Characterizing Different Multidisciplinary Team Models Implemented Within One Comprehensive Cancer Center

References

• Dictionary of Cancer Terms. Definition: multidisciplinary. US: National Cancer Institute. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/search/results?swKeyword=multidisciplinary. Accessed February 19, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta T. Multidisciplinary clinics in oncology: the hidden pitfalls. J Oncol Pract. 2007;3(2):72–73. doi:10.1200/JOP.0722505
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borras JM, Albreht T, Audisio R, et al. Policy statement on multidisciplinary cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(3):475–480. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Multidisciplinary cancer care. Literature review. Melbourne: State of Victoria; 2012. Available from: www.health.vic.gov.au/cancer. Accessed February 19, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Boomsma F, van Harten W, Oberst S, et al. Accreditation and designation user manual version 2.0. Brussels-Genoa: Eurocan Platform. Available from: https://www.oeci.eu/Attachments/OECI_ACC_Manual_2_0.pdf. Accessed February 19, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Pillay B, Wootten AC, Crowe H, et al. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;42:56–72. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brar SS, Hong NL, Wright FC. Multidisciplinary cancer care: does it improve outcomes? J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(5):494–499. doi:10.1002/jso.23700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croke J, El-Sayed S. Multidisciplinary management of cancer patients: chasing a shadow or real value? An overview of the literature. Curr Oncol. 2012;19(4):232–238. doi:10.3747/co.19.944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prades J, Borràs JM. Multidisciplinary cancer care in Spain, or when the function creates the organ: qualitative interview study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bunnell CA, Weingart SN, Swanson S, Mamon HJ, Shulman LN. Models of multidisciplinary cancer care: physician and patient perceptions in a comprehensive cancer center. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6(6):283–288. doi:10.1200/JOP.2010.000138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taberna M, Gil Moncayo F, Jané-Salas E, et al. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach and quality of care. Front Oncol. 2020;10:85. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.00085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulff CN, Thygesen M, Søndergaard J, Vedsted P. Case management used to optimize cancer care pathways: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8(1):1–7. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ansmann L, Kowalski C, Pfaff H, Wuerstlein R, Wirtz MA, Ernstmann N. Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences. Breast. 2014;23(6):865–869. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2014.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butow P, Harrison JD, Choy ET, Young JM, Spillane A, Evans A. Health professional and consumer views on involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan. Cancer. 2007;110(9):1937–1944. doi:10.1002/cncr.23007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jazieh AR. Tumor boards: beyond the patient care conference. J Cancer Educ. 2011;26(3):405–408. doi:10.1007/s13187-011-0209-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright F, De Vito C, Langer B, Hunter A. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43(6):1002–1010. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2007.01.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatcliffe TA, Coleman RL. Tumor board: more than treatment planning—a 1-year prospective survey. J Cancer Educ. 2008;23(4):235–237. doi:10.1080/08858190802189014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer RD, Prime MS. A clinician’s perspective on co-developing and co-implementing a digital tumor board solution. Health Informatics J. 2020;26(3):2213–2221. doi:10.1177/1460458219899841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page AJ, Cosgrove D, Elnahal SM, Herman JM, Pawlik TM. Organizing a multidisciplinary clinic. Chin Clin Oncol. 2014;3(4):3865.
   Google Scholar
• Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L. Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(11):935–943. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70940-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Interpe Develop. 2017;2017:57–89.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge Cambridge University Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera RF, Mourgues C, Alarcón LF, Pellicer E. Understanding interactions between design team members of construction projects using social network analysis. J Constr Eng Manage. 2020;146(6):04020053. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockhart NC. Social network analysis as an analytic tool for task group research: a case study of an interdisciplinary community of practice. J Special Group Work. 2017;42(2):152–175. doi:10.1080/01933922.2017.1301610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marqués-Sánchez P, Muñoz-Doyague MF, Martínez YV, et al. The importance of external contacts in job performance: a study in healthcare organizations using social network analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7):1345. doi:10.3390/ijerph15071345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancer for Europe. Seven leading cancer centers improve cancer health in Europe. Available from: https://cancercoreeurope.eu/. Accessed February 19, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC). Non più solo assistenza ma anche comunicazione e ricerca [Not only assistance but also communication and research]. Milan: Fondazione AIRC per la Ricerca sul Cancro; 2018. Italian. Available from: https://www.airc.it/news/non-piu-solo-assistenza-ma-anche-comunicazione-e-ricerca. Accessed February 19, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly D, Campbell P, Torrens C, et al. The effectiveness of nurse-led interventions for cancer symptom management 2000–2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Sci Rev. 2022;2022:100052.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr H, Donovan M, McSorley O. Evaluation of the role of the clinical nurse specialist in cancer care: an integrative literature review. Eur J Cancer Care. 2021;30(3):e13415. doi:10.1111/ecc.13415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson P, Oleni M, Fridlund B. Patient satisfaction with nursing care in the context of health care: a literature study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2002;16(4):337–344. doi:10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00094.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koç Z, Saglam Z, Senol M. Patient satisfaction with the nursing care in hospital/hastanede hemsirelik bakimi ile ilgili hasta memnuniyeti. Türkiye Klinikleri Tip Bilimleri Dergisi. 2011;31(3):629.
   Google Scholar
• Mihaljevic AL, Doerr-Harim C, Kalkum E, Strunk G. Measuring patient centeredness with German language PATIENT-REPORTED EXPERIENCE MEasures (PREM) - A systematic review and qualitative analysis according to COSMIN. PLoS One. 2022;17(11):e0264045. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer JA, Jackson VA, Meier DE, Temel JS. Early integration of palliative care services with standard oncology care for patients with advanced cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(5):349–363. doi:10.3322/caac.21192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamprell K, Arnolda G, Delaney GP, Liauw W, Braithwaite J. The challenge of putting principles into practice: resource tensions and real‐world constraints in multidisciplinary oncology team meetings. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019;15(4):199–207. doi:10.1111/ajco.13166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwal A, Caldwell K. Do multidisciplinary integrated care pathways improve interprofessional collaboration? Scand J Caring Sci. 2002;16(4):360–367. doi:10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00101.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, et al. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(14):1480–1510. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunelli C, Zito E, Alfieri S, et al. Knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a comprehensive cancer center. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s12885-022-09269-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giolla Easpaig B N, Tran Y, Bierbaum M, et al. What are the attitudes of health professionals regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in oncology practice? A mixed-method synthesis of the qualitative evidence. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, Vincent C, Green JS, Sevdalis N. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2116–2125. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar