Characterization of the inflammatory response to four commercial bone graft substitutes using a murine biocompatibility model

David C Markel1 Department of Orthopaedics, Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, Southfield, MI

S Trent Guthrie2 Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI

Bin Wu3 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

Zheng Song4 Orthopaedic Research Institute, Wichita, KS, USA

Paul H Wooley4 Orthopaedic Research Institute, Wichita, KS, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Pages 13-18 | Published online: 18 Jan 2012

Cite this article

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

FinkemeierCGBone-grafting and bone-graft substitutesJ Bone Joint Surg Am200284-A45446411886919
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
IwataHSakanoSItohTBauerTWDemineralized bone matrix and native bone morphogenetic protein in orthopaedic surgeryClin Orthop Relat Res20023959910911937869
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
UristMRBone: formation by autoinductionScience19651508938995319761
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BauerTWMuschlerGFBone graft materials. An overview of the basic scienceClin Orthop Relat Res2000371102710693546
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BucholzRWNonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutesClin Orthop Relat Res2002395445211937865
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
VaccaroARChibaKHellerJGBone grafting alternatives in spinal surgerySpine J2002220621514589495
PubMedGoogle Scholar
OakesDALeeCCLiebermanJRAn evaluation of human demineralized bone matrices in a rat femoral defect modelClin Orthop Relat Res200341328129012897620
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
EinhornTALaneJMBursteinAHKopmanCRVigoritaVJThe healing of segmental bone defects induced by demineralized bone matrix. A radiographic and biomechanical studyJ Bone Joint Surg Am1984662742796693455
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HanBTangBNimniMEQuantitative and sensitive in vitro assay for osteoinductive activity of demineralized bone matrixJ Orthop Res20032164865412798064
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
EdwardsJTDiegmannMHScarboroughNLOsteoinduction of human demineralized bone: characterization in a rat modelClin Orthop Relat Res19983572192289917720
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AnHSSimpsonJMGloverJMStephanyJComparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion. A prospective multicenter studySpine199520221122168545714
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FeighanJEDavyDPrewettABStevensonSInduction of bone by a demineralized bone matrix gel: a study in a rat femoral defect modelJ Orthop Res1995138818918544025
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LaddALPliamNBUse of bone-graft substitutes in distal radius fracturesJ Am Acad Orthop Surg1999727929010504355
PubMedGoogle Scholar
RussellJLBlockJEClinical utility of demineralized bone matrix for osseous defects, arthrodesis, and reconstruction: impact of processing techniques and study methodologyOrthopedics19992252453110348114
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
YoonSTBodenSDOsteoinductive molecules in orthopaedics: basic science and preclinical studiesClin Orthop Relat Res2002395334311937864
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BostromMPYangXKennanMSandhuHDicarloELaneJMAn unexpected outcome during testing of commercially available demineralized bone graft materials: how safe are the nonallograft componentsSpine2001261425142811458144
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WangJCKanimLENagakawaISYamaneBHVintersHVDawsonEGDose-dependent toxicity of a commercially available demineralized bone matrix materialSpine2001261429143511458146
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SeehermanHLiRWozneyJA review of preclinical program development for evaluating injectable carriers for osteogenic factorsJ Bone Joint Surg Am200385-A9610812925616
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WooleyPHMorrenRAndaryJInflammatory responses to orthopaedic biomaterials in the murine air pouchBiomaterials20022351752611761173
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
OttavianiRAWooleyPSongZMarkelDCInflammatory and immunological responses to hyaluronan preparations: study of a murine biocompatibility modelJ Bone Joint Surg Am20078914815717200322
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MaddoxEZhanMMundyGRDrohanWNBurgessWHOptimizing human demineralized bone matrix for clinical applicationTissue Eng2000644144810992439
PubMedGoogle Scholar
TakikawaSBauerTWKambicHTogawaDComparative evaluation of the osteoinductivity of two formulations of human demineralized bone matrixJ Biomed Mater Res A200365374212635152
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SwensonCLArnoczkySPDemineralization for inactivation of infectious retrovirus in systemically infected cortical bone: in vitro and in vivo experimental studiesJ Bone Joint Surg Am200385-A32333212571312
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ad Hoc Working Party on Biotechnology/PharmacyValidation of virus removal and inactivation proceduresPharmacol Toxicol1991691441481775434
PubMedGoogle Scholar
PinholtEMSolheimEOsteoinductive potential of demineralized rat bone increases with increasing donor age from birth to adulthoodJ Craniofac Surg199891421469586543
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Nyssen-BehetsCDelaereODuchesnePYDhemAAging effect on inductive capacity of human demineralized bone matrixArch Orthop Trauma Surg19961153033068905101
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DamienCJParsonsJRPrewettABRietveldDCZimmermanMCInvestigation of an organic delivery system for demineralized bone matrix in a delayed-healing cranial defect modelJ Biomed Mater Res1994285535618027096
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
JazayeriMANichterLSZhouZYWelliszTCheungDTComparison of various delivery systems for demineralized bone matrix in a rat cranial defect modelJ Craniofac Surg199451721787803589
PubMedGoogle Scholar
PetersonBWhangPGIglesiasRWangJCLiebermanJROsteoinductivity of commercially available demineralized bone matrix. Preparations in a spine fusion modelJ Bone Joint Surg Am200486-A2243225015466734
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Characterization of the inflammatory response to four commercial bone graft substitutes using a murine biocompatibility model

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Characterization of the inflammatory response to four commercial bone graft substitutes using a murine biocompatibility model

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date