Experiences of Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study

References

• sLiu Z, Zhang MM, Li YY, Li LX, Li YQ. Enhanced education for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a state-of-the-art review. J Dig Dis. 2017;18(2):84–91. doi:10.1111/1751-2980.12446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restellini S, Kherad O, Bessissow T, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of colon cleansing preparations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(32):5994–6002. doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i32.5994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylinen ER, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Pietilä AM. Effects of patients’ anxiety, previous pain experience and non-drug interventions on the pain experience during colonoscopy. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(13):1937–1944. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02704.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhise V, Modi V, Kalavar A, et al. Patient-reported attributions for missed colonoscopy appointments in two large healthcare systems. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61(7):1853–1861. doi:10.1007/s10620-016-4096-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Sriranjan V, Abou-Setta AM, Poluha W, Walker JR, Singh H. Anxiety associated with colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:1810–1818. doi:10.1038/s41395-018-0398-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan SA, Clements A, Austoker J. Patients’ experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context-A systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(2):137–146. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollbusch N, Mikocka-Walus AA, Andrews JM. The experience of anxiety in colonoscopy outpatients: a mixed-method study. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2014;37(2):166–175. doi:10.1097/SGA.0000000000000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Z, Richards R. Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2010;4(2):159–169. doi:10.1517/17530051003658736
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edvardsson D, Watt E, Pearce F. Patient experiences of caring and person-centredness are associated with perceived nursing care quality. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(1):217–227. doi:10.1111/jan.13105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña J. Longitudinal Qualitative Research. Analyzing Change Through Time. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;56:29–34. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishel MH. Uncertainty in illness. Orthop Nurs. 1988;22(3):206–214. doi:10.1097/00006416-200305000-00009
   Google Scholar
• Flocke SA, Stange KC, Cooper GS, et al. Patient-rated importance and receipt of information for colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(10):2168–2173. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dam L, Korfage IJ, Kuipers EJ, et al. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy? Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(10):2321–2330. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzell K, Stake Nilsson K, Jervaeus A, Hultcrantz R, Wengström Y. The importance of people’s values and preferences for colorectal cancer screening participation. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27(6):1079–1084. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckw266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonberg MA, McCarthy EP, York M, Davis RB, Marcantonio ER. Factors influencing elderly women’s mammography screening decisions: implications for counseling. BMC Geriatr. 2007;7:1–8. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-7-26
   Google Scholar
• Whelehan P, Evans A, Ozakinci G. Client and practitioner perspectives on the screening mammography experience. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017;26(3):1–12. doi:10.1111/ecc.12580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths F, Bendelow G, Green E, Palmer J. Screening for breast cancer: medicalization, visualization and the embodied experience. Health (Irvine Calif). 2010;14(6):653–668. doi:10.1177/1363459310361599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Andersen B. A stitch in time saves nine: perceptions about colorectal cancer screening after a non-cancer colonoscopy result. Qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(7):1373–1379. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toft EL, Kaae SE, Malmqvist J, Brodersen J. Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019;37(2):145–154. doi:10.1080/02813432.2019.1608040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra D, Hookey LC. Comorbid illness, bowel preparation, and logistical constraints are key reasons for outpatient colonoscopy nonattendance. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:11–15. doi:10.1155/2016/2179354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan S, Partin MR, Shah P, et al. Barriers and facilitators associated with colonoscopy completion in individuals with multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:985–994. doi:10.2147/PPA.S127862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryhlander J, Ringstrom G, Simrén M, Stotzer P-O, Jakobsson S. Undergoing repeated colonoscopies – experiences from patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019;54(12):1467–1472. doi:10.1080/00365521.2019.1698649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathioudakis AG, Salakari M, Pylkkanen L, et al. Systematic review on women’s values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services. Psychooncology. 2019;28(5):939–947. doi:10.1002/pon.5041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norfjord Van Zyl M, Akhavan S, Tillgren P, Asp M. Experiences and perceptions about undergoing mammographic screening: a qualitative study involving women from a county in Sweden. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2018;13(1):1521256. doi:10.1080/17482631.2018.1521256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon A, Graff L, Elliot L, Ilnyckyj A. Acceptance of colonoscopy requires more than test tolerance. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008;22(1):41–47. doi:10.1155/2008/107467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathers SA, McKenzie GA, Robertson EM. “It was daunting”: experience of women with a diagnosis of breast cancer attending for breast imaging. Radiography. 2013;19(2):156–163. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2012.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Bynum SA, Davis JL, Green BL, Katz RV. Unwillingness to participate in colorectal cancer screening: examining fears, attitudes, and medical mistrust in an ethnically diverse sample of adults 50 years and older. Am J Health Promot. 2012;26(5):295–300. doi:10.4278/ajhp.110113-QUAN-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa LMM, Marques-Vieira CMA, Antunes AV, Frade M de FG, Severino SPS, Valentim OS. Humor intervention in the nurse-patient interaction. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72(4):1078–1085. doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Wallace M, Mishel MH. Watching, waiting and uncertainty in prostate cancer. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(4):734–741. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01545.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halcomb EJ, Davidson PM. Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary? Appl Nurs Res. 2006;19(1):38–42. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2005.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood M, Kendrick T, Davies H, Gill FJ. Hearing voices: comparing two methods for analysis of focus group data. Appl Nurs Res. 2017;35:90–93. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2017.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konradsen H, Kirkevold M, Olson K. Recognizability: a strategy for assessing external validity and for facilitating knowledge transfer in qualitative research. Adv Nurs Sci. 2013;36(2):66–76. doi:10.1097/ANS.0b013e318290209d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai M, Nutalapati V, Bansal A, et al. Use of smartphone applications to improve quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2019;07(02):E216–E224. doi:10.1055/a-0796-6423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar