Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Reliability of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) for Arabic Speaking Patients with Type II Diabetes

References

• Cho N, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, et al. IDF diabetes Atlas: global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;138:271–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majeed A, El-Sayed AA, Khoja T, Alshamsan R, Millett C, Rawaf S. Diabetes in the Middle-East and North Africa: an update. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103(2):218–222. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoushi S, Johnson MI, Tashani OA. Point prevalence of painful diabetic neuropathy in the Middle East and North Africa region: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Libyan J Med Sci. 2018;2(3):85.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond M. An investigation of the integration of education and mental health treatment into the care of diabetes in Syrian refugee women. Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. Paper 2181. 2015. Available from: http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2181. Accessed August 16, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• George Bakris M, Blonde MD, Andrew JM, Boulton M. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2015. Diabetes Care J Clin Appl Res Educ. 2015;38:S1–99.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead LC, Crowe MT, Carter JD, et al. A nurse‐led education and cognitive behaviour therapy‐based intervention among adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(4):821–829. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamous RM, Sweileh WM, Abu-Taha AS, Sawalha AF, Sa’ed HZ, Morisky DE. Adherence and satisfaction with oral hypoglycemic medications: a pilot study in Palestine. Int J Clin Pharm. 2011;33(6):942–948. doi:10.1007/s11096-011-9561-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Sheikh B, Arabiat DH, Holmes SL, et al. Correlates of treatment satisfaction and well‐being among patients with type II diabetes. Int Nurs Rev. 2018;65(1):114–121. doi:10.1111/inr.12358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcubierre N, Rubinat E, Traveset A, et al. A prospective cross-sectional study on quality of life and treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetic patients with retinopathy without other major late diabetic complications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debono M, Cachia E. The impact of diabetes on psychological well being and quality of life. The role of patient education. Psychol Health Med. 2007;12(5):545–555. doi:10.1080/13548500701235740.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicolucci A, Cucinotta D, Squatrito S, et al.; QuoLITy Study Group. Clinical and socio-economic correlates of quality of life and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;19(1):45–53. doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2007.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takase T, Nakamura A, Yamamoto C, et al. Improvement in treatment satisfaction after switching from liraglutide to dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(3):699–705. doi:10.1111/jdi.12906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Shahrani A, Baraja M. Patient satisfaction and it’s relation to diabetic control in a primary care setting. J Family Med Prim Care. 2014;3(1):5.
   Google Scholar
• Boels AM, Vos RC, Hermans TG, et al. What determines treatment satisfaction of type 2 diabetes patients on insulin therapy? An observational study in eight European countries. A Utopian Future? 2018;57.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett J, Adelman A, Gabbay R, Aňel-Tiangco RM. Relationship between depression and treatment satisfaction among patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Metab. 2012;3(7).
   Google Scholar
• Holmes-Truscott E, Skovlund SE, Hendrieckx C, Pouwer F, Peyrot M, Speight J. Assessing the perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: psychometric validation of the DAWN2 impact of diabetes profile in the second diabetes MILES–Australia (MILES-2) survey. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;150:253–263. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2019.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilbur K, Al Hammaq AO. Validation of an arabic version of the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire in Qatar. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;113:53–59. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2015.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley CL. The diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire: DTSQ. In: Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: A Guide to Psychological Measurement in Diabetes Research and Practice. Vol. 111. 1994:132.
   Google Scholar
• Plowright R, Witthaus E, Bradley C. Psychometric evaluation of diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire in 8 languages. Proc Br Psychol Soc. 2000;8(2):43.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley C, Plowright R, Stewart J, Valentine J, Witthaus E. The diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire change version (DTSQc) evaluated in insulin glargine trials shows greater responsiveness to improvements than the original DTSQ. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):57. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley C, Plowright R, Stewart J, Witthaus E. Diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (change) in English and German evaluated in insulin glargine trials. Diabetologia. 2000;43(1):A196.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley C, Lewis KS. Measures of psychological well‐being and treatment satisfaction developed from the responses of people with tablet‐treated diabetes. Diabet Med. 1990;7(5):445–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saatci E, Tahmiscioglu G, Bozdemir N, Akpinar E, Ozcan S, Kurdak H. The well-being and treatment satisfaction of diabetic patients in primary care. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8(1):67. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra A, Bentler P. Scaling corrections for statistics in covariance structure analysis. 1988. Available from: https://escholarship.org/content/qt3141h70c/qt3141h70c.pdf. Accessed January 13, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM, Wu EJ. EQS 6.1 for windows. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software INC; 2005. Available from: http://www.mvsoft.com/pub/EQS%2061%20QuickStart.pdf. Accessed January 13, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2002;9(2):233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon DR, Sauer PL, Young M. Composite reliability in structural equations modeling. Educ Psychol Meas. 1995;55(3):394–406. doi:10.1177/0013164495055003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Hau KT, Balla JR, Grayson D. Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behav Res. 1998;33(2):181–220. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JR. The fallacy of formative measurement. Organ Res Methods. 2011;14(2):370–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies KA, Lane AM, Devonport TJ, Scott JA. Validity and reliability of a brief emotional intelligence scale (BEIS-10). J Individ Differ. 2010. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar