A Scale Development for Visual Literacy on Health Students and Professionals

References

• Singh S, Dhaliwal U, Singh N. Developing humanistic competencies within the competency-based curriculum. Indian Pediatr. 2020;57(11):1060–1066. doi:10.1007/s13312-020-2036-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debes J. Some foundations for visual literacy. Audiovisual Instr. 1968;13:961–964.
   Google Scholar
• IVLA. What is “Visual Literacy?” 2012. Available from: http://ivla.org/new/what-is-visual-literacy-2/. Accessed October 25, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Topiel EG. Experiencing Visual Literacy: How to Use it as a Tool to Impact Comprehension Skills [ Master’s thesis]. New Jersey, USA: Rowan University Reading Education; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Metros SE. The educator’s role in preparing visually literate learners. Theory Pract. 2008;47(2):102–109. doi:10.1080/00405840801992264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin K Patient deception of doctors: industry view; 2014. Available from: http://www.softwareadvice.com/medical/industryview/patient-deception-report-2014/. Accessed October 25, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Aita VA, Lydiatt WM, Gilbert MA. Portraits of care: medical research through portraiture. Med Humanit. 2010;36(1):5–13. doi:10.1136/jmh.2009.003780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aita V, Lydiatt W, Gilbert M, McGraw H, Masuoka M. Here I am and nowhere else: portraits of care by Mark Gilbert at the intersection of art and medicine. Literature Arts & Medicine Magazine; 2009. Available from: http://medhum.med.nyu.edu/blog/?p=172. Accessed October 23, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Katz JT, Khoshbin S. Can visual arts training improve physician performance? Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2014;125:331–342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalia Y, Milam EC, Rieder EA. Art in medical education: a review. J Grad Med Educ. 2020;12(6):686–695. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-20-00093.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kress G, van Leeuwen T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London, UK: Routledge; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn N. Visual narrative structure. Cogn Sci. 2013;37(3):413–452. doi:10.1111/cogs.12016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn N. Visual narrative comprehension: universal or not? Psychon Bull Rev. 2020;27(2):266–285. doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01670-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasani SK, Saks NS. Utilizing visual art to enhance the clinical observation skills of medical students. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):e1327–e1331. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.770131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klugman CM, Peel J, Beckmann-Mendez D. Art rounds: teaching interprofessional students visual thinking strategies at one school. Acad Med. 2011;86(10):1266–1271. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822c1427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavec A, Drnovšek M. A perspective on scale development in entrepreneurship research. Econ Bus Rev. 2012;14(1):39–62. doi:10.15458/2335-4216.1203
   Google Scholar
• Arias MRM, Lloreda MJH, Lloreda MVH. Psicometría. Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs Res. 2004;48(2):175–186. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 24.0. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle JL. IBM SPSS Amos 24 User’s Guide. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. A second generation of little jiffy. Psychometrika. 1970;35(4):401–415. doi:10.1007/BF02291817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF, Little Jiffy RJ, Mark IV. Little Jiffy, Mark Iv. Educ Psychol Meas. 1974;34(1):111–117. doi:10.1177/001316447403400115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett MS. Tests of significance in factor analysis. Br J Psychol. 1950;3:77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett MS. A further note on tests of significance in factor analysis. Br J Psychol. 1951;4:1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziuban D, Shirkey EC. When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol Bull. 1974;81(6):358–361. doi:10.1037/h0036316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008;6:53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK. Pesquisa de Marketing: Uma Orientação Aplicada [Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation]. 6th ed. São Paulo, Brazil: Bookman; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant J. SPSS Survival Manual. A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS. 4th ed. Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31–36. doi:10.1007/BF02291575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent MG. The importance of window view: using an exploratory factor analysis to uncover the underlying latent dimensions; 2018. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mj1b1vz. Accessed February 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Abdi H. Factor rotations in factor analyses. In: Lewis-Beck M, Bryman A, editors. Encyclopedia of Social Sciences Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage; 2003:792–795.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill GA. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Market Res. 1979;16(1):64–73. doi:10.1177/002224377901600110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton B, Muthen B, Alwin DF, Summers G. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociol Methodol. 1977;8(1):84–136. doi:10.2307/270754
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: Allyn and Bacon; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Routledge; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Koufteros XA. Testing a model of pull production: a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling. J Operat Manage. 1999;17(4):467–488. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00002-9
   Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online. 2003;8:23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker LR, Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1973;38(1):1–10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equatios Model. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equation Model. 2007;14(3):464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(2):130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva RPA, Macêdo LCB, Silva IL. Avaliação das características psicométricas dos questionáriosutilizados nos periódicos da área contábil: um estudo longitudinalcompreendido no período 2003–2012 [Assessment of the psychometric characteristics of questionnaires used in accounting periodicals: a longitudinal study covering the period 2003-2012]. Available from: https://anaiscbc.emnuvens.com.br/anais/article/view/124/124. Accessed February 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 1981;18(1):39. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson D. Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha CM, Almeida Neto OP, Stackfleth R. Main psychometric evaluation methods of measuring instruments reliability. Rev Atenção Saúde. 2016;14:98–103.
   Google Scholar
• ArslanR, NalinciGZ. Development of visual literacy levels scale in higher education. Turkish Online J Educ Technol. 2014;13(2):61–70.
   Google Scholar