How multidisciplinary are multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care? An observational study in oncology departments in Flanders, Belgium

References

• FleissigAJenkinsVCattSFallowfieldLMultidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK?Lancet Oncol200671193594317081919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VinodSKSidhomMADelaneyGPDo multidisciplinary meetings follow guideline-based care?J Oncol Pract20106627628121358954
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van BelleSHow to implement the multidisciplinary approach in prostate cancer management: the Belgian modelBJU Int2008101Suppl 224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VerhoevenDvan HoofELetoCVan den BogaertSDegjLLThe Belgian cancer planHealth Econ201046264267
   Google Scholar
• European Partnership Action Against Cancer consensus groupBorrasJMAlbrehtTPolicy statement on multidisciplinary cancer careEur J Cancer201450347548024321260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CallensMvan den OeverRQuality improvement in cancer care: the multidisciplinary oncological consultationActa Chir Belg2006106548048417168255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VrijensFKohnLDuboisCLeroyRVinckIStordeurSTen years of multidisciplinary teams meetings in oncology: current situation and perspectivesHealth Services Research (HSR) BrusselsBelgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE)2015KCE Reports 239Cs Available from: https://kce.fgov.be/sites/default/files/atoms/files/KCE_239_team%20meetings_oncology_Report_2.pdfAccessed November 30, 2018
   Google Scholar
• KeatingNLLandrumMBLamontEBBozemanSRShulmanLNMcNeilBJTumor boards and the quality of cancer careJ Natl Cancer Inst2013105211312123274388
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CrokeJMEl-SayedSMultidisciplinary management of cancer patients: chasing a shadow or real value? An overview of the literatureCurr Oncol2012194e232e23822876151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van HagenPSpaanderMCvan der GaastARotterdam Oesophageal Tumour Study GroupImpact of a multidisciplinary tumour board meeting for upper-GI malignancies on clinical decision making: a prospective cohort studyInt J Clin Oncol201318221421922193638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaoKManyaKAzadAUro-oncology multidisciplinary meetings at an Australian tertiary referral centre – impact on clinical decision-making and implications for patient inclusionBJU Int2014114Suppl 1505425070295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UngKACampbellBADuplanDBallDDavidSImpact of the lung oncology multidisciplinary team meetings on the management of patients with cancerAsia Pac J Clin Oncol2016122e298e30424674013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeffDRHoCThomasHA multidisciplinary team approach minimises prophylactic mastectomy ratesEur J Surg Oncol20154181005101225986853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidtHMRobertsJMBodnarAMThoracic multidisciplinary tumor board routinely impacts therapeutic plans in patients with lung and esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort studyAnn Thorac Surg20159951719172425678503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeeFOwenTLeathemROffering a prognosis in lung cancer: when is a team of experts an expert team?J Epidemiol Community Health200761430831317372290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambBWBrownKFNagpalKVincentCGreenJSSevdalisNQuality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic reviewAnn Surg Oncol20111882116212521442345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PillayBWoottenACCroweHThe impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: a systematic review of the literatureCancer Treat Rev201642567226643552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNairAGChohCTMetcalfeCMaximising recruitment into randomised controlled trials: the role of multidisciplinary cancer teamsEur J Cancer200844172623262618804999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StalforsJLundbergCWestinTQuality assessment of a multidisciplinary tumour meeting for patients with head and neck cancerActa Otolaryngol20071271828717364335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooryMGkoliaPYangIABowmanRVFongKMSystematic review of multidisciplinary teams in the management of lung cancerLung Cancer2008601142118304687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PradesJRemueEvan HoofEBorrasJMIs it worth reorganising cancer services on the basis of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs)? A systematic review of the objectives and organisation of MDTs and their impact on patient outcomesHealth Policy2015119446447425271171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KessonEMAllardiceGMGeorgeWDBurnsHJMorrisonDSEffects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 womenBMJ2012344e271822539013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SevdalisNGreenJSUrologic oncology: expanding the evidence for multidisciplinary team cancer careNat Rev Urol2014111266866925311676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FennellMLDasIPClauserSPetrelliNSalnerAThe organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care qualityJ Natl Cancer Inst Monogr2010201040728020386055
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TaplinSHWeaverSCholletteVTeams and teamwork during a cancer diagnosis: interdependency within and between teamsJ Oncol Pract201511323123825873059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LanceleyASavageJMenonUJacobsIInfluences on multidisciplinary team decision-makingInt J Gynecol Cancer200818221522217511801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambBWSevdalisNAroraSPintoAVincentCGreenJSTeamwork and team decision-making at multidisciplinary cancer conferences: barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for improvementWorld J Surg20113591970197621604049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaineRWallaceINic A’ BháirdCImproving the effectiveness of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a prospective observational studyHeal Serv Deliv Res20142371172
   Google Scholar
• HorlaitMVan BelleSLeysMInput of psychosocial information during multidisciplinary team meetings at medical oncology departments: protocol for an observational studyJMIR Res Protoc201872e6429483068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaysNPopeCQualitative research: observational methods in health care settingsBMJ199531169981821847613435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CreswellJWResearch Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods ApproachesThousand Oaks, CASAGE Publications2014
   Google Scholar
• MaxwellJAQualitative Research Design: An Interactive ApproachThousand Oaks, CASAGE Publications2013
   Google Scholar
• CreswellJWResearch Design: Qualitative & Quantitative ApproachesThousand Oaks, CASage Publications1994
   Google Scholar
• WilliamsMVogtWPThe SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research MethodsThousand Oaks, CASage Publications2011
   Google Scholar
• MorseJMBarrettMMayanMOlsonKSpiersJVerification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative researchInt J Qual Methods2002121322
   Google Scholar
• FinlayLBrendanGReflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciencesOxfordBlackwell Science2008
   Google Scholar
• CorbinJStraussABasics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded TheoryThousand Oaks, CASAGE Publications2014
   Google Scholar
• MilesMBHubermanAMSaldañaJQualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook3rd edThousand Oaks, CASAGE Publications
   Google Scholar
• TaylorCMunroAJGlynne-JonesRMultidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence?BMJ2010340c95120332315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WrightFCLookhongNUrbachDDavisDMcLeodRSGagliardiARMultidisciplinary cancer conferences: identifying opportunities to promote implementationAnn Surg Oncol200916102731273719662458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health UKManual for Cancer ServicesLondon2004 Available from: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120503144034/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4135596.pdfAccessed February 1, 2019
   Google Scholar
• American College of Surgeons Commission on CancerCancer Progam Standards. Rev. ed2012 Available from: https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/cancer/coc/programstandards2012.ashxAccessed February 1, 2019
   Google Scholar
• McAvoyBOptimising cancer care in AustraliaAust Fam Physician200332536937212772373
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JalilRAhmedMGreenJSSevdalisNFactors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspectiveInt J Surg201311538939423500030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RuhstallerTRoeHThürlimannBNicollJJThe multidisciplinary meeting: an indispensable aid to communication between different specialitiesEur J Cancer200642152459246216934974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KidgerJMurdochJDonovanJLBlazebyJMClinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: a qualitative studyBJOG2009116451151719250362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DewKStubbeMSignalLCancer care decision making in multidisciplinary meetingsQual Health Res201525339740725281239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambBWTaylorCLambJNFacilitators and barriers to team-working and patient centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer teams: findings of a national studyAnn Surg Oncol20132051408141623086306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HorlaitMVan BelleSLeysMMultidisciplinary team meetings at medical oncology departments: an observational study on communication and the impact of organisational structuresHorlaitMPalliative Care Communication in Oncology Departments in Flanders, BelgiumBrussels, BelgiumVUB Press2017
   Google Scholar
• AtwalACaldwellKDo all health and social care professionals interact equally: a study of interactions in multidisciplinary teams in the United KingdomScand J Caring Sci200519326827316101855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BusbyAGilchristBThe role of the nurse in the medical ward roundJ Adv Nurs19921733393461573102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LichtensteinRAlexanderJAMcCarthyJFWellsRStatus differences in cross-functional teams: effects on individual member participation, job satisfaction, and intent to quitJ Health Soc Behav200445332233515595510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NembhardIMEdmondsonACMaking it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teamsJ Organ Behav2006277941966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SatterstromPPolzerJTWeiRReframing hierarchical interactions as negotiations to promote change in health care systemsAyokoOBAshkansyNMJehnKHandbook of Conflict Management ResearchCheltenham, UKEdward Elgar Publishing2014
   Google Scholar
• RidgewayCLSocial status and group structureHoggMATindaleSRBlackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group ProcessesOxford, UKBlackwell Publishers2008352375
   Google Scholar
• SharmaRAShahKGlatsteinEMultidisciplinary team meetings: what does the future hold for the flies raised in Wittgenstein’s bottle?Lancet Oncol2009102989919185826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambBWSevdalisNMostafidHVincentCGreenJSQuality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: an investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessmentsAnn Surg Oncol201118133535354321594706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar