A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Articles on Midwifery Based on the Web of Science

References

• He JJ, Luo BR. Analysis of current situation and development trend of midwifery specialty research in China based on knowledge map. Chin Nurs Res. 2018;32(02):202–207. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Borrelli SE. What is a good midwife? Insights from the literature. Midwifery. 2014;30(1):3–10. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penny RA, Bradford NK, Langbecker D. Registered nurse and midwife experiences of using videoconferencing in practice: a systematic review of qualitative studies. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(5–6):e739–e752. doi:10.1111/jocn.14175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou SS, Bai H, Gu XL, et al. Investigation and study on the present situation of midwifery and the application of suitable midwifery technology in Henan Province. Chin J Nurs. 2018;53(2):158–161. doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.02.006
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook 2020. Beijing: China Statistical Press; 2020. Available from. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2020/indexeh.htm. Accessed February 28, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• National Health Commission. Notice on issuance of guidance for the reform and development of nursing services (National Health and Medical Development [2018] No.20); 2018. Available from: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/201807/1a71c7bea4a04d5f82d1aea262ab465e.shtml. Accessed February 23, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Toosi M, Modarres M, Amini M, et al. A survey of midwifery graduates’ opinions about midwifery education in Iran: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):340. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02764-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber J, Dolce MC, Hartnett E, et al. Integrating Oral Health Curricula into Midwifery Graduate Programs: results of a US Survey. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019;64(4):462–471. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond A, Gray J, Smith R, et al. Same…same but different: expectations of graduates from two midwifery education courses in Australia. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(15–16):2315–2324. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03774.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins AM, Denney-Wilson E, Homer CSE. The mentoring experiences of new graduate midwifery working in midwifery continuity of care models in Australia. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;24:106–111. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2016.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhani A, Jan R, Baig M, et al. Experiences of the graduates of the first baccalaureate midwifery programme in Pakistan: a descriptive exploratory study. Midwifery. 2018;59:94–99. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013;13(6):e29. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2013.04.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellenbecker CH, Edward J. Conducting nursing research to advance and inform health policy. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2016;17(4):208–217. doi:10.1177/1527154417700634
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He JJ, Luo BR. Analysis of research situation in the field of international midwifery based on Web of Science. J Nurs Training. 2021;36(12):1062–1068. doi:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2021.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Qu Y, Zhang C, Hu Z, et al. The 100 most influential publications in asthma from 1960 to 2017: a bibliometric analysis. Respir Med. 2018;137:206–212. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2018.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuocolo R, Ponsiglione A, Dell’Aversana S, et al. The cardiac conundrum: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of authorship in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies. Insights Imaging. 2020;11(1):42. doi:10.1186/s13244-020-00850-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Shi X, Zhang N, et al. Bibliometric analysis of trends and issues in traditional medicine for stroke research: 2004–2018. BMC Complement Ther. 2020;20(1):39. doi:10.1186/s12906-020-2832-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zavaleta-Lopez E, Villarreal-Zegarra D, Cjuno J, et al., Scientific production of midwifery in Latin American obstetrics and gynecology journals indexed in Scopus. Medwave. 2019;19(5):e7658. Spanish, English. doi:10.5867/medwave.2019.05.7658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweileh WM, Huijer HA, Al-Jabi SW, et al. Nursing and midwifery research activity in Arab countries from 1950 to 2017. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):340. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4178-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goyet S, Sauvegrain P, Schantz C, et al. State of midwifery research in France. Midwifery. 2018;64:101–109. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iribarren S, Stonbraker S, Larsen B, et al. Clinical nursing and midwifery research in Latin American and Caribbean countries: a scoping review. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018;24(2):e12623. doi:10.1111/ijn.12623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaton HJ. Mapping the literature of nurse-midwifery. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94(2 Suppl):E80–6. doi:10.1111/ijn.12623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Lee IS, Lee H, et al. Bibliometric analysis of moxibustion research trends over the past 20 years. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1254. doi:10.3390/jcm9051254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Zhang H, Luo Y, et al. The 100 top-cited articles in diabetic kidney disease: a bibliometric analysis. Ren Fail. 2021;43(1):781–795. doi:10.1080/0886022X.2021.1919528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djoutsop OM, Mbougo JV, Kanmounye US. Global head and neck surgery research during the COVID pandemic: a bibliometric analysis. Ann Med Surg. 2021;68:102555. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazhari S. The 100 top-cited articles published in psychiatric journals. J PsychiatrPract. 2013;19(4):327–338. doi:10.1097/01.pra.0000432604.06835.da
   Google Scholar
• Radosh PF. Midwifery: alternative care for pregnancy and childbirth. Curr Contents. 1988;21:3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129–1145. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Hoope-Bender P, de Bernis L, Campbell J, et al. Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. Lancet. 2014;384(9949):1226–1235. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60930-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ. 2009;181(6–7):377–383. doi:10.1503/cmaj.081869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KC, Daviss BA. Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. BMJ. 2005;330(7505):1416. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1416
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tracy SK, Hartz DL, Tracy MB, et al. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: m@NGO, a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9906):1723–1732. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61406-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foureur M, Besley K, Burton G, Yu N, Crisp J. Enhancing the resilience of nurses and midwives: pilot of a mindfulness-based program for increased health, sense of coherence and decreased depression, anxiety and stress. Contemp Nurse. 2013;45(1):114–125. doi:10.5172/conu.2013.45.1.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Davey MA, et al. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2012;119(12):1483–1492. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03446.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan B. Cosmopolitical obstetrics: some insights from the training of traditional midwives. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(9):925–37;discussion 937–44. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(89)90317-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter B. Conflicting ideologies as a source of emotion work in midwifery. Midwifery. 2004;20(3):261–272. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2003.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton EK, Reitsma AH, Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003–2006: a retrospective cohort study. Birth. 2009;36(3):180–189. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00322.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer CS, Friberg IK, Dias MA, et al. The projected effect of scaling up midwifery. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1146–1157. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60790-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull D, Holmes A, Shields N, et al. Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care. Lancet. 1996;348(9022):213–218. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(95)11207-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crofts JF, Ellis D, Draycott TJ, Winter C, Hunt LP, Akande VA. Change in knowledge of midwives and obstetricians following obstetric emergency training: a randomised controlled trial of local hospital, simulation centre and teamwork training. BJOG. 2007;114(12):1534–1541. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01493.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen PA, Lee SK, Ryan EM, et al. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. CMAJ. 2002;166(3):315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegers TA, Keirse MJ, van der Zee J, Berghs GA. Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in The Netherlands. BMJ. 1996;313(7068):1309–1313. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1309
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Small R, Lumley J, Donohue L, Potter A, Waldenström U. Randomised controlled trial of midwife led debriefing to reduce maternal depression after operative childbirth. BMJ. 2000;321(7268):1043–1047. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7268.1043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lerberghe W, Matthews Z, Achadi E, et al. Country experience with strengthening of health systems and deployment of midwives in countries with high maternal mortality. Lancet. 2014;384(9949):1215–1225. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60919-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley VA, Cruickshank FM, Lang GD, et al. Midwife managed delivery unit: a randomised controlled comparison with consultant led care. BMJ. 1994;309(6966):1400–1404. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6966.1400
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennedy HP. A model of exemplary midwifery practice: results of a Delphi study. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2000;45(1):4–19. doi:10.1016/S1526-9523(99)00018-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavender T, Walkinshaw SA. Can midwives reduce postpartum psychological morbidity? A randomized trial. Birth. 1998;25(4):215–219. doi:10.1046/j.1523-536X.1998.00215.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg M, Lundgren I, Hermansson E, Wahlberg V. Women’s experience of the encounter with the midwife during childbirth. Midwifery. 1996;12(1):11–15. doi:10.1016/S0266-6138(96)90033-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albers LL, Sedler KD, Bedrick EJ, Teaf D, Peralta P. Midwifery care measures in the second stage of labor and reduction of genital tract trauma at birth: a randomized trial. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005;50(5):365–372. doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darbyshire P. “Rage against the machine?”: nurses’ and midwives’ experiences of using Computerized Patient Information Systems for clinical information. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(1):17–25. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00823.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajek P, West R, Lee A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a midwife-delivered brief smoking cessation intervention in pregnancy. Addiction. 2001;96(3):485–494. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96348511.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDorman MF, Singh GK. Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(5):310–317. doi:10.1136/jech.52.5.310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheyney M, Bovbjerg M, Everson C, Gordon W, Hannibal D, Vedam S. Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(1):17–27. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaire AD, Moos MK, Wells SR. Complementary and alternative medicine in pregnancy: a survey of North Carolina certified nurse-midwives. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(1):19–23. doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00481-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toohill J, Fenwick J, Gamble J, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a psycho-education intervention by midwives in reducing childbirth fear in pregnant women. Birth. 2014;41(4):384–394. doi:10.1111/birt.12136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryding EL, Persson A, Onell C, Kvist L. An evaluation of midwives’ counseling of pregnant women in fear of childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(1):10–17. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.820102.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp N, Hainey K, Liu A, et al. An emerging model of maternity care: smartphone, midwife, doctor? Women Birth. 2014;27(1):64–67. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2013.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlin BL, Gibson MH, O’Rear J, Harman P. A national survey of herbal preparation use by nurse-midwives for labor stimulation. Review of the literature and recommendations for practice. J Nurse Midwifery. 1999;44(3):205–216. doi:10.1016/S0091-2182(99)00037-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Filby A, McConville F, Portela A, Kumar S. What prevents quality midwifery care? A systematic mapping of barriers in low and middle income countries from the provider perspective. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0153391. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley MJ, Hensley MJ, Brinsmead MW, Wlodarczyk JH. Continuity of care by a midwife team versus routine care during pregnancy and birth: a randomised trial. Med J Aust. 1995;163(6):289–293. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb124592.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter B. Emotion work and boundary maintenance in hospital-based midwifery. Midwifery. 2005;21(3):253–266. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2004.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollart L, Skinner VM, Newing C, Foureur M. Factors that may influence midwives work-related stress and burnout. Women Birth. 2013;26(1):26–32. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2011.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amelink-Verburg MP, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Hakkenberg RM, Veldhuijzen IM, Bennebroek Gravenhorst J, Buitendijk SE. Evaluation of 280,000 cases in Dutch midwifery practices: a descriptive study. BJOG. 2008;115(5):570–578. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01580.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren I, Berg M. Central concepts in the midwife-woman relationship. Scand J Caring Sci. 2007;21(2):220–228. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00460.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman IJ, Watson R, Murrells T, Calman L, Redfern S. The validity and reliability of methods to assess the competence to practise of pre-registration nursing and midwifery students. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002;39(2):133–145. doi:10.1016/S0020-7489(01)00028-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor S. What determines quality in maternity care? Comparing the perceptions of childbearing women and midwives. Birth. 1998;25(2):85–93. doi:10.1046/j.1523-536x.1998.00085.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlborg G, Axelsson G, Bodin L. Shift work, nitrous oxide exposure and subfertility among Swedish midwives. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(4):783–790. doi:10.1093/ije/25.4.783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler I. “They”re not the same as us’: midwives’ stereotypes of South Asian descent maternity patients. Sociol Health Illn. 1993;15(2):157–178. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11346882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitz TA, Taylor D, Desai S, et al. Safety of aspiration abortion performed by nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and physician assistants under a California legal waiver. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):454–461. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.301159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heins HC, Nance NW, McCarthy BJ, Efird CM. A randomized trial of nurse-midwifery prenatal care to reduce low birth weight. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75(3 Pt 1):341–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedam S, Stoll K, MacDorman M, et al. Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: impact on access, equity, and outcomes. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192523. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peplonska B, Bukowska A, Sobala W, Sirtori CR. Association of rotating night shift work with BMI and abdominal obesity among nurses and midwives. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133761. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkham M. The culture of midwifery in the National Health Service in England. J Adv Nurs. 1999;30(3):732–739. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01139.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykes F. A critical ethnographic study of encounters between midwives and breast-feeding women in postnatal wards in England. Midwifery. 2005;21(3):241–252. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2004.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biró MA, Waldenström U, Brown S, Pannifex JH. Satisfaction with team midwifery care for low- and high-risk women: a randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2003;30(1):1–10. doi:10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00211.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy PA, Fullerton J. Outcomes of intended home births in nurse-midwifery practice: a prospective descriptive study. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(3):461–470. doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00182-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekscenski ES, Sansom S, Bazell C, Salmon ME, Mullan F. State practice environments and the supply of physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse-midwives. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(19):1266–1271. doi:10.1056/NEJM199411103311905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg M, Asta Ólafsdóttir O, Lundgren I. A midwifery model of woman-centred childbirth care--in Swedish and Icelandic settings. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012;3(2):79–87. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2012.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furness PJ, McSeveny K, Arden MA, Garland C, Dearden AM, Soltani H. Maternal obesity support services: a qualitative study of the perspectives of women and midwives. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;8(11):69. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-69
   Google Scholar
• Harvey S, Jarrell J, Brant R, Stainton C, Rach D. A randomized, controlled trial of nurse-midwifery care. Birth. 1996;23(3):128–135. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.1996.tb00473.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creedy DK, Sidebotham M, Gamble J, Pallant J, Fenwick J. Prevalence of burnout, depression, anxiety and stress in Australian midwives: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):13. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1212-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy HP, Shannon MT, Chuahorm U, Kravetz MK. The landscape of caring for women: a narrative study of midwifery practice. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004;49(1):14–23. doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2003.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmied VA, Duff M, Dahlen HG, Mills AE, Kolt GS. ‘Not waving but drowning’: a study of the experiences and concerns of midwives and other health professionals caring for obese childbearing women. Midwifery. 2011;27(4):424–430. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2010.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beenstock J, Sniehotta FF, White M, Bell R, Milne EM, Araujo-Soares V. What helps and hinders midwives in engaging with pregnant women about stopping smoking? A cross-sectional survey of perceived implementation difficulties among midwives in the North East of England. Implement Sci. 2012;24(7):36. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-36
   Google Scholar
• McDonald G, Jackson D, Wilkes L, Vickers MH. A work-based educational intervention to support the development of personal resilience in nurses and midwives. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(4):378–384. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer CS, Davis GK, Cooke M, Barclay LM. Women’s experiences of continuity of midwifery care in a randomised controlled trial in Australia. Midwifery. 2002;18(2):102–112. doi:10.1054/midw.2002.0298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler J, Abrams B, Parker J, Roberts JM, Laros RK. Supportive nurse-midwife care is associated with a reduced incidence of cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(5):1407–1413. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(11)90773-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinweber J, Rowe HJ. The costs of ‘being with the woman’: secondary traumatic stress in midwifery. Midwifery. 2010;26(1):76–87. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2008.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer CS, Passant L, Brodie PM, et al. The role of the midwife in Australia: views of women and midwives. Midwifery. 2009;25(6):673–681. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2007.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veeramah V. Utilization of research findings by graduate nurses and midwives. J Adv Nurs. 2004;47(2):183–191. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03077.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams N, Jewkes R, Mvo Z. Health care-seeking practices of pregnant women and the role of the midwife in Cape Town, South Africa. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2001;46(4):240–247. doi:10.1016/S1526-9523(01)00138-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley C, Devane D, Clarke M, et al. Comparison of midwife-led and consultant-led care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;29(11):85. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-85
   Google Scholar
• Harvey S, Rach D, Stainton MC, Jarrell J, Brant R. Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care. Midwifery. 2002;18(4):260–267. doi:10.1054/midw.2002.0317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schluter PJ, Turner C, Huntington AD, Bain CJ, McClure RJ. Work/life balance and health: the Nurses and Midwives e-cohort Study. Int Nurs Rev. 2011;58(1):28–36. doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2010.00849.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warenius LU, Faxelid EA, Chishimba PN, Musandu JO, Ongany AA, Nissen EB. Nurse-midwives’ attitudes towards adolescent sexual and reproductive health needs in Kenya and Zambia. Reprod Health Matters. 2006;14(27):119–128. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(06)27242-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker JS, Hall MH, Howie PW, et al. Should obstetricians see women with normal pregnancies? A multicentre randomised controlled trial of routine antenatal care by general practitioners and midwives compared with shared care led by obstetricians. BMJ. 1996;312(7030):554–559. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7030.554
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forster DA, McLachlan HL, Davey MA, et al. Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women’s satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;3(16):28. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0798-y
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson G, Ahlborg G, Bodin L. Shift work, nitrous oxide exposure, and spontaneous abortion among Swedish midwives. Occup Environ Med. 1996;53(6):374–378. doi:10.1136/oem.53.6.374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit C, Wrede S, Bourgeault I, Sandall J, De Vries R, van Teijlingen ER. Understanding the social organisation of maternity care systems: midwifery as a touchstone. Sociol Health Illn. 2005;27(6):722–737. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00471.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen K, Spiby H, Slade P. Exposure to traumatic perinatal experiences and posttraumatic stress symptoms in midwives: prevalence and association with burnout. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(2):578–587. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildingsson I, Westlund K, Wiklund I. Burnout in Swedish midwives. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2013;4(3):87–91. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2013.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högberg U. The decline in maternal mortality in Sweden: the role of community midwifery. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(8):1312–1320. doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.8.1312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halldorsdottir S, Karlsdottir SI. The primacy of the good midwife in midwifery services: an evolving theory of professionalism in midwifery. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011;25(4):806–817. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00886.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wagner V, Epoo B, Nastapoka J, Harney E. Reclaiming birth, health, and community: midwifery in the Inuit villages of Nunavik, Canada. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52(4):384–391. doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.03.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioffi J, Purcal N, Arundell F. A pilot study to investigate the effect of a simulation strategy on the clinical decision making of midwifery students. J Nurs Educ. 2005;44(3):131–134. doi:10.3928/01484834-20050301-06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tincello DG, Williams A, Fowler GE, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Alfirevic Z. Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors. BJOG. 2003;110(12):1041–1044. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.03030.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Alten D, Eskes M, Treffers PE; Midwifery in The Netherlands. The Wormerveer study; selection, mode of delivery, perinatal mortality and infant morbidity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(6):656–662. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03279.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyman VM, Prebensen AK, Flensner GE. Obese women’s experiences of encounters with midwives and physicians during pregnancy and childbirth. Midwifery. 2010;26(4):424–429. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2008.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C, Bain C, Schluter PJ, et al.; Nurses and Midwives e-cohort Group. Cohort Profile: the Nurses and Midwives e-Cohort Study--a novel electronic longitudinal study. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(1):53–60. doi:10.1093/ije/dym294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappin DM, Lumsden MA, Gilmour WH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of home based motivational interviewing by midwives to help pregnant smokers quit or cut down. BMJ. 2005;331(7513):373–377. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7513.373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh D. An ethnographic study of women’s experience of partnership caseload midwifery practice: the professional as a friend. Midwifery. 1999;15(3):165–176. doi:10.1016/S0266-6138(99)90061-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter B, Warren L. Midwives׳ experiences of workplace resilience. Midwifery. 2014;30(8):926–934. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell GA, Shafiei T. Workplace aggression, including bullying in nursing and midwifery: a descriptive survey (the SWAB study). Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(11):1423–1431. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chib A. The Aceh Besar midwives with mobile phones project: design and evaluation perspectives using the information and communication technologies for healthcare development model. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2010;15(3):500–525. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01515.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffney L, Smith CA. Use of complementary therapies in pregnancy: the perceptions of obstetricians and midwives in South Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44(1):24–29. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00161.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck CT, LoGiudice J, Gable RK. A mixed-methods study of secondary traumatic stress in certified nurse-midwives: shaken belief in the birth process. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):16–23. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida Y, Sandall J. Occupational burnout and work factors in community and hospital midwives: a survey analysis. Midwifery. 2013;29(8):921–926. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan K, Lock L, Homer CS. Factors that contribute to midwives staying in midwifery: a study in one area health service in New South Wales, Australia. Midwifery. 2011;27(3):331–335. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2011.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry NS. Kaqchikel midwives, home births, and emergency obstetric referrals in Guatemala: contextualizing the choice to stay at home. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(8):1958–1969. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devane D, Lalor J. Midwives’ visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(2):133–141. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03575.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amelink-Verburg MP, Buitendijk SE. Pregnancy and labour in the Dutch maternity care system: what is normal? The role division between midwives and obstetricians. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010;55(3):216–225. doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter B. The importance of reciprocity in relationships between community-based midwives and mothers. Midwifery. 2006;22(4):308–322. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2005.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt C. Supporting choice and control? Communication and interaction between midwives and women at the antenatal booking visit. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(6):1307–1318. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabroe S, Olsen J. Perinatal correlates of specific histological types of testicular cancer in patients below 35 years of age: a case-cohort study based on midwives’ records in Denmark. Int J Cancer. 1998;78(2):140–143. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19981005)78:2<140::AID-IJC2>3.0.CO;2-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blix E, Sviggum O, Koss KS, Øian P. Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts. BJOG. 2003;110(1):1–5. doi:10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.t01-1-02105.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dardas LA, Sawair FA, Nabolsi M, et al. Nursing research in the Arab Region: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019;25(3):e12716. doi:10.1111/ijn.12716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özen Çınar İ. Bibliometric analysis of breast cancer research in the period 2009–2018. Int J Nurs Pract. 2020;26(3):e12845. doi:10.1111/ijn.12845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam WW, Wong EL, Wong FC, et al. Citation classics: top 50 cited articles in “respiratory system”. Respirology. 2013;18(1):71–81. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02262.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltussen A, Kindler CH. Citation classics in critical care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(5):902–910. doi:10.1007/s00134-004-2195-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadgan B, Roig M, Hajghanbari B, et al. Top-cited articles in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(5):806–815. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim ES, Yoon DY, Kim HJ, et al. Citation classics in neurointerventional research: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles. J NeurointervSurg. 2017;9(5):508–511. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce FA, Lozano AM. Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part I: the 100 top-cited papers in neurosurgical journals. J Neurol Surg. 2010;112(2):223–232. doi:10.3171/2009.12.JNS091599
   Google Scholar
• Tang X, Gong W, Yuan F, et al. Top-cited articles in digestive system disease from 1950 to 2013. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(1):107–111. doi:10.1111/jgh.13032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G. Could the impact factor be obsolete? Will it be replaced soon by other indexes?. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol . 2020;95(2):53–54. doi:10.1016/j.oftal.2019.12.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shanbhag VK. Journal impact factor. Biomed J. 2016;39(3):225. doi:10.1016/j.bj.2015.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eley DS, Toosi M, Modarres M, Amini M, Geranmayeh M. The clinician-scientist track: an approach addressing Australia’s need for a pathway to train its future clinical academic workforce. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):227. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1337-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinto M, Pulgarín A, Escalona MI. Viewing information literacy concepts: a comparison of two branches of knowledge. Scientometrics. 2014;98(3):2311–2329. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1166-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khudzari JM, Kurian J, Tartakovsky B, et al. Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on microbial fuel cells using Scopus database. Biochem Eng J. 2018;136:51–60. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2018.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce FA, Lozano AM. Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part II: the citation classics. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(2):233–246. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.JNS091600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Fernández FJ, García-Fernández AE, Ikuta I, et al. A bibliometric evaluation of the top 100 cited dimethyl fumarate articles. Molecules. 2021;26(4):1085. doi:10.3390/molecules26041085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad SJ, Ahmed AR, Kowalewski KF, et al. Citation classics in general medical journals: assessing the quality of evidence; a systematic review. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2020;13(2):101–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balica A, Kohut A, Tsai TJ, et al. A bibliometric analysis of citation classics in the journal of ultrasound in medicine. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(7):1289–1297. doi:10.1002/jum.15220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar