Solo Mothers After Assisted Conception and Their Experiences with Postnatal Care

References

• Ory SJ, Devroey P, Banker M, et al. International federation of fertility societies surveillance 2013: preface and conclusions. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(6):1582–1583. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Directorate of Health. Svangerskapsomsorgen. Nasjonal faglig retningslinje [Pregnancy care. National guidelines]. 2018. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/svangerskapsomsorgen. Accessed July 31, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Graham S. Choosing single motherhood? Single women negotiating the nuclear family ideal. In: Cutas D, Chan S, editors. Families – Beyond the Nuclear Ideal. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2014:97–109.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. Births, main figures. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/statistikker/fodte. Accessed August 25, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Biotechnology Advisory Board. Evaluering av bioteknologiloven 2014–15 [evaluation of the biotechnology act 2014–15]; 2015. Available from: http://www.bioteknologiradet.no/filarkiv/2015/08/Evaluering-av-bioteknologiloven.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Präg P, Mills MC. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe: usage and regulation in the context of cross-border reproductive care. In: Kreyenfeld M, Konietzka D, editors. Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017:289–309.
   Google Scholar
• Shenfield F, de Mouzon J, Pennings G, et al. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(6):1361–1368. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok S. Families created by reproductive donation: issues and research. Child Dev Perspect. 2013;7(1):61–65. doi:10.1111/cdep.12015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva V, Badger S, Morrissette M, Golombok S. ‘Mom by choice, single by life’s circumstance … ’ findings from a large scale survey of the experiences of single mothers by choice. Hum Fertil. 2009;12(4):175–184. doi:10.3109/14647270903373867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham S. Being a ‘good’ parent: single women reflecting upon ‘selfishness’ and ‘risk’ when pursuing motherhood through sperm donation. Anthropol Med. 2018;25(3):249–264. doi:10.1080/13648470.2017.1326757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray C, Golombok S. Solo mothers and their donor insemination infants: follow-up at age 2 years. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(6):1655–1660. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben‐Daniel N, Rokach R, Filtzer L, Feldman R. When two are a family: looking backward and looking forward in a group intervention with single‐by‐choice mothers. J Fam Ther. 2007;29(3):249–266. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.2007.00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock JD. Doing the right thing? Single mothers by choice and the struggle for legitimacy. Gend Soc. 2000;14(1):62–86. doi:10.1177/089124300014001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson C. Anknytningsrepresentationer Och Upplevelser Av Social Acceptans Hos Ensamstående Kvinnor Som Planerar Eller Överväger Att Få Barn, Som Väntar Barn Eller Som Har Fått Barn Genom Assisterad Befruktning (Donatorinsemination) - En Pilotstudie [Representations of Attachment and Experiences of Social Acceptance in Single Women Planning or Considering Having a Child, Expecting a Child or Having Had a Child Through Assisted Reproduction (Donor Insemination): A Pilot Study]. Student Publication for Professional Degree. Sweden: Department of Psychology, Lund University; 2014. Available from: http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=4587833&fileOId=4587834. 2014. Accessed August 25, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ari A, Weinberg-Kurnik G. The dialectics between the personal and the interpersonal in the experiences of adoptive single mothers by choice. Sex Roles. 2007;56(11–12):823–833. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9241-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen KS, Dahl B. More than just a child – solo mothers’ maternity care experiences. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2017;12:58–63. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leap N. Woman-centred or women-centred care: does it matter? Br J Midwifery. 2009;17(1):12–16. doi:10.12968/bjom.2009.17.1.37646
   Google Scholar
• Rudman A, Waldenström U. Critical views on postpartum care expressed by new mothers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7(1):178. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian institute of Public Health. User experiences of pregnancy, birth and postnatal care. National results; 2013. Available from: https://www.fhi.no/en/publ/2013/user-experiences-of-pregnancy-birth-and-postnatal-care.-national-results/. Accessed July 31, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider Z, Whitehead D, Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Nursing and Midwifery Research: Methods and Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice. 5th ed. Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier Australia; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Waldenström U. Why do some women change their opinion about childbirth over time? Birth. 2004;31(2):102–107. doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00287.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. InterView: en introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview [Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40:795–805. doi:10.1177/1403494812465030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects; 2018. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed July 31, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Golombok S, Zadeh S, Imrie S, Smith V, Freeman T. Single mothers by choice: mother-child relationships and children’s psychological adjustment. J Fam Psychol. 2016;30(4):409–418. doi:10.1037/fam0000188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spidsberg BD. Vulnerable and strong – lesbian women encountering maternity care. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60(5):478–486. doi:10.1111/jan.2007.60.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton SE, Bielby DD. That’s our kind of constellation: lesbian mothers negotiate institutionalized understandings of gender within the family. Gend Soc. 2000;14(1):36–61. doi:10.1177/089124300014001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICM International Confederation of Midwives. International code of ethics for Midwives; 2008. Available from: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2019/01/cd2008_001-eng-code-of-ethics-for-midwives.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz R. Single by Chance, Mothers by Choice: How Women are Choosing Parenthood Without Marriage and Creating the New American Family. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ezproxy2.usn.no:2537/lib/ucsn-ebooks/detail.action?docID=430936. Accessed August 25, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Golash D, Turkulainen T. Challenges and Resources of Single Mothers by Choice in Helsinki, Finland. Student Publication for Professional Degree. Helsinki: Diaconia University of Applied Sciences; 2018. Available from: https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/145909. Accessed August 15, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Barimani M, Vikström A. Successful early postpartum support linked to management, informational, and relational continuity. Midwifery. 2015;31(8):811–817. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rørtveit K, Hansen BS, Leiknes I, Joa I, Testad I, Severinsson E. Patients’ experiences of trust in the patient-nurse relationship - a systematic review of qualitative studies. Open J Nurs. 2015;5:195–209. doi:10.4236/ojn.2015.53024
   Google Scholar
• Holte TO, Bjertnaes ØA, Stavem K. Er det sammenheng mellom sykehusstørrelse og pasienterfaringer? [Is there a correlation between hospital size and patient experiences?]. Tidsskr nor Laegeforen. 2005;125(12):1685–1688.
   Google Scholar
• Letablier MT, Wall K. Changing lone parenthood patterns: new challenges for policy and research. In: Bernardi L, Mortelmans D, editors. Lone Parenthood in the Life Course. Cham: Springer; 2018:29–55.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483–488. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar