The Applicability of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in Rehabilitation for Patients with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) – A Cohort Study

References

• Levack WM, Weatherall M, Hay-Smith EJ, Dean SG, McPherson K, Siegert RJ. Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(7):Cd009727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plewnia A, Bengel J, Korner M. Patient-centeredness and its impact on patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes in medical rehabilitation. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(12):2063–2070. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugavanam T, Mead G, Bulley C, Donaghy M, van Wijck F. The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation - a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(3):177–190. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.690501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose A, Rosewilliam S, Soundy A. Shared decision making within goal setting in rehabilitation settings: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):65–75. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellekjær H, Selmer R. Hjerneslag – like mange rammes, men prognosen er bedre. Tidsskr Nor. 2007;127:740–743.
   Google Scholar
• Akerkar R, Bakken IJ. Hjerte- Og Karregisteret. Oslo: Folkehelseinstituttet; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Grabljevec K, Singh R, Denes Z, et al. Evidence based position paper on physical and rehabilitation medicine professional practice for adults with acquired brain injury. The European PRM position (UEMS PRM Section). Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte E, Skidmore E, Aizenstein H, Ricker J, Butters M. Cognitive impairment in acquired brain injury: a predictor of rehabilitation outcomes and an opportunity for novel interventions. PM R. 2011;3(6 Suppl 1):S45–51. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.05.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagle J, Farner L, Flekkoy K, et al. Early post-stroke cognition in stroke rehabilitation patients predicts functional outcome at 13 months. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2011;31(5):379–387. doi:10.1159/000328970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Rehabilitation in Health Systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Moore JL, Potter K, Blankshain K, Kaplan SL, O’Dwyer LC, Sullivan JE. A core set of outcome measures for adults with neurologic conditions undergoing rehabilitation: a clinical practice guideline. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018;42(3):174–220. doi:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens A, Beurskens A, Koke A, van der Weijden T. The use of patient-specific measurement instruments in the process of goal-setting: a systematic review of available instruments and their feasibility. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(11):1005–1019. doi:10.1177/0269215513490178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall AM, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira ML, Costa LO. The patient-specific functional scale is more responsive than the Roland Morris disability questionnaire when activity limitation is low. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(1):79–86. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1521-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pengel LH, Refshauge KM, Maher CG. Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2004;29(8):879–883. doi:10.1097/00007632-200404150-00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiother Can. 1995;47(4):258–263. doi:10.3138/ptc.47.4.258
   Google Scholar
• Shirley Ryan Ability Lab. Rehabilitation measures database; 2013. Available from: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/database.
   Google Scholar
• Kjeken I. The BRIDGE rehabilitation trial (BRIDGE) clinical trials.gov. U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2017. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03102814?term=patient±specific±functional±scale&rank=5.
   Google Scholar
• Grotle M, Kjeken I. Patient-Specific Functional Scale, Norwegian Translation. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Moseng T, Tveter AT, Holm I. Pasient-Spesifikk Funksjons Skala - Et nyttig verktøy for fysioterapeuter i primærhelsetjenesten. Nor J Physiother. 2013;(2).
   Google Scholar
• Horn KK, Jennings S, Richardson G, Vliet DV, Hefford C, Abbott JH. The patient-specific functional scale: psychometrics, clinimetrics, and application as a clinical outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(1):30–42. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer A, Nilsagard Y, Forsberg A, Pepa H, Skargren E, Oberg B. Evaluation of therapeutic riding (Sweden)/hippotherapy (United States). A single-subject experimental design study replicated in eleven patients with multiple sclerosis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2005;21(1):51–77. doi:10.1080/09593980590911525
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cup EH, Scholte Op Reimer WJM, Thijssen MCE, van Kuyk-minis MAH. Reliability and validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(4):402–409. doi:10.1191/0269215503cr635oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SY, Lin CY, Lee YC, Chang JH. The Canadian occupational performance measure for patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(3):548–555. doi:10.1589/jpts.29.548
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barker RN, Sealey CJ, Polley ML, Mervin MC, Comans T. Impact of a person-centred community rehabilitation service on outcomes for individuals with a neurological condition. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(11):1136–1142. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1185803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean SG, Poltawski L, Forster A, et al. Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018409. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schnohr CW, Damkjær L, Bjørner JB. Oversættelse og validering af en dansk udgave af PSFS (Patient Specifik Funktionel Skala) – et nyttigt værktøj for terapeuter. Fysioterapeuten. 2016;01.
   Google Scholar
• Melville LL, Baltic TA, Bettcher TW, Nelson DL. Patients’ perspectives on the self-identified goals assessment. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56(6):650–659. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.6.650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet HC, Knol DL, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB. Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Auger C, Demers L, Swaine B. Making sense of pragmatic criteria for the selection of geriatric rehabilitation measurement tools. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2006;43(1):65–83. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2005.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evensen J, Skøien R, Sareneva E, et al. Rehabilitering. Samvalg I Målavklaringsprosessen; Kunnskapsbasert Fagprosedyre. Innlandet Hospital Trust, editor. Helsebiblioteket; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. III. Diagnosis and treatment. Scott Med J. 1957;2(6):254–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Phys Ther. 1984;64(1):35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(10):1314–1319. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1091–1096. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Baddeley A, Hiorns R. The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problems. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989;12(11(6)):855–870. doi:10.1080/01688638908400940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz N, Itzkovich M, Averbuch S, Elazar B. Loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment (LOTCA) battery for brain-injured patients: reliability and validity. Am J Occup Ther. 1989;43(3):184–192. doi:10.5014/ajot.43.3.184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddeley AD. The rivermead behavioural memory test: håndbok - voksne. Namsos. 1997;32.
   Google Scholar
• Katz N, Itzkovich M, Averbuch S. The loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(8):1179. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(02)70008-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SY, Gong ZK, Sen J, Han L, Zhang M, Chen W. The usefulness of the loewenstein occupational therapy cognition assessment in evaluating cognitive function in patients with stroke. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(23):3665–3672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu ZZ, Jiang SJ, Li J, et al. Clinical application of loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment battery-second edition in evaluating of cognitive function of Chinese patients with post-stroke aphasia. Chin Med Sci J. 2013;28(3):167–171.
   Google Scholar
• Sundet K, Finset A, Reinvang I. Neuropsychological predictors in stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1988;10(4):363–379. doi:10.1080/01688638808408245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinvang I. Aphasia and Brain Organization. New York, Boston, MA: Springer, Plenum Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Krohne K, Slettebo A, Bergland A. Cognitive screening tests as experienced by older hospitalised patients: a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011;25(4):679–687. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00878.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert D, Lindsay MP, McIntyre A, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(4):459–484. doi:10.1177/1747493016643553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Lai SM, Keighley J. Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39(5):835–841. doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(00)00003-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuntland H, Aaslund MK, Langeland E, Espehaug B, Kjeken I. Psychometric properties of the Canadian occupational performance measure in home-dwelling older adults. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:411–423. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S113727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. Clinical utility of the Canadian occupational performance measure–Swedish version. Can J Occup Ther. 2002;69(1):40–48. doi:10.1177/000841740206900104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Kuipers P, Cornwell PL. Clinical utility of the combined use of the Canadian occupational performance measure and goal attainment scaling. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64(6):904–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens A, Moser A, Koke A, van der Weijden T, Beurskens A. The patient’s perspective of the feasibility of a patient-specific instrument in physiotherapy goal setting: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:425–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berdal G, Sand-Svartrud AL, Bo I, et al. Aiming for a healthier life: a qualitative content analysis of rehabilitation goals in patients with rheumatic diseases. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(7):765–778. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1275043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Askim T, Balandin S, Armstrong E, Rise MB. Experiences of participation in goal setting for people with stroke-induced aphasia in Norway. A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(11):1122–1130. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1185167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Black SE, Duchan FJ, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. Training volunteers as conversation partners using “supported conversation for adults with aphasia” (SCA): a controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44(3):624–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack WM, Siegert RJ, Dean SG, McPherson KM. Goal planning for adults with acquired brain injury: how clinicians talk about involving family. Brain Inj. 2009;23(3):192–202. doi:10.1080/02699050802695582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinanović O. Neuropsychology of acute stroke. Psychiatr Danub. 2010;22(2):278–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters C, Kwakkel G, Eeh VW, Nijland RHM, Veerbeek JM, Meskers CGM. Moving stroke rehabilitation forward: the need to change research. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;43(1):19–30. doi:10.3233/NRE-172393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson EB, Kirschner K, Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Clorfene J, Goodman R. Brief cognitive assessment and prediction of functional outcome in stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;9(4):10–21. doi:10.1310/84YN-Y640-8UEQ-PDNV
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park SH, Sohn MK, Jee S, Yang SS. The characteristics of cognitive impairment and their effects on functional outcome after inpatient rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(5):734–742. doi:10.5535/arm.2017.41.5.734
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leknes R, Grue R, Næss T, Lillefjell M. Erfaringer med bruk av kartleggingsverktøyet LOTCA. Ergoterapeuten. 2016;59(6):36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Zwecker M, Levenkrohn S, Fleisig Y, Zeilig G, Ohry A, Adunsky A. Mini-mental state examination, cognitive FIM instrument, and the loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment: relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(3):342–345. doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.29641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolles BM, Buchbinder R, Beaton DE. A study compared nine patient-specific indices for musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(8):791–801. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott JH, Schmitt JS. The patient-specific functional scale was valid for group-level change comparisons and between-group discrimination. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(6):681–688. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar