From “Cure” to “Care”: The Role of the MultiDisciplinary Team on Colorectal Cancer Patients’ Satisfaction and Oncological Outcomes

References

• Multidisciplinary Team [Internet]; [ cited June 6, 2021]. Available from: https://datadictionary.nhs.uk/nhs_business_definitions/multidisciplinary_team.html. Accessed June 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, Hunter A. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43(6):1002–1010. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2007.01.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesslie M, Parikh J. Implementing a multidisciplinary tumor board in the community practice setting. Diagnostics. 2017;7(4):55. doi:10.3390/diagnostics7040055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennell ML, Das IP, Clauser S, Petrelli N, Salner A. The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):72–80. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Overview | lung cancer: diagnosis and management | guidance. NICE; [ cited June 6, 2021]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng122. Accessed June 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Nordlinger B, Arnold D, The ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:iii1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C, et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:v56–68. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argilés G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, et al. Localised colon cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(10):1291–1305. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempero MA. NCCN guidelines updates: pancreatic cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2019;17(5.5):603–605. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.5007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercantini P, Lucarini A, Mazzuca F, Osti MF, Laghi A. How technology can help in oncologic patient management during COVID-19 outbreak. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(6):1189–1191. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer RD, Prime MS. A clinician’s perspective on co-developing and co-implementing a digital tumor board solution. Health Informatics J. 2020;26(3):2213–2221. doi:10.1177/1460458219899841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen A, Robinson T, Brunner M, Harnett P, Museth KE, Shaw T. Multidisciplinary teams and ICT: a qualitative study exploring the use of technology and its impact on multidisciplinary team meetings. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3242-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coory M, Gkolia P, Yang IA, Bowman RV, Fong KM. Systematic review of multidisciplinary teams in the management of lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2008;60(1):14–21. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.01.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basta YL, Baur OL, van Dieren S, Klinkenbijl JHG, Fockens P, Tytgat KMAJ. Is there a benefit of multidisciplinary cancer team meetings for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(8):2430–2437. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, Vincent C, Green JSA, Sevdalis N. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(8):2116–2125. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prades J, Remue E, van Hoof E, Borras J. Is it worth reorganising cancer services on the basis of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs)? A systematic review of the objectives and organisation of MDTs and their impact on patient outcomes. Health Policy (New York). 2015;119(4):464–474. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay B, Wootten AC, Crowe H, et al. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;42:56–72. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wille-Jørgensen P, Sparre P, Glenthøj A, et al. Result of the implementation of multidisciplinary teams in rectal cancer. Color Dis. 2013;15(4):410–413. doi:10.1111/codi.12013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDermid E, Hooton G, Macdonald M, et al. Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Color Dis. 2009;11(3):291–295. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01580.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer G, Martling A, Cedermark B, Holm T. Preoperative tumour staging with multidisciplinary team assessment improves the outcome in locally advanced primary rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(12):1361–1369. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02460.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak VN, Khorana AA, Amarnath S, Glass KE, Kalady MF. Multidisciplinary clinics for colorectal cancer care reduces treatment time. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017;16(4):366–371. doi:10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specchia ML, Frisicale EM, Carini E, et al. The impact of tumor board on cancer care: evidence from an umbrella review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1). doi:10.1186/s12913-020-4930-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. - PsycNET. PsycNET [Internet]; 1932 [ cited June 6, 2021]. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1933-01885-001. Accessed June 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, et al. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 2002;6(32) doi:10.3310/hta6320
   Google Scholar
• Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras J, Albreht T, Audisio R, et al. Policy statement on multidisciplinary cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(3):475–480. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atun R, Ogawa T, Martin-Moreno JM. Analysis of National Cancer Control Programmes in Europe; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lamprell K, Arnolda G, Delaney GP, Liauw W, Braithwaite J. The challenge of putting principles into practice: resource tensions and real-world constraints in multidisciplinary oncology team meetings. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019;15(4):199–207. doi:10.1111/ajco.13166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrios C, Sánchez-Vanegas G, Villarreal-Garza C, et al. Barriers and facilitators to provide multidisciplinary care for breast cancer patients in five Latin American countries: a descriptive-interpretative qualitative study. Lancet Reg Health. 2022;11:100254.
   Google Scholar
• Kočo L, Weekenstroo HHA, Lambregts DMJ, et al. The effects of multidisciplinary team meetings on clinical practice for colorectal, lung, prostate and breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancers. 2021;13(16):4159. doi:10.3390/cancers13164159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huilgol YS, Adler‐Milstein J, Ivey SL, Hong JC. Opportunities to use electronic health record audit logs to improve cancer care. Cancer Med. 2022. doi:10.1002/cam4.4690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colorectal cancer survival rates | Colorectal Cancer Prognosis [Internet]. [ cited July 19, 2021]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/colon-rectal-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html. Accessed June 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb B, Sevdalis N, Mostafid H, Vincent C, Green J. Quality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: an investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessments. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(13):3535–3543. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1773-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb B, Taylor C, Lamb J, et al. Facilitators and barriers to teamworking and patient centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer teams: findings of a national study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1408–1416. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2676-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb B, Sevdalis N, Arora S, Pinto A, Vincent C, Green J. Teamwork and team decision-making at multidisciplinary cancer conferences: barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for improvement. World J Surg. 2011;35(9):1970–1976. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1152-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas T, Althouse A, Sigler L, et al. Stronger therapeutic alliance is associated with better quality of life among patients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology. 2021;30(7):1086–1094. doi:10.1002/pon.5648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuertes J, Toporovsky A, Reyes M, Osborne J. The physician-patient working alliance: theory, research, and future possibilities. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(4):610–615. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piedmont RL. Acquiescence response set. 2014 [ cited June 6, 2021]: 11. Available from: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_12. Accessed June 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Morris EJA, Goldacre R, Spata E, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the detection and management of colorectal cancer in England: a population-based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(3):199–208. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00005-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempf E, Priou S, Lamé G, et al. Impact of two waves of Sars-Cov2 outbreak on the number, clinical presentation, care trajectories and survival of patients newly referred for a colorectal cancer: a French multicentric cohort study from a large group of university hospitals. Int J Cancer. 2022;150(10):1609–1618. doi:10.1002/ijc.33928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar