Older People’s Attitudes And Perspectives Of Welfare Technology In Norway

References

• Eurostat. Population structure and ageing. 5 2018 Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Population_structure_and_ageing_#_The_share_of_elderly_people_continues_to_increase Accessed 327, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Norway S. Population projections. 6 26, 2018 Available from: https://www.ssb.no/en/folkfram Accessed 327, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez VG, Pfeiffer CF Legal aspects on smart house welfare technology for older people in Norway. Paper presented at: Intelligent Environments (Workshops); London, UK, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Norway S. Innbyggerne i store kommuner venter lengst på omsorgstjenester. 2017 Available from: https://www.ssb.no/helse/artikler-og-publikasjoner/innbyggerne-i-store-kommuner-venter-lengst-pa-omsorgstjenester Accessed 417, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Vike H. Politics and Bureaucracy in the Norwegian Welfare State: An Anthropological Approach. Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Norway S. Nursing and care services 2017. 2018 Available from: https://www.ssb.no/en/helse/artikler-og-publikasjoner/nursing-and-care-services-2017 Accessed 506, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• sykepleierforbund n. Stor sykepleiermangel i Norge. 2019 Available from: https://www.nsf.no/vis-artikkel/4383476/1740674/Stor-sykepleiermangel-i-Norge Accessed 417, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez VG, Taylor I, Bing-Jonsson PC. Ethics of smart house welfare technology for older adults: a systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(6):691–699. doi:10.1017/S026646231700096429151393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashidi P, Mihailidis A. A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2013;17(3):579–590.24592460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynn R. Universal design and welfare technology. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;229:335–344.27534324
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norway S. Færre institusjonsplassar i omsorgstenesta. 2019 Available from: https://www.ssb.no/helse/artikler-og-publikasjoner/faerre-institusjonsplassar-i-omsorgstenesta Accessed 417, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Fachinger U, Henke K-D. Der private Haushalt als Gesundheitsstandort. Theoretische Und Empirische Analysen Europäische Schriften Zu Staat Und Wirtschaft. 2010;31.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski N, Schönijahn L, Wahl M. Telemonitoring in home care: creating the potential for a safer life at home In: Kollak I, editor. Safe at Home with Assistive Technology. Cham: Springer; 2017:81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles JL, Allen RE, Palmer AJ, Hayman KJ, Keeling S, Kerse N. Older people and their social spaces: A study of well-being and attachment to place in Aotearoa New Zealand. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(4):664–671. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.03019110361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otnes B. Utviklingslinjer i pleie‐og omsorgstjenestene. Bærekraftig Omsorg. 2012;57–78.
   Google Scholar
• Anker-Hansen C On Making the Invisible Visible [Doctoral Thesis]. Norway: Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kollak I. Prerequisites: assistive technologies between user centered assistance and ‘Technicalization’ In: Kollak I, editor. Safe at Home with Assistive Technology. Cham: Springer; 2017:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Official Norwegian Reports NOU 2011: 11 Chapter 1, 2 and 3. Innovation in the Care Services. Norway: Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs G, van der Zijpp T, van Lieshout F, van Dulmen S. Research into person-centred healthcare technology: A plea for considering humanization dimensions In: McCormack B, Dulmen S, Eide H, Skovdahl H, Eide T, editors.Person-Centred Healthcare Research. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017:61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen C, Moe CE, Haraldstad K, Thygesen E. Caring by telecare? A hermeneutic study of experiences among older adults and their family caregivers. J Clin Nurs. 2018. doi:10.1111/jocn.14744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney DF, Purtilo RB, Webbe FM, et al. In-home monitoring of persons with dementia: ethical guidelines for technology research and development. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2007;3(3):217–226. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutbeam D. Health promotion glossary. Health Promot Int. 1998;13(4):349–364. doi:10.1093/heapro/13.4.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health TNDo. Recommendations on welfare technology solutions in the municipalities. 2019 Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/tema/velferdsteknologi/anbefalinger-om-velferdsteknologiske-losninger-i-kommunene Accessed 507, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Finkena S, Mörtbergba C. The Thinking House: configurings of an infrastructure of care. Infrastruct Healthcare. 2011:43.
   Google Scholar
• Chan M, Estève D, Escriba C, Campo E. A review of smart homes—present state and future challenges. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008;91(1):55–81. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.02.00118367286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam M, Reaz M, Ali MM, Samad SA, Hashim FH, Hamzah M Human activity classification for smart home: a multiagent approach. Paper presented at: 2010 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA) Penang, Malaysia; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bourobou S, Yoo Y. User activity recognition in smart homes using pattern clustering applied to temporal ANN algorithm. Sensors. 2015;15(5):11953–11971. doi:10.3390/s15051195326007738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatima I, Fahim M, Lee Y-K, Lee S. A unified framework for activity recognition-based behavior analysis and action prediction in smart homes. Sensors. 2013;13(2):2682–2699. doi:10.3390/s13020268223435057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brdiczka O, Langet M, Maisonnasse J, Crowley JL. Detecting human behavior models from multimodal observation in a smart home. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2009;6(4):588–597. doi:10.1109/TASE.2008.2004965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debes C, Merentitis A, Sukhanov S, Niessen M, Frangiadakis N, Bauer A. Monitoring activities of daily living in smart homes: understanding human behavior. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2016;33(2):81–94. doi:10.1109/MSP.2015.2503881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez VG, Skeie N-O Decision trees for human activity recognition in smart house environments. Paper presented at: Proceedings of The 59th Conference on Simulation and Modelling (SIMS 59); 26–28 9; 2018; Norway, Oslo Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Park K, Lin Y, Metsis V, Le Z, Makedon F Abnormal human behavioral pattern detection in assisted living environments. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments; Samos, Greece, 23–25 June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rozo C. Consideraciones éticas de la tecnología de asistencia en personas en condición de discapacidad: posibilitar o limitar la autonomía? Revista Latinoamericana De Bioética. 2010;10(18):056–065. doi:10.18359/rlbi.978
   Google Scholar
• McCormack B. Researching nursing practice: does person‐centredness matter? 1. Nurs Philoso. 2003;4(3):179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Baraas RC, Hagen LA, Pedersen HR, Gjelle JV. 15 doing eye and vision research in a person‐centred way. Person-Centred Healthcare Res. 2017;181.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett JJ. Elements of User Experience, The: User-centered Design for the Web and Beyond. Pearson Education; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483–488. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-611513933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio H, Pietila AM, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(12):2954–2965. doi:10.1111/jan.1303127221824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.00114769454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. SAGE Publications, inc; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18(2):179–183. doi:10.1002/nur.47701802117899572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall MN. Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract. 1996;13(6):522–526. doi:10.1093/fampra/13.6.5229023528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossey E, Harvey C, McDermott F, Davidson L. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002;36(6):717–732. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x12406114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie ML, Lindsay S, Brittain K. Technology and trust: older people’s perspectives of a home monitoring system. Ageing Soc. 2016;36(7):1501–1525. doi:10.1017/S0144686X15000501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lindgren B-M, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;56:29–34. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.00228651100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler EG. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. Content Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic Inquiry. 1985;289:331.
   Google Scholar
• NSD. The Norwegian Center for Research Data - Assessment of projects. Available from: https://nsd.no/personvernombud/en/help/index.html Accessed 917, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Berridge C. Breathing room in monitored space: the impact of passive monitoring technology on privacy in independent living. Gerontologist. 2016;56(5):807–816. doi:10.1093/geront/gnv03426035900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjelltun AMS, Henriksen N, Norberg A, Gilje F, Normann HK. Carers’ and nurses’ appraisals of needs of nursing home placement for frail older in Norway. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(22):3079–3088. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02663.x19374699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzner TL, Boron JB, Fausset CB, et al. Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26(6):1710–1721. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.02020967133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek ST, Luijkx KG, Rijnaard MD, et al. Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology. 2016;62(2):226–237. doi:10.1159/00043094926044243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge C, Furseth PI, Cuthbertson R, Demello S. Technology-based innovation for independent living: policy and innovation in the United Kingdom, Scandinavia, and the United States. J Aging Soc Policy. 2014;26(3):213–228. doi:10.1080/08959420.2014.89917724716894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow R, Sparrow L. In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds Mach. 2006;16(2):141–161. doi:10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisot M, Moltubakk Kempton A, Hagen L, Aanestad M. Data-work for personalized care: examining nurses’ practices in remote monitoring of chronic patients. Health Informatics J. 2019;1460458219833110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack B, van Dulmen S, Eide H, Skovdahl K, Eide T. Person-centred Healthcare Research. John Wiley & Sons; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Detweiler CA, Hindriks KV. A survey of values, technologies and contexts in pervasive healthcare. Pervasive Mob Comput. 2016;27:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar