Factors Impacting User Engagement in Reablement: A Qualitative Study of User, Family Member and Practitioners' Views

References

• Aspinal F, Glasby J, Rostgaard T, et al. New horizons: reablement - supporting older people towards Independence. Age Ageing. 2016;45:574–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Care Institute for Excellence. Role and principles of reablement; 2020. Available from: https://www.scie.org.uk/reablement/what-is/principles-of-reablement. Accessed March 20, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Metzelthin SF, Rostgaard T, Parsons M, et al. Development of an internationally accepted definition of reablement: a delphi study. Ageing Soc. 2020;2020:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Moe CF, Brinchmann BS. Optimising capacity – a service user and caregiver perspective on reablement. Grounded Theory Rev. 2016;15(2):25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, Tuntland H, Førland O, et al. Driving forces for home-based reablement; a qualitative study of older adults’ experiences. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25:1581–1589. doi:10.1111/hsc.12324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzelthin SF, Zijlstra GA, Van Rossum E, et al. ‘Doing with…’rather than ‘doing for…’older adults: rationale and content of the ‘stay active at home’programme. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31:1419–1430. doi:10.1177/0269215517698733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson LK, Anbäcken EM, Elfström M, et al. Working with short-term goal-directed reablement with older adults: strengthened by a collaborative approach. Nord J Nurs Res. 2019;39:178–185. doi:10.1177/2057158519850974
   Google Scholar
• Ingstad K, Moe A, Brataas HV. Patient involvement during a pathway of home-based reablement for older persons: a longitudinal single-case study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:1911–1921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vluggen S, Buma L, Resnick B. Reablement services across the world: effectiveness and impacting factors. Innov Aging. 2021;5(Supplement_1):418. doi:10.1093/geroni/igab046.1611
   Google Scholar
• Ambugo EA, Dar I, Bikova MS, et al. A qualitative study on promoting reablement among older people living at home in Norway: opportunities and constraints. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1–13. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07543-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Care Institute for Excellence. Maximising the potential of reablement; 2013. Available from: https://www.scie.org.uk/publications/guides/guide49/roleoffamilies.asp. Accessed December 10, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuc N, Beresford B. Reablement: a unique approach to regaining, maintaining, or improving independence in daily life. In: Rootman I, Edwards P, Levasseur M, Grunberg F, editors. Promoting the Health of Older Adults: The Canadian Experience. Tornoto: Canadian Scholars; 2021:421–433.
   Google Scholar
• Jokstad K, Skovdahl K, Landmark BT, et al. Ideal and reality; community healthcare professionals’ experiences of user-involvement in reablement. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;27(4):907–916. doi:10.1111/hsc.12708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buma LE, Vluggen S, Zwakhalen S, Kempen GIJM, Metzelthin SF. Effects on clients’ daily functioning and common features of reablement interventions: a systematic literature review. Eur J Ageing. 2022;1–27. doi:10.1007/s10433-022-00682-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotworthy A, Kusumastuti S, Westendorp RGJ. Reablement through time and space: a scoping review of how the concept of ‘reablement’ for older people has been defined and operationalised. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:61. doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01958-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford BA, Mann RC, Parker GM, et al. Reablement services for people at risk of needing social care: the MoRe mixed-methods evaluation. Health Serv Delivery Res. 2019;2019:1–254.
   Google Scholar
• Legg L, Gladman J, Drummond A, et al. A systematic review of the evidence on home care reablement services. Clin Rehabil. 2015;30:741–749. doi:10.1177/0269215515603220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson C, Iwarsson S. Evidence-based interventions involving occupational therapists are needed in re-ablement for older community-living people: a systematic review. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80(5):273–285. doi:10.1177/0308022617691537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane M, Cagney O, Cochrane A, et al. Reablement in the home for people aged 65 years and over: components, effectiveness, and influencing factors. An evidence review. Dublin: Health Research Board; 2021. Available from: https://www.hrb.ie/publications/. Accessed October 8, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Stausholm MN, Pape-Haugaard L, Hejlesen OK, et al. Reablement professionals’ perspectives on client characteristics and factors associated with successful home-based reablement: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:1–665. doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06625-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzelthin SF, Rooijackers TH, Zijlstra GAR, et al. Effects, costs and feasibility of the ‘stay active at home’ reablement training programme for home care professionals: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:276. doi:10.1186/s12877-018-0968-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assander S, Bergström A, Eriksson C, Meijer S, Guidetti S. ASSIST: a reablement program for older adults in Sweden – a feasibility study. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(618). doi:10.1186/s12877-022-03185-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearson M, Hunt H, Cooper C, et al. Providing effective and preferred care closer to home: a realist review of intermediate care. Health Soc Care Community. 2015;23(6):577–593. doi:10.1111/hsc.12183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessier A, Beaulieu MD, Mcginn CA, et al. Effectiveness of reablement: a systematic review. Health Policy. 2016;11(4):49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Moe C, Brinchmann BS. Tailoring reablement: a grounded theory study of establishing reablement in a community setting in Norway. Health Soc Care Community. 2018;26(1):113–121. doi:10.1111/hsc.12471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, Skutle O, Alvsvåg H, et al. Reablement teams’ roles: a qualitative study of interdisciplinary teams’ experiences. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:305–316. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S160480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, Alvsvåg H, Førland O. The relatives’ voice: how do relatives experience participation in reablement? A qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10:1–11. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S122385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen FA, Vik K, Ytterhus B. The art of maintaining everyday life: collaboration among older parents, their adult children, and health care professionals in reablement. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019;12:269–280. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S195833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giosa JL, Byrne K, Stolee P. Person- and family-centred goal-setting for older adults in Canadian home care: a solution-focused approach. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(5):e2445–e2456. doi:10.1111/hsc.13685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumpter L Facilitating family engagement in older people’s home-based reablement: a realist inquiry [dissertation]. Bristol: University of the West of England; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Mulquiny L, Oakman J. Exploring the experience of reablement: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of older people’s and carers‘views. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(5):e1471–e1483. doi:10.1111/hsc.13837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blendell R, Ojo O. Evaluation of the factors that promote improved experience and better outcomes of older adults in intermediate care setting. J. 2020;3:20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell K, Louie P, Levine B, Gililland J. Using patient engagement platforms in the postoperative management of patients. Curr Rev Musculoskelet. 2020;13(4):479–484. doi:10.1007/s12178-020-09638-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming MD, Shim JK, Yen I, Thompson-Lastad A, Burke NJ. Patient engagement, chronic illness, and the subject of health care reform. Med Anthropol. 2021;40(3):214–227. doi:10.1080/01459740.2020.1820500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groccia JE. What is student engagement? New Dir Teach Learn. 2018;2018(154):11–20. doi:10.1002/tl.20287
   Google Scholar
• Knight C, Patterson M, Dawson J. Building work engagement: a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. J Organ Behav. 2017;38:792–812. doi:10.1002/job.2167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbah M. Can local knowledge make the difference? Rethinking universities’ community engagement and prospect for sustainable community development. J Environ Educ. 2019;50(1):11–22. doi:10.1080/00958964.2018.1462136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles LK, Kay D, Luker JA, et al. Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: a systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0261808. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli W. Work engagement: what do we know and where do we go? Rom J Appl Psychol. 2012;14:3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bright FAS, Kayes NM, Worrall L, et al. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:643–654. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.933899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins T, Larson E, Schnall R. Unraveling the meaning of patient engagement: a concept analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:30–36. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhardt F, Dolva AS, Jahnsen R, et al. Exploring two subdimensions of participation, involvement and engagement: a scoping review. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;29(6):441–463. doi:10.1080/11038128.2021.1950207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelders SM, Van Zyl LE, Ludden GD. The concept and components of engagement in different domains applied to ehealth: a systematic scoping review. Front Psychol. 2020;11:926. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graffigna G, Barello S, Riva G, et al. Italian consensus statement on patient engagement in chronic care: process and outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):1–27. doi:10.3390/ijerph17114167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarron TL, Noseworthy T, Moffat K, et al. A co-designed framework to support and sustain patient and family engagement in health-care decision making. Health Expect. 2020;23:825–836. doi:10.1111/hex.13054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerofke-Owen TA, McAndrew NS, Gralton KS, et al. Engagement of families in the care of hospitalized pediatric patients: a scoping review. J Fam Nurs. 2022;28:151–171. doi:10.1177/10748407211048894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levoy K, Rivera E, McHugh M, Hanlon A, Hirschman KB, Naylor MD. Caregiver engagement enhances outcomes among randomized control trials of transitional care interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Care. 2022;60:519–529. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E, et al. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13:98. doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta K, Gorski I, Liu C, Weinstein S, Brua C, Christensen A. Expanding engagement opportunities at a large land-grant research university: the engagement ecosystem model. J Community Engagem Scholarsh. 2015;8:44–58. doi:10.54656/KDYK3110
   Google Scholar
• Maslowska E, Malthouse EC, Collinger T. The customer engagement ecosystem. J Mark Manag. 2016;32:469–501. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2015.1134628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredericks J, Tomitsch M, Haeusler MH. Redefining community engagement in smart cities: design patterns for a smart engagement ecosystem. In: Citizen-Responsive Urban E-Planning: Recent Developments and Critical Perspectives. IGI Global; 2020:13–53.
   Google Scholar
• Graffigna G, Barello S, Riva G, et al. Fertilizing a patient engagement ecosystem to innovate healthcare: toward the first Italian consensus conference on patient engagement. Front Psychol. 2017;8:812. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins A, Downes C, Murphy R, et al. Factors influencing attendees’ engagement with group psychoeducation: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022;49(4):539–551. doi:10.1007/s10488-021-01182-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew E, Beresford B, Laver-Fawcett A, et al. The Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale – reablement Version (HRERS-RV): development and psychometric properties. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;27:777–787. doi:10.1111/hsc.12696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nntional Institute for Health can Care Excellence. Intermediate care including reablement NICE guideline [NG74]; 2017. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng74/chapter/Recommendations#core-principles-of-intermediate-care-including-reablement. Accessed December 10, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Glendinning CJK, Baxter K, Rabiee P, et al. Home care reablement services: investigating the longer-term impacts. York: University of York; 2011. Available from: Reablement.indd(york.ac.uk). Accessed June 10, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Sumpter L, Powell J, Turton A, et al. Effective mechanisms in applying reablement: what works when engaging families in the reablement of older people, for whom and how? Paper presented at: Transforming Care; June 24; 2019; Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Social Care Institute for Excellence. Reablement for care workers e-learning course; 2021. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20407308/. Accessed December 20, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Mjøsund HL, Moe CF, Burton E, et al. Promotion of physical activity through reablement for older adults: exploring healthcare professionals’ clinical reasoning. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:1623–1635. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S315553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiee P, Glendinning C. Organisation and delivery of home care re-ablement: what makes a difference? Health Soc Care Community. 2011;19:495–503. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01010.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibsdall L A realist synthesis and evaluation of the role and impact of occupational therapists in reablement services [Dissertation]. Bristol: University of the West of England; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon Y-H, Simpson JM, Low L-F, et al. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) and realist evaluation of the interdisciplinary home-bAsed reablement program (I-HARP) for improving functional independence of community dwelling older people with dementia: an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:199. doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1216-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokstad K, Hauge S, Landmark BT, et al. Control as a core component of user involvement in reablement: a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:1079–1088. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S269200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson LK, Östlund G, Zander V, et al. ‘Best fit’caring skills of an interprofessional team in short-term goal-directed reablement: older adults’ perceptions. Scand J Caring Sci. 2019;33:498–506. doi:10.1111/scs.12650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooijackers TH, Kempen GI, Zijlstra GR, et al. Effectiveness of a reablement training program for homecare staff on older adults’ sedentary behavior: a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69:2566–2578. doi:10.1111/jgs.17286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The EAGER project - Social Policy Research Unit, University of York; 2022. Available from: https://www.york.ac.uk/spru/projects/the-eager-project/. Accessed March 1, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury-Jones C, Breckenridge J, Clark MT, et al. The state of qualitative research in health and social science literature: a focused mapping review and synthesis. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20:627–645. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1270583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman MA, Saldana J, eds. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. SAGE Publications; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:1–8. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon J, Faubert J. Framing experience: concept maps, mind maps, and data collection in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8:68–83. doi:10.1177/160940690900800307
   Google Scholar
• Nelson LA, Coston TD, Cherrington AL, et al. Patterns of user engagement with mobile- and web-delivered self-care interventions for adults with T2DM: a review of the literature. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(7):1–20. doi:10.1007/s11892-016-0755-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett CE, Sykes C, Pires-Yfantouda R. Interventions to increase engagement with rehabilitation in adults with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;27:959–982. doi:10.1080/09602011.2015.1090459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijkerk LE, Oenema A, Geschwind N, et al. Measuring engagement with mental health and behavior change interventions: an integrative review of methods and instruments. Int J Behav Med. 2022;2022:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien HL, Toms EG. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J Am Soc. 2008;59:938–955.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker C, Teehan M, Ursuliak Z, et al. S238. Patient engagement to early intervention in psychosis services: retrospective analysis of engagement patterns. Schizophr Bull. 2020;46:S129–S130. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaa031.304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vik K, Eide AH. The exhausting dilemmas faced by home-care service providers when enhancing participation among older adults receiving home care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012;26(3):528–536. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00960.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen FA, Vik K. Health professionals’ perspectives of next of kin in the context of reablement. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(16):1882–1889. doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1450452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaaen J, Vik K. Becoming an enabler of everyday activity: health professionals in home care services experiences of working with reablement. Int J Older People Nurs. 2019;14:e12270. doi:10.1111/opn.12270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes L, Johnson E, Tarrant A. Professionalisation at work in adult social care: report to the all-party parliamentary group on adult social care, July 2019; 2019. Available from: https://www.gmb.org.uk/sites/default/files/Professionalisation_at_Work_0309.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Kokorelias KM, Gignac MA, Naglie G, Cameron JI. Towards a universal model of family centered care: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1–11. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4394-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood N, Smith R. The oldest carers: a narrative review and synthesis of the experiences of carers aged over 75 years. Maturitas. 2016;94:161–172. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn EI, Paans W, van der Schans CP, Jaarsma T, Luttik MLA, Keers JC. Family caregivers’ perceived level of collaboration with hospital nurses: a cross-sectional study. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29:1064–1072. doi:10.1111/jonm.13244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunde OS, Vatne S, Ytrehus S. Professionals’ understanding of their responsibilities in the collaboration with family caregivers of older persons with mental health problems in Norway. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30:1325–1333. doi:10.1111/hsc.13456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. The Care Act 2014. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/23/enacted. Accessed March 10, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke G, Lloyd L, Bezzina A, Cameron A, Jessiman T, Smith R. Supporting older co-resident carers of older people – the impact of care act implementation in four local authorities in England. Soc Policy Soc. 2021;20:371–384. doi:10.1017/S1474746420000202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Education England. The future doctor programme a co-created vision for the future clinical team; 2020. Available from: https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Future%20Doctor%20Co-Created%20Vision%20-%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed December 20, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Phoenix M, Jack SM, Rosenbaum PL, et al. A grounded theory of parents’ attendance, participation and engagement in children’s developmental rehabilitation services: part 2. The journey to child health and happiness. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(15):2151–2160. doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1555618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Chiarello LA, Ideishi R, et al. The complexities and synergies of engagement: an ethnographic study of engagement in outpatient pediatric rehabilitation sessions. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(16):2353–2365. doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1700562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Care Institute for Excellence. Integrated care research and practice; 2023. Available from: https://www.scie.org.uk/integrated-care/research-practice/enablers/asset-based-places. Accessed March 27, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• NHS England. Quick Guide: Discharge to Assess; 2016. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/keogh-review/Documents/quick-guides/Quick-Guide-discharge-to-access.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2023.
   Google Scholar