240
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

MRI Evaluation of Mullerian Duct Anomalies: Practical Classification by the New ASRM System

, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 2579-2589 | Received 28 Aug 2022, Accepted 25 Oct 2022, Published online: 09 Nov 2022

References

  • Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):761–771. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr028
  • Marcal L, Nothaft MA, Coelho F, Volpato R, Iyer R. Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36(6):756–764. doi:10.1007/s00261-010-9681-x
  • Adhesions AD. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(6):944–955. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59942-7
  • Buttram VC Jr., Gibbons WE. Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril. 1979;32(1):40–46. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)44114-2
  • Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032–2044. doi:10.1093/humrep/det098
  • Ludwin A, Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(3):569–580. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu344
  • Pfeifer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein J, et al. ASRM müllerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(5):1238–1252. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.025
  • Robbins JB, Broadwell C, Chow LC, Parry JP, Sadowski EA. Müllerian duct anomalies: embryological development, classification, and MRI assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(1):1–12. doi:10.1002/jmri.24771
  • Pfeifer S, Butts S, Dumesic D. Uterine septum: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):530–540. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.014
  • Olpin JD, Moeni A, Willmore RJ, Heilbrun ME. MR imaging of Müllerian fusion anomalies. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2017;25(3):563–575. doi:10.1016/j.mric.2017.03.008
  • Al-Najar MS, Saleem MM, Alassaf AA, et al. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia and ohvira syndrome: first report of unique combination in a child. AACE Clin Case Rep. 2015;1(2):e136–40. doi:10.4158/EP14524.CR
  • Deutch TD, Abuhamad AZ. The role of 3-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of müllerian duct anomalies: a review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(3):413–423. doi:10.7863/jum.2008.27.3.413
  • Church DG, Vancil JM, Vasanawala SS. Magnetic resonance imaging for uterine and vaginal anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21(5):379–389. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283307c3e
  • Mueller GC, Hussain HK, Smith YR, et al. Müllerian duct anomalies: comparison of MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(6):1294–1302. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2494
  • Grimbizis GF, Campo MDR. Congenital malformations of the female genital tract: the need for a new classification system. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):401–407. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.030
  • Sardo DS, Campo AR, Gordts S, et al. The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies: a systematic review of cases not classified by the AFS system. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(5):1046–1058. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev061
  • Grimbizis GF, Campo R. Clinical approach for the classification of congenital uterine malformations. Gynecol Surg. 2012;9(2):119–129. doi:10.1007/s10397-011-0724-2
  • Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology. 2004;233(1):19–34. doi:10.1148/radiol.2331020777
  • Troiano RN. Magnetic resonance imaging of mullerian duct anomalies of the uterus. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;14(4):269–279. doi:10.1097/00002142-200308000-00002
  • Heinonen PK. Unicornuate uterus and rudimentary horn. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(2):224–230. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81506-3
  • Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN, Secaf E, Laros RK Jr., Hill EC. Müllerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology. 1990;176(3):715–720. doi:10.1148/radiology.176.3.2202012
  • Acién P. Incidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(7):1372–1376. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019588
  • Wang Y, Lu J, Zhu L, et al. Evaluation of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome with magnetic resonance imaging: three patterns of uterine remnants and related anatomical features and clinical settings. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(12):5215–5224. doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4919-4
  • Pan HX, Luo GN. Phenotypic and clinical aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome in a Chinese population: an analysis of 594 patients. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(5):1190–1194. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.007
  • Oppelt PG, Lermann J, Strick R, et al. Malformations in a cohort of 284 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10(1):57. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-10-57
  • Saxena AK, Elizabeth Paton RA. Vaginal Atresia; 2021. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/954110-overview. Accessed October 27, 2022.
  • Angotti R, Molinaro F, Bulotta AL, et al. Isolated vaginal agenesis associated with multiple gastrointestinal anomalies: a case report. J Neonatal Surg. 2016;5(3):32. doi:10.21699/jns.v5i3.326
  • Rathod S, Dash B, Mahapatra PC, Nayak AK. Vaginal atresia in a case of Fraser syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(Suppl 1):95–99. doi:10.1007/s13224-012-0331-9
  • Allen JW, Cardall S, Kittijarukhajorn M, Siegel CL. Incidence of ovarian maldescent in women with mullerian duct anomalies: evaluation by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(4):W381–385. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6595
  • Preibsch H, Rall K, Wietek BM, et al. Clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: diagnosis of associated malformations, uterine rudiments and intrauterine endometrium. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(7):1621–1627. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3156-3
  • Wang Y, Lu J, Zhu L, et al. Increased incidence of abnormally located ovary in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a retrospective analysis with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Radiol. 2018;43(11):3142–3146. doi:10.1007/s00261-018-1575-3
  • Fedele L, Bianchi S, Di Nola G, Franchi D, Candiani GB. Endometriosis and nonobstructive müllerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(4):515–517.
  • Uğur M, Turan C, Mungan T, et al. Endometriosis in association with müllerian anomalies. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995;40(4):261–264. doi:10.1159/000292349
  • Nawroth F, Rahimi G, Nawroth C, Foth D, Ludwig M, Schmidt T. Is there an association between septate uterus and endometriosis? Hum Reprod. 2006;21(2):542–544. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei344
  • Hall-Craggs MA, Kirkham A, Creighton SM. Renal and urological abnormalities occurring with Mullerian anomalies. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(1):27–32. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.11.003
  • Goryaeva M, Sykes MC, Lau B, West S. Unusual association between cardiac, skeletal, urogenital and renal abnormalities. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016:32.
  • Kumar S, Sharma S. MURCS (Müllerian duct aplasia-renal agenesis-cervicothoracic somite dysplasia): a rare cause of primary amenorrhoea. Oxf Med Case Rep. 2016;2016(4):73–75. doi:10.1093/omcr/omw022