62
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Potential Role of Intrapulmonary Concomitant Lesions in Differentiating Non-Neoplastic and Neoplastic Ground Glass Nodules

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 6155-6166 | Received 27 Aug 2023, Accepted 06 Dec 2023, Published online: 12 Dec 2023

References

  • Kim TJ, Goo JM, Lee KW, Park CM, Lee HJ. Clinical, pathological and thin-section CT features of persistent multiple ground-glass opacity nodules: comparison with solitary ground-glass opacity nodule. Lung Cancer. 2009;64(2):171–178. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.08.002
  • Chu ZG, Li WJ, Fu BJ, Lv FJ. CT Characteristics for Predicting Invasiveness in Pulmonary Pure Ground-Glass Nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215(2):351–358. doi:10.2214/AJR.19.22381
  • Qin Y, Xu Y, Ma D, et al. Clinical characteristics of resected solitary ground-glass opacities: comparison between benign and malignant nodules. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11(10):2767–2774. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.13575
  • Ye X, Fan W, Wang Z, et al. Expert consensus on thermal ablation therapy of pulmonary subsolid nodules (2021 Edition). J Cancer Res Ther. 2021;17(5):1141–1156. doi:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1485_21
  • Zhang Y, Fu F, Chen H. Management of Ground-Glass Opacities in the Lung Cancer Spectrum. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110(6):1796–1804. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.094
  • Fan L, Liu SY, Li QC, Yu H, Xiao XS. Multidetector CT features of pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity: differences between benign and malignant. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1015):897–904. doi:10.1259/bjr/33150223
  • Kim HY, Shim YM, Lee KS, Han J, Yi CA, Kim YK. Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histopathologic comparisons. Radiology. 2007;245(1):267–275. doi:10.1148/radiol.2451061682
  • Felix L, Serra-Tosio G, Lantuejoul S, et al. CT characteristics of resolving ground-glass opacities in a lung cancer screening programme. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77(3):410–416. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.008
  • He XQ, Li X, Wu Y, et al. Differential Diagnosis of Nonabsorbable Inflammatory and Malignant Subsolid Nodules with a Solid Component ≤5 mm. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:1785–1796. doi:10.2147/JIR.S355848
  • Gao F, Sun Y, Zhang G, Zheng X, Li M, Hua Y. CT characterization of different pathological types of subcentimeter pulmonary ground-glass nodular lesions. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1094):20180204. doi:10.1259/bjr.20180204
  • Hu X, Ye W, Li Z, et al. Non-invasive evaluation for benign and malignant subcentimeter pulmonary ground-glass nodules (≤1 cm) based on CT texture analysis. Br J Radiol. 2020;93(1114):20190762. doi:10.1259/bjr.20190762
  • Mei X, Wang R, Yang W, et al. Predicting malignancy of pulmonary ground-glass nodules and their invasiveness by random forest. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(1):458–463. doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.01.88
  • Hu H, Wang Q, Tang H, Xiong L, Lin Q. Multi-slice computed tomography characteristics of solitary pulmonary ground-glass nodules: differences between malignant and benign. Thorac Cancer. 2016;7(1):80–87. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.12280
  • Gao F, Li M, Ge X, et al. Multi-detector spiral CT study of the relationships between pulmonary ground-glass nodules and blood vessels. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(12):3271–3277. doi:10.1007/s00330-013-2954-3
  • Fu BJ, Lv FJ, Li WJ, Lin RY, Zheng YN, Chu ZG. Significance of intra-nodular vessel sign in differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary ground-glass nodules. Insights Imaging. 2021;12(1):65 doi:10.1186/s13244-021-01012-7.
  • Li F, Sone S, Abe H, Macmahon H, Doi K. Malignant versus benign nodules at CT screening for lung cancer: comparison of thin-section CT findings. Radiology. 2004;233(3):793–798. doi:10.1148/radiol.2333031018
  • de Oliveira CV, Horvat N, Testagrossa LA, Romão DDS, Rassi MB, Lee HJ. Etiological profile and main imaging findings in patients with granulomatous diseases who underwent lung biopsy. Eur J Radiol Open. 2021;8:100325. doi:10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100325
  • Fu G, Yu H, Liu J, et al. Arc concave sign on thin-section computed tomography:A novel predictor for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma in pure ground-glass nodules. Eur J Radiol. 2021;139:109683. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109683
  • Wu F, Tian SP, Jin X, et al. CT and histopathologic characteristics of lung adenocarcinoma with pure ground-glass nodules 10 mm or less in diameter. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(10):4037–4043. doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4829-5
  • Hsu JS, Han IT, Tsai TH, et al. Pleural Tags on CT Scans to Predict Visceral Pleural Invasion of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Does Not Abut the Pleura. Radiology. 2016;279(2):590–596. doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151120
  • Liu LH, Liu M, Wei R, et al. CT findings of persistent pure ground glass opacity: can we predict the invasiveness? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(5):1925–1928. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.5.1925
  • Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008;246(3):697–722. doi:10.1148/radiol.2462070712
  • Liang ZR, Ye M, Lv FJ, et al. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant patchy ground-glass opacity by thin-section computed tomography. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):1206. doi:10.1186/s12885-022-10338-4
  • Franquet T. Imaging of Community-acquired Pneumonia. J Thorac Imaging. 2018;33(5):282–294. doi:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000347
  • Li WJ, Lv FJ, Tan YW, Fu BJ, Chu ZG. Pulmonary Benign Ground-Glass Nodules: CT Features and Pathological Findings. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:581–590. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S298517
  • Wang X, Wu M, Shen H, et al. Comparison of Clinical and Pathological Characteristics Between Extremely Multiple GGNs and Single GGNs. Front Oncol. 2021;11:725475. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.725475
  • Xie S, Li S, Deng H, Han Y, Liu G, Liu Q. Application Value of PET/CT and MRI in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Synchronous Multiple Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules. Front Oncol. 2022;12:797823. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.797823
  • Sato Y, Fujimoto D, Morimoto T, et al. Natural history and clinical characteristics of multiple pulmonary nodules with ground glass opacity. Respirology. 2017;22(8):1615–1621. doi:10.1111/resp.13089