Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods

References

• HennekensCHBuringJEEpidemiology in MedicineBostonLittle, Brown, and Company1987
   Google Scholar
• GerhardTBias: considerations for research practiceAm J Health Syst Pharm200865222159216818997149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PannucciCJWilkinsEGIdentifying and avoiding bias in researchPlast Reconstr Surg2010126261962520679844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChoiBCKPakAWPBias, OverviewChichester, UKJohn Wiley and Sons, Ltd2005
   Google Scholar
• ZhuKMcKnightBStergachisADalingJRLevineRSComparison of self-report data and medical records data: results from a case-control study on prostate cancerInt J Epidemiol199928340941710405842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaguraSKangSYValidity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations: a meta-analytical reviewSubst Use Misuse1996319113111538853234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisonLThe validity of self-reported drug use in survey research: an overview and critique of research methodsHarrisonLHughesAThe Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates NIDA Research Monograph no 167Rockville, MD19971736
   Google Scholar
• DarkeSSelf-report among injecting drug users: a reviewDrug Alcohol Depend19985132532639787998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrenerNDBillyJOGGradyWRAssessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literatureJ Adolesc Health200333643645714642706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MillsJFLozaWKronerDGPredictive validity despite social desirability: evidence for the robustness of self-report among offendersCrim Behav Ment Health200613214015014624266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van de MortelTFFaking it: social desirability response bias in self-report researchAust J Adv Nurs20082544048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisonLDHughesANational Institute on Drug Abuse National Institutes of Health (US)The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey EstimatesRockville, MDUS Department of Health and Human Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Division of Epidemiology and Prevention Research1997
   Google Scholar
• SchützHGottaJCErdmannFRisseMWeilerGSimultaneous screening and detection of drugs in small blood samples and bloodstainsForensic Sci Int2002126319119612062939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LedgerwoodDMGoldbergerBARiskNKLewisCEKato PriceRComparison between self-report and hair analysis of illicit drug use in a community sample of middle-aged menAddict Behav20083391131113918547737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StephensRThe truthfulness of addict respondents in research projectsInt J Addict1972735495584343625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KassinSMDrorIEKukuckaJThe forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutionsJ Appl Res Mem Cogn2013214252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrowneDPMarloweDA new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathologyJ Consult Psychol19602434935413813058
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PaulhusDLMeasurement and control of response biasRobinsonJPShaverPRWrightsmanLSMeasures of Personality and Social Psychological AttitudesSan Diego, CAAcademic Press1991
   Google Scholar
• HolmbergLOhlanderEMByersTA search for recall bias in a case-control study of diet and breast cancerInt J Epidemiol19962522352449119547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NeugebauerRNgSDifferential recall as a source of bias in epidemiologic researchJ Clin Epidemiol19904312133713412254770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KipKECohenFColeSRHerpetic Eye Disease Study GroupRecall bias in a prospective cohort study of acute time-varying exposures: example from the herpetic eye disease studyJ Clin Epidemiol200154548248711337211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FullerWAMeasurement Error ModelsNew YorkJohn Wiley and Sons, Inc1987
   Google Scholar
• NusserSMFullerWAGuentherPMEstimating usual dietary intake distributions: adjusting for measurement error and nonnormality in 24-hour food intake dataLybergLBiemerPCollinsMDe LeeuwEDippoCSchwarzNTrewinDSurvey Measurement and Process QualityHoboken, NJJohn Wiley and Sons, Inc1997
   Google Scholar
• PaeratakulSPopkinBMKohlmeierLHertz-PicciottoIGuoXEdwardsLJMeasurement error in dietary data: implications for the epidemiologic study of the diet-disease relationshipEur J Clin Nutr199852107227279805218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RibičCHZakotnikJMVertnikLVegnutiMCappuccioFPSalt intake of the Slovene population assessed by 24 h urinary sodium excretionPublic Health Nutr201013111803180920196911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BryantHEVisserNLoveEJRecords, recall loss, and recall bias in pregnancy: a comparison of interview and medical records data of pregnant and postnatal womenAm J Public Health198979178802909189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FeldmanYKorenGMatticeDShearHPellegriniEMacLeodSMDeterminants of recall and recall bias in studying drug and chemical exposure in pregnancyTeratology198940137452763209
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CoughlinSSRecall bias in epidemiologic studiesJ Clin Epidemiol199043187912319285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeinstockMAColditzGAWillettWCStampferMJRosnerBSpeizerFERecall (report) bias and reliability in the retrospective assessment of melanoma riskAm J Epidemiol199113332402452000841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paganini-HillAChaoAAccuracy of recall of hip fracture, heart attack, and cancer: a comparison of postal survey data and medical recordsAm J Epidemiol199313821011068342528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BiemerPPGrovesRMLybergLEMathiowetzNASudmanSMeasurement Errors in SurveysHoboken, NJJohn Wiley and Sons, Inc1991
   Google Scholar
• CarrollRJFreedmanLSKipnisVMeasurement error and dietary intakeAdv Exp Med Biol19984451391459781387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThomsonCAGiulianoARockCLMeasuring dietary change in a diet intervention trial: comparing food frequency questionnaire and dietary recallsAm J Epidemiol2003157875476212697580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarrollRJRuppertDStefanskiLACrainiceanuCMMeasurement Error in Nonlinear Models2nd edNew YorkChapman and Hall2006
   Google Scholar
• AlthubaitiADonevANMixture experiments with mixing errorsJ Stat Plan Infer20111412692700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlthubaitiADonevANon-Gaussian Berkson errors in bioassayStat Methods Med Res201625143044523070587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OkuraYUrbanLHMahoneyDWJacobsenSJRodehefferRJAgreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failureJ Clin Epidemiol200457101096110315528061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GullbergRGEstimating the measurement uncertainty in forensic blood alcohol analysisJ Anal Toxicol201236315316122417830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoroniRBlomstedtPWilhelmLReinikainenTSippolaECoranderJStatistical modelling of measurement errors in gas chromatographic analyses of blood alcohol contentForensic Sci Int20102021–3717420494532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DrorIECharltonDWhy experts make errorsJ Forensic Ident2006564600616
   Google Scholar
• GullbergRGEstimating the measurement uncertainty in forensic breath-alcohol analysisAccred Qual Assur20061111562568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DrorIRosenthalRMeta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic expertsJ Forensic Sci200853490090318489557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarrollRJMeasurement error in epidemiologic studiesArmitagePColtonTEncyclopedia of BiostatisticsNew YorkJohn Wiley and Sons199824912519
   Google Scholar
• NickersonRSConfirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guisesRev Gen Psychol199822175220
   Google Scholar
• BernerESGraberMLOverconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicineAm J Med20081215 SupplS2S2318440350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CroskerryPThe importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize themAcad Med200378877578012915363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReidMCLachsMSFeinsteinARUse of methodological standards in diagnostic test researchJAMA199527486456517637146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HillCMemonAMcGeorgePThe role of confirmation bias in suspect interviews: A systematic evaluationLegal Criminal Psych2010132357371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ButtLThe forensic confirmation bias: problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions – Commentary by a forensic examinerJ Appl Res Mem Cogn2013215960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NakhaeizadehSDrorIEMorganRMCognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation biasSci Justice201454320821424796950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear-SmithFAvan DrielMLArrollBDel MarCAnalysis of decisions made in meta-analyses of depression screening and the risk of confirmation bias: a case studyBMC Med Res Methodol2012127622691262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BudowleBBottrellMCBunchSGA perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancementJ Forensic Sci200954479880919486241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RassinEIndividual differences in the susceptibility to confirmation biasNeth J Psychol20086428793
   Google Scholar
• PowellMBHughes-ScholesCHSharmanSJSkill in interviewing reduces confirmation biasJ Investig Psych Offender Profil201292126134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DrorIEBusemeyerJRBasolaBDecision making under time pressure: an independent test of sequential sampling modelsMem Cognit1999274713725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar