Realities of Using Drones to Transport Laboratory Samples: Insights from Attended Routes in a Mixed-Methods Study

References

• Ćwiklicki M, Duplaga M, Klich J. The digital transformation of healthcare: health 4. 0. Milton: Taylor & Francis Group; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Greaves RF, Bernardini S, Ferrari M, et al. Key questions about the future of laboratory medicine in the next decade of the 21st century: a report from the IFCC-Emerging technologies division. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;495:570–589. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2019.05.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arezzo A, Gagliardi G. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: is robotics the way to go? Tech Coloproctol. 2021;25(11):1179–1182. doi:10.1007/s10151-021-02514-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsouras D, Liacouras PC, Wake N, Rybicki FJ. RadioGraphics update: medical 3D printing for the radiologist. Radiographics. 2020;40(4):E21–E23. doi:10.1148/rg.2020190217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar RP, Pelanis E, Bugge R, et al. Use of mixed reality for surgery planning: assessment and development workflow. J Biomed Inform. 2020;112S:100077. doi:10.1016/j.yjbinx.2020.100077
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Otto A, Agatz N, Campbell J, Golden B, Pesch E. Optimization approaches for civil applications of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or aerial drones: a survey. Networks. 2018;72(4):411–458. doi:10.1002/net.21818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanfridsson J, Sparrevik J, Hollenberg J, et al. Drone delivery of an automated external defibrillator - A mixed method simulation study of bystander experience. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019;27(1):40. doi:10.1186/s13049-019-0622-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulfovich S, Rivas H, Matabuena P. Drones in Healthcare. In: Digital Health. Springer; 2018:159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Scalea JR, Restaino S, Scassero M, Blankenship G, Bartlett ST, Wereley N. An Initial Investigation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and real-time organ status measurement for transporting human organs. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2018;6:4000107. doi:10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2875704
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johannessen K-A, Comtet H, Fosse E. A drone logistic model for transporting the complete analytic volume of a large-scale university laboratory. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4580. doi:10.3390/ijerph18094580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Services MoHaC. National health and hospital plan 2020–2023. The Norwegian Government; 2019. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/meld.-st.-7-20192020/id2678667/. Accessed June 29, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman E, Koziol M. The blood is here: zipline’s medical delivery drones are changing the game in Rwanda. IEEE Spectr. 2019;56(5):24–31. doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2019.8701196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateen FJ, Leung KHB, Vogel AC, Cisse AF, Chan TCY. A drone delivery network for antiepileptic drugs: a framework and modelling case study in a low-income country. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2020;114(4):308–314. doi:10.1093/trstmh/trz131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannessen KA. A conceptual approach to time savings and cost competitiveness assessments for drone transport of biologic samples with unmanned aerial systems (Drones). Drones. 2022;6(3):62. doi:10.3390/drones6030062
   Google Scholar
• Nentwich M, Hórvath DM Delivery drones from a technology assessment perspective. Overview report; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreras LE. iTRANS: proactive ITS based on drone technology to solve urban transportation challenge. In: Meyer G, Shaheen S, editors. Disrupting Mobility. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017:323–333.
   Google Scholar
• Mion FU Flying drones to exchange lab samples service innovation by the Swiss multisite hospital EOC. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor J, Coates E, Wessels B, Mountain G, Hawley MS. Implementing solutions to improve and expand telehealth adoption: participatory action research in four community healthcare settings. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):529. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1195-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruyne S, Speeckaert MM, Van Biesen W, Delanghe JR. Recent evolutions of machine learning applications in clinical laboratory medicine. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2021;58(2):131–152. doi:10.1080/10408363.2020.1828811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichleay M, Evens E, Stankevitz K, Parker C. Using the unmanned aerial vehicle delivery decision tool to consider transporting medical supplies via drone. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019;7(4):500–506. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbero S, Pallaro A. Systemic design for sustainable healthcare. Design J. 2017;20(sup1):S2473–S2485. doi:10.1080/14606925.2017.1352762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awad A, Trenfield SJ, Pollard TD, et al. Connected healthcare: improving patient care using digital health technologies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;178:113958. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.113958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongomin O, Yemane A, Kembabazi B, et al. Industry 4.0 disruption and its neologisms in major industrial sectors: a state of the art. J Eng. 2020;2020:1–45. doi:10.1155/2020/8090521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Authority S-ENRH. Regional utviklingsplan 2035 [Regional development plan 2035 - New ways of working and better use of technology]. South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority; 2021.https://helse-sorost.no/regional-utviklingsplan-2035#nye-arbeidsformer-og-bedre-bruk-av-teknologi. Accessed March 3, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• J-P V, Bauknecht D, Kemp R. Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Geels FW. Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the multi-level perspective. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2018;37:224–231. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW, McMeekin A, Mylan J, Southerton D. A critical appraisal of sustainable consumption and production research: the reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions. Glob Environ Change. 2015;34:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int J Med Inform. 1999;55(2):87–101. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(99)00011-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW. Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the multi-level perspective. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2019;39:187–201. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach D, Schwanen T, Doody BJ, Arnfalk P, Langeland O, Farstad E. Transition governance for just, sustainable urban mobility: an experimental approach from Rotterdam, the Netherlands. J Urban Mobil. 2021;1:100009. doi:10.1016/j.urbmob.2021.100009
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh L. How useful is the multi-level perspective for transport and sustainability research? J Transp Geogr. 2012;24:483–487. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW. Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-Evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Geels FW. Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: a multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850–1930). Technol Soc. 2006;28(4):445–476. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.09.006
   Google Scholar
• Leväsluoto J, Määttä H, Hyytinen K. Challenges of customer oriented health care service models: perspectives from the renewal of a primary health care and in; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Geels FW. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res Policy. 2004;33(6):897–920. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW, Kemp R. Dynamics in socio-technical systems: typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technol Soc. 2007;29(4):441–455. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.08.009
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach D, Frantzeskaki N, Avelino F. Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2017;42(1):599–626. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1989;11(3):255–274. doi:10.3102/01623737011003255
   Google Scholar
• Andrew S, Halcomb EJ. Mixed Methods Research for Nursing and the Health Sciences. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell G. dividual and Group Interviewing. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G, editors. Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dey I. Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. London: Routledge; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ling G, Draghic N. Aerial drones for blood delivery. Transfusion. 2019;59(S2):1608–1611. doi:10.1111/trf.15195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang J, Lee JS, Kim H. Perceived innovativeness of drone food delivery services and its impacts on attitude and behavioral intentions: the moderating role of gender and age. Int J Hosp Manag. 2019;81:94–103. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Kim S, Suh K. A Comparative analysis of the environmental benefits of drone-based delivery services in urban and rural areas. Sustainability. 2018;10(3):5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rejeb A, Rejeb K, Simske SJ, Treiblmaier H. Drones for supply chain management and logistics: a review and research agenda. Int J Logist Res Appl. 2021;1–24. doi:10.1080/13675567.2021.1981273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Akaka MA, Wieland H. Rethinking the process of diffusion in innovation: a service-ecosystems and institutional perspective. J Bus Res. 2020;116:526–534. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan LKL, Lim BC, Park G, Low KH, Yeo VCS. Public acceptance of drone applications in a highly urbanized environment. Technol Soc. 2021;64:101462. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson AM, Cunningham CJ, Arnold E, Rosamond WD, Zegre-Hemsey JK. Impact of using drones in emergency medicine: what does the future hold? Open Access Emerg Med. 2021;13:487–498. doi:10.2147/OAEM.S247020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komasová S. Possible inspiration: drone-related literature and its potential for public perception research. J Intell Robot Syst. 2021;103(3). doi:10.1007/s10846-021-01498-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A, Dickinson JE, Marsden G, Cherrett T, Oakey A, Grote M. Public acceptance of the use of drones for logistics: the state of play and moving towards more informed debate. Technol Soc. 2022;68:101883. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comtet HE, Johannessen KA. The moderating role of pro-innovative leadership and gender as an enabler for future drone transports in healthcare systems. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2637. doi:10.3390/ijerph18052637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comtet HE, Johannessen KA. A socio-analytical approach to the integration of drones into health care systems. Information. 2022;13(2):62. doi:10.3390/info13020062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW, Schot J. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy. 2007;36(3):399–417. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar