344
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

A Standardized Physical Examination Method for Joints to Determine Rheumatoid Arthritis Activity Using the Modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1287-1299 | Received 11 Nov 2022, Accepted 25 Jan 2023, Published online: 08 May 2023

References

  • Gibofsky A. Overview of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18(13 Suppl):S295–302.
  • Gabriel SE. The epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2001;27(2):269–281. doi:10.1016/S0889-857X(05)70201-5
  • Turesson C, O’Fallon WM, Crowson CS, Gabriel SE, Matteson EL. Extra-articular disease manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis: incidence trends and risk factors over 46 years. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62(8):722–727. doi:10.1136/ard.62.8.722
  • Farheen K, Agarwal SK. Assessment of disease activity and treatment outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. J Manag Care Pharm. 2011;17(9Suppl B):9–13.
  • Sokka T, Pincus T. Quantitative joint assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(Suppl 39):S58–S62.
  • Smolen JS, Eberl G, Breedveld FC, et al. Validity and reliability of the twenty‐eight‐joint count for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(1):38–43. doi:10.1002/art.1780380106
  • Ringold S, Singer N. Measures of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a clinician’s guide. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2008;4:259–265. doi:10.2174/157339708786263951
  • Balsa A, Villaverde V. Índices de actividad y mejoría en la artritis reumatoide. Rev Esp Reumatol. 2002;1(1):4–8.
  • Scott IC, Scott DL. Joint counts in inflammatory arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(4):S7–12.
  • Sokka T, Pincus T. Joint counts to assess rheumatoid arthritis for clinical research and usual clinical care: advantages and limitations. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009;35(4):713–722. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2009.10.004
  • Medina YF, Ruíz-Gaviria RE, Buitrago-Lopez A, Villota C. Physical articular examination in the activity of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37(6):1457–1464. doi:10.1007/s10067-018-4015-4
  • Cheung PP, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Gossec L, et al. Reliability of patient self-evaluation of swollen and tender joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison study with ultrasonography, physician, and nurse assessments. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(8):1112–1119. doi:10.1002/acr.20178
  • Walsh CAE, Mullan RH, Minnock PB, Slattery C, FitzGerald O, Bresnihan B. Consistency in assessing the disease activity score-28 in routine clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(1):135–136. doi:10.1136/ard.2007.076885
  • Şenocak Ö̈, Ünsal E, Akalin E, Ergör G. Interobserver reliability of articular examination in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Turk J Pediatr. 2003;45(1):29–32.
  • Grunke M, Antoni CE, Kavanaugh A, et al. Standardization of joint examination technique leads to a significant decrease in variability among different examiners. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(4):860–864. doi:10.3899/jrheum.090195
  • Cheung PP, Dougados M, Andre V, et al. Improving agreement in assessment of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Jt Bone Spine. 2013;80(2):155–159. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.07.014
  • Stamp L, Harrison A, Frampton C, Corkill M, Frampton C, Michael M. Does a joint count calibration exercise make a difference? Implications for clinical trials and training. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(4):877–878. doi:10.3899/jrheum.111224
  • Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2001.
  • Cheung PP, Dougados M, Andre V, et al. The learning curve of nurses for the assessment of swollen and tender joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81(2):154–159. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.06.006
  • Kane D, Balint PV, Sturrock RD. Ultrasonography is superior to clinical examination in the detection and localization of knee joint effusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(5):966–971.
  • Kim HA, Kim SH, Seo Y. Ultrasonographic findings of the shoulder in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and comparison with physical examination. J Korean Med Sci. 2007;22(4):660–666. doi:10.3346/jkms.2007.22.4.660
  • Naredo E, Bonilla G, Gamero F, Uson J, Carmona L, Laffon A. Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(3):375–381. doi:10.1136/ard.2004.023929
  • Stone MA, White LM, Gladman DD, et al. Significance of clinical evaluation of the metacarpophalangeal joint in relation to synovial/bone pathology in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis detected by magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(12):2751–2757. doi:10.3899/jrheum.080205
  • Medina-Velásquez YF, Narváez MI, Atuesta J, et al. Variation in the definition of joint examination for the clinimetry of rheumatoid arthritis: results of a survey of a group of Colombian rheumatologists. Rev Colomb Reumatol. 2020;27(3):149–154.
  • Van Riel PLCM, Van Gestel AM, Scott DL. Eular Handbook of Clinical Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis. 3rd ed. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Van Zuiden Communications B.V.; 2004. Available from: www.vanzuidencommunications.nl. Accessed April 27, 2023.
  • No JOB, By S, Client S, et al. DAS28 quick reference guide for healthcare professionals. Berkshire, England. Report No.: RCUKCOMM00066; 2011. Available from: www.nras.org.uk/DAS. Accessed April 27, 2023.
  • Cajas LJ, Casallas A, Medina YF, Quintana G, Rondón F. Pannus and rheumatoid arthritis: historic and pathophysiological evolution. Rev Colomb Reumatol. 2019;26(2):118–128.
  • Scott DL, Houssien DA. Joint assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1996;35(SUPPL. 2):14–18. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_2.14
  • Scott DL, Antoni C, Choy EH, van Riel PCLM. Joint counts in routine practice. Rheumatology. 2003;42(8):919–923. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keg235
  • Tarner IH, Härle P, Müller-Ladner U, Gay RE, Gay S. The different stages of synovitis: acute vs chronic, early vs late and non-erosive vs erosive. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19(1):19–35. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2004.08.002
  • Ouboussad L, Burska AN, Melville A, Buch MH. Synovial tissue heterogeneity in rheumatoid arthritis and changes with biologic and targeted synthetic therapies to inform stratified therapy. Front Med. 2019;6:1–10. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00045
  • Vega-Morales D, Esquivel-Valerio JA, Garza-Elizondo MA. Do rheumatologists know how to squeeze? Evaluations of Gaenslen´s maneuver. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35(12):2037–2040. doi:10.1007/s00296-015-3354-6
  • De Jong PH, Weel AE, De Man YA, et al. To squeeze or not to squeeze, that is the question! Optimizing the disease activity score in 28 joints by adding the squeeze test of metatarsophalangeal joints in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(10):3095–3101. doi:10.1002/art.34568
  • Wiesinger T, Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Stamm T. Compression test (Gaenslen’s squeeze test) positivity, joint tenderness, and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65(4):653–657. doi:10.1002/acr.21863
  • Santosa D, Hidayat R, Prasetyo M, Nugroho P. Diagnostic values of DAS28 and DAS28-squeeze in evaluating rheumatoid arthritis disease. Indones J Rheumatol. 2018;8(2):10–14. doi:10.37275/ijr.v8i2.54