Google Glass-Supported Cooperative Training for Health Professionals: A Case Study Based on Using Remote Desktop Virtual Support

References

• Li J, Talari P, Kelly A, et al. Interprofessional Teamwork Innovation Model (ITIM) to promote communication and patient-centred, coordinated care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(9):700–709. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld E, Kinney S, Weiner C, et al. Interdisciplinary medication decision making by pharmacists in pediatric hospital settings: an ethnographic study. Social Adm Pharm. 2018;14(3):269–278. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.03.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno M, Wang X, Besancon L, Mcguffin MJ, Isenberg T. Collaborative work in augmented reality: a survey. In: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics; October 21; 2020:1.
   Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Masai K, Kunze K, Sugimoto M, Billinghurst M. A remote collaboration system with empathy glasses. 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct); September 19–23; Merida, Yucatan, Mexico; 2016:342–343.
   Google Scholar
• VIRNECT. VIRNECT. 2021. Available from: https://virnect.com/. Accessed March 6, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Faiola A, Belkacem I, Bergey D, Pecci I, Martin B. Towards the design of a smart glasses application for micu decision-support: assessing the human factors impact of data portability & accessibility. Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Healthc. 2019;8(1):52–56. doi:10.1177/2327857919081012
   Google Scholar
• Wrzesińska N. The use of smart glasses in healthcare–review. MEDtube Sci. 2015;31.
   Google Scholar
• Basoglu NA, Goken M, Dabic M, Ozdemir Gungor D, Daim TU. Exploring adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: applications in the medical industry. Front Eng Manag. 2018;5(2):167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei NJ, Dougherty B, Myers A, Badawy SM. Using google glass in surgical settings: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(3):e54. doi:10.2196/mhealth.9409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman R, Wood ME, Qian L, Price CL, Johnson AA, Osgood GM. Head-mounted display use in surgery: a systematic review. Surg Innov. 2020;27(1):88–100. doi:10.1177/1553350619871787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrasinovic S, Camacho E, Trivedi N, et al. Clinical and surgical applications of smart glasses. Technol Health Care. 2015;23(4):381–401. doi:10.3233/THC-150910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruminski J, Smiatacz M, Bujnowski A, Andrushevich A, Biallas M, Kistler R. Interactions with recognized patients using smart glasses. In: 2015 8th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI). IEEE; 2015:187–194.
   Google Scholar
• Ruminski J, Bujnowski A, Kocejko T, Andrushevich A, Biallas M, Kistler R. The data exchange between smart glasses and healthcare information systems using the HL7 FHIR standard. In: 2016 9th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI); IEEE; 2016:525–531.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan F, Gerckens U. Virtual support for remote proctoring in TAVR during COVID-19. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021. doi:10.1002/ccd.29504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar NM, Singh NK, Peddiny VK. Wearable smart glass: features, applications, current progress and challenges. In: 2018 Second International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT); August 16–18; Bangalore, India. 577–582.
   Google Scholar
• Romare C, Hass U, Skär L. Healthcare professionals’ views of smart glasses in intensive care: a qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2018;45:66–71. doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2017.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiranaka T, Nakanishi Y, Fujishiro T, et al. The use of smart glasses for surgical video streaming. Surg Innov. 2017;24(2):151–154. doi:10.1177/1553350616685431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boillat T, Peter G, Homero R. Increasing completion rate and benefits of checklists: prospective evaluation of surgical safety checklists with smart glasses. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(4):e13447. doi:10.2196/13447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce BA, Menendez ME, Oladeji LO, Fryberger CT, Dantuluri PK. Emerging technology in surgical education: combining real-time augmented reality and wearable computing devices. Orthopedics. 2014;37(11):751–757. doi:10.3928/01477447-20141023-05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto DA, Phitayakorn R, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Meireles O. Blinded assessment of video quality in wearable technology for telementoring in open surgery: the google glass experience. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):372–378. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4178-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta N, MacQueen IT, Schroeder AD, et al. Wearable technology for global surgical teleproctoring. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(6):1290–1295. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan CL, Lo WC, Pai YT, Hsu CH. A survey on 360° video streaming: acquisition, transmission, and display. ACM Comput. 2019;52(4):1–36. doi:10.1145/3329119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaqoob A, Bi T, Muntean. G-M. A survey on adaptive 360° video streaming: solutions, challenges and opportunities. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor. 2020;22(4):2801–2838. doi:10.1109/COMST.2020.3006999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayol-Cuevas WW, Tordoff BJ, Murray DW. On the choice and placement of wearable vision sensors. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern a Syst Hum. 2009;39(2):414–425. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2008.2010848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann B, Haustein D, Landeweerd L. Smart-glasses: exposing and elucidating the ethical issues. Sci Eng Ethics. 2017;23(3):701–721. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9792-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimmer C, Mateescu M, Zahn C, Genewein U. Smartphones as multimodal communication devices to facilitate clinical knowledge processes: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e263. doi:10.2196/jmir.2758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresciani S, Arora P, Kernbach S. Education and culture affect visualization’s effectiveness for health communication. In: 2018 22nd International Conference Information Visualisation (IV); July 10–13; Fisciano, Italy; 2018:386–389.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong J, Kim TH, Kang SB. A feasibility study of audio-video communication application using mobile telecommunication in inter-hospital transfer situations. Korean J Emerg Med Ser. 2019;23(1):125–134.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad N, Fernando S, Willey S, et al. Online interprofessional simulation for undergraduate health professional students during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Interprof Care. 2020;34(5):706–710. doi:10.1080/13561820.2020.1811213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlomann A, Seifert A, Zank S, Woopen C, Rietz C. Use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) devices among the oldest-old: loneliness, anomie, and autonomy. Innov Aging. 2020;4(2):igz050. doi:10.1093/geroni/igz050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopik WJ, Rikard RV, Cotten SR. Individual difference predictors of ICT use in older adulthood: a study of 17 candidate characteristics. Comput Human Behav. 2017;76:526–533. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akshay A, Venkatesh MP, Kumar P. Wearable healthcare technology-the regulatory perspective. Int J Drug Regul Aff. 2017;4(1):1–5. doi:10.22270/ijdra.v4i1.13
   Google Scholar
• Erdmier C, Hatcher J, Lee M. Wearable device implications in the healthcare industry. J Med Eng Technol. 2016;40(4):141–148. doi:10.3109/03091902.2016.1153738
   PubMedGoogle Scholar