilia care. Lancet. 2012;379(9824):1447–1456. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61139-2
  • National Research Council. The Learning Healthcare System: workshop Summary (IOM Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.
  • Berger ML, Mamdani M, Atkins D, Johnson ML. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1044–1052. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00600.x
  • Wang M, Cyhaniuk A, Cooper DL, Iyer NN. Identification of patients with congenital hemophilia in a large electronic health record database. J Blood Med. 2017;8:131–139. doi:10.2147/JBM.S133616
  • Lyons J, Desai V, Xu Y, et al. Development and validation of an algorithm for identifying patients with hemophilia A in an administrative claims database. Value Health. 2018;21(9):1098–1103. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.008
  • Health, Clinic, and Education Information Evaluation Institute. Secondary use of the RWD database. Available from: https://www.hcei.or.jp/page/application. Accessed February 25, 2021.
  • Fujiwara T, Okamoto H, Ohnishi Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of lateral neck radiography in ruling out supraglottitis: a prospective observational study. Emerg Med J. 2015;32(5):348–352. doi:10.1136/emermed-2013-203340
  • Iwagami M, Aoki K, Akazawa M, et al. Validation study using administrative data in Japan Task Force Report. Available from: http://www.jspe.jp/committee/pdf/validationtrr120180523.pdf. Accessed July 18, 2019.
  • Benchimol EI, Manuel DG, To T, Griffiths AM, Rabeneck L, Guttmann A. Development and use of reporting guidelines for assessing the quality of validation studies of health administrative data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(8):821–829. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.006
  • Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015;351:h5527. doi:10.1136/bmj.h5527
  • Widdifield J, Ivers NM, Young J, et al. Development and validation of an administrative data algorithm to estimate the disease burden and epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Ontario, Canada. Mult Scler. 2015;21(8):1045–1054. doi:10.1177/1352458514556303
  • Kumamaru H, Judd SE, Curtis JR, et al. Validity of claims-based stroke algorithms in contemporary Medicare data: reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke (REGARDS) study linked with medicare claims. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7(4):611–619. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000743
  • Yamada K, Itoh M, Fujimura Y, et al. The utilization and challenges of Japan’s MID-NET ® medical information database network in postmarketing drug safety assessments: a summary of pilot pharmacoepidemiological studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019;28(5):601–608. doi:10.1002/pds.4777
  • Koram N, Delgado M, Stark JH, et al. Validation studies of claims data in the Asia-Pacific region: a comprehensive review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019;28(2):156–170. doi:10.1002/pds.4616