Magnitude of Cesarean Section Delivery and Its Associated Factors Among Mothers Who Gave Birth at Public Hospitals in Northern Ethiopia: Institution-Based Cross-Sectional Study

References

• Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Rep. 2010;30:1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Feng XL, Wang Y, An L, et al. Cesarean section in the People’s Republic of China: current perspectives. Int J Women’s Health. 2014;6:59. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S41410
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stjernholm YV, Petersson K, Eneroth E. Changed indications for cesarean sections. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(1):p. 49–53. doi:10.3109/00016340903418777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayathry D, Guthi VR, Bele S, et al. A study of maternal morbidity associated with caesarean delivery in tertiary care hospital. Int J Commun Med Public Health. 2017;4(5):p. 1542. doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20171760
   Google Scholar
• Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):p. 98–113. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luz G, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Report. 2010;30.
   Google Scholar
• Berhan Y, Abdela A. Emergency obstetric performance with emphasis on operative delivery outcome: does it reflect the quality of care? Ethiop J Health Dev. 2004;18(2):96.
   Google Scholar
• Strom S, Rates, Trends and Determinants of Cesarean Section Deliveries in El Salvador: 1998 to 2008. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Al Rifai R. Rising cesarean deliveries among apparently low-risk mothers at university teaching hospitals in Jordan: analysis of population survey data, 2002–2012. Glob Health: Sci Pract. 2014;2(2):p. 195–209.
   Google Scholar
• ACOG. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Profile of Ob-Gyn Practice. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Laganà AS, Cromi A, Tozzi R, Franchi M, Lukanović D, Ghezzi F. Uterine scar healing after cesarean section: managing an old surgery in an evidence-based environment. J Investig Surg. 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulino FA, Pappalardo E, Ettore C, et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy: descriptive paper of three different types of management on a series of clinical cases. Przegla?d Menopauzalny= Menopause Rev. 2020;19(2):p. 61. doi:10.5114/pm.2020.97836
   Google Scholar
• Franchi M, Raffaelli R, Baggio S, et al. Unintentional transvesical caesarean section: incidence, risk factors, surgical technique and post-operative management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;236:26–31. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganà AS, Platania A, Butticè S, et al. Comment on “Impact of mode of delivery on female postpartum sexual functioning: spontaneous vaginal delivery and operative vaginal delivery vs cesarean section”. J Sex Med. 2016;13(7):p. 1142–1143. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.03.373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganà A, Burgio MA, Ciancimino L, Evaluation of recovery and quality of sexual activity in women during postpartum in relation to the different mode of delivery: a retrospective analysis. Minerva Ginecol. 2015;67(4):p. 315–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbe S, Pocket companion to obstetrics: Normal and problem pregnancies. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ijaiya M, Aboyeji P. Caesarean delivery: the trend over a ten-year period at Ilorin, Nigeria. Niger J Surg Res. 2001;3(1):p. 11–18. doi:10.4314/njsr.v3i1.12212
   Google Scholar
• Gilliam M. Cesarean delivery on request: reproductive consequences. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(5):257–260. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Menacker F, et al. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low‐risk women: application of an “intention‐to‐treat” model. Birth. 2008;35(1):p. 3–8. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00205.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, et al. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):p. 667–670. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS medicine. 2018;15(1):e1002494.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman M, Alcock G, Azad K, et al. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in private and public health facilities in underserved South Asian communities: cross-sectional analysis of data from Bangladesh, India and Nepal. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):p. e005982. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer EL. Cesarean section: medical benefits and costs. Soc Sci Med. 2011;37(10):1223–1231. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90334-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 2014;38(8):1091–1110. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EDHS. Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: CSA and ICF; 2016. Available from: http://www.ethiodemographyandhealth.org/Measure_DHS_Ethiopia2016.pdff.
   Google Scholar
• Gedefaw G, Demis A, Alemnew B, Wondmieneh A, Getie A, Waltengus F.Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf Surg. 2020;14(p):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Fesseha N, Getachew A, Hiluf M, et al. A national review of cesarean delivery in Ethiopia. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;115(1):p. 106–111. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keag Oonagh E, Norman Jane E, Sarah JS, Myers JE. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2018;15(1):p. e1002494. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begum T, Rahman A, Nababan H, et al. Indications and determinants of caesarean section delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Matlab, Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):p. e0188074. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moges A, Ademe B, Akessa G. Prevalence and outcome of caesarean section in Attat Hospital, Gurage Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia. Arch Med. 2015;7(4):p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Tesfaye T, Hailu D, Mekonnen N, Tesfaye R. Magnitude of maternal complication and associated factors among mothers undergone cesarean section at Yirgalem general hospital, SNNPR, Ethiopia. risk. 2017;100:11.
   Google Scholar
• Tsega F, Mengistie B, Dessie Y, Mengesha M. Prevalence of cesarean section in urban health facilities and associated factors in Eastern Ethiopia: hospital based cross sectional study. J Preg Child Health. 2015;2(3):p. 169–73.
   Google Scholar
• Chu K, Cortier H, Maldonado F, et al. Cesarean section rates and indications in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country study from Medecins sans Frontieres. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):p. e44484. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutema H, Shimye A. cesarean section and associated factors at mizan aman general hospital, southwest Ethiopia. J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;2(3):p. 37–41. doi:10.11648/j.jgo.20140203.12
   Google Scholar
• Adhena T, Haftu A, Gebre G, Dimtsu B. Assessment of magnitude and associated factors of adverse birth outcomes among deliveries at Suhul Hospital Shire Tigray, Ethiopia from September, 2015 to February, 2016. Res Rev. 2019;6(1):p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bayou YT, Mashalla YJ, Thupayagale-Tshweneagae G. Patterns of caesarean-section delivery in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2016;8(2):p. 1–6. doi:10.4102/phcfm.v8i2.953
   Google Scholar
• Abebe FE, Gebeyehu AW, Kidane AN, et al. Factors leading to cesarean section delivery at Felegehiwot referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective record review. Reprod Health. 2015;13(1):p. 6. doi:10.1186/s12978-015-0114-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira GO, Fernandes LG, de Oliveira NF, et al. Factors associated with cesarean delivery in public and private hospitals in a city of northeastern Brazil: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):p. 132. doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0570-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenoy H. Determinants of primary vs previous caesarean delivery in a tertiary care institution in Kerala, India. International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2019;3(5):229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Das BN, Kanakamedala S, Mummadi MK. Factors associated with utilization of antenatal care services among rural women, Telangana, India. Int J Commun Med Public Health. 2018;5(7):p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hafeez M, Yasin A, Badar N, Pasha MI, Akram N, Gulzar B. Prevalence and indications of caesarean section in a teaching hospital. JIMSA. 2014;27(1):p. 15–6.
   Google Scholar