A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature

References

• US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of HealthPubMed.gov [homepage on the Internet]Bethesda, MDNational Center for Biotechnology Information, US National Library of Medicine Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedAccessed February 1, 2013
   Google Scholar
• US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of HealthPubMed.gov [webpage on the Internet]Bethesda, MDNational Center for Biotechnology Information, US National Library of Medicine2013 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=depression+systematic+reviewAccessed February 1, 2013
   Google Scholar
• US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of HealthPubMed.gov [webpage on the Internet]Bethesda, MDNational Center for Biotechnology Information, US National Library of Medicine2013 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=cancer+systematic+reviewAccessed February 1, 2013
   Google Scholar
• GreavesCSheppardKAbrahamCSystematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventionsBMC Public Health201111111921333011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TennantRGoensCBarlowJDayCStewart-BrownSA systematic review of reviews of interventions to promote mental health and prevent mental health problems in children and young peopleJournal of Public Mental Health2007612532
   Google Scholar
• ErnstEA systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathyBr J Clin Pharmacol200254657758212492603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BloomBSEffects of continuing medical education on improving physician clinical care and patient health: a review of systematic reviewsInt J Technol Assess Health CareSummer200521338038516110718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ErnstECanterPHA systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulationJ R Soc Med200699419219616574972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De NietGJTiemensBGKloosMWHutschemaekersGJReview of systematic reviews about the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions to improve sleep quality in insomniaInt J Evid Based Healthc20097423324221631864
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BrouwersMCGarciaKMakarskiJDarazLThe landscape of knowledge translation interventions in cancer control: What do we know and where to next? A review of systematic reviewsImplementation science: IS2011613022185329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RichardsDThe EQUATOR network and websiteEvid Based Dent20078411718158552
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EQUATOR NetworkEnhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research [homepage on the Internet]Oxford, UKEQUATOR Network2011 Available from: http://www.equator-network.org/home/Accessed May 13, 2012
   Google Scholar
• SimeraIAltmanDGMoherDSchulzKFHoeyJGuidelines for reporting health research: the EQUATOR network’s survey of guideline authorsPLoS Med200856e13918578566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONSORTCONSORT Transparent Reporting of Trials [homepage on the Internet] Available from: http://www.consort-statement.org/Accessed May 13, 2012
   Google Scholar
• SchulzKAltmanDMoherDGroup The CONSORT GroupCONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsBMC Medicine2010811820334633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShikataSNakayamaTYamagishiHQuality of surgical randomized controlled trials for acute cholecystitis: assessment based on CONSORT and additional check itemsJ Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg200815329730318535768
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SütNSenocakMUysalOKöksalanHAssessing the quality of randomized controlled trials from two leading cancer journals using the CONSORT statementHematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther200811384320063527
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• UetaniKNakayamaTIkaiHYonemotoNMoherDQuality of reports on randomized controlled trials conducted in Japan: evaluation of adherence to the CONSORT statementIntern Med200948530731319252352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZiogasDCZintzarasEAnalysis of the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in acute and chronic myeloid leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes as governed by the CONSORT statementAnn Epidemiol200919749450019523596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlvarezFMeyerNGourraudPAPaulCCONSORT adoption and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: a systematic analysis in two dermatology journalsBr J Dermatol200916151159116519681881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AreiaMSoaresMDinis-RibeiroMQuality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements?Endoscopy201042213814720140830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DasíFNavarro-GarcíaMMJiménez-HerediaMEvaluation of the quality of publications on randomized clinical trials using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement guidelines in a Spanish tertiary hospitalJ Clin Pharmacol20125271106111421593281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeJDuLLiuGQuality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional Chinese medicine RCTs: a review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviewsTrials20111212221569452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithBALeeHJLeeJHQuality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT)Nurs Outlook2008561313718237622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaddBOMcCradyBSManuelJKCampbellWImproving the quality of reporting alcohol outcome studies: effects of the CONSORT statementAddict Behav201035766066620207490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoherDHopewellSSchulzKFCONSORTCONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsInt J Surg2012101285522036893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NoahNThe STROBE initiative: STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)Epidemiol Infect2008136786518482461
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MoherDCookDJEastwoodSOlkinIRennieDStroupDFImproving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysesLancet199935491931896190010584742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TreasureEThe TREND statementEvid Based Dent200454889115608704
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• StroupDFBerlinJAMortonSCMeta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) groupJAMA2000283152008201210789670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationPLoS Med200967e100010019621070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArkseyHO’MalleyLScoping studies: towards a methodological frameworkInt J Soc Res Methodol2005811932
   Google Scholar
• SmithVDevaneDBegleyCMClarkeMMethodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventionsBMC Med Res Methodol20111111521291558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrienSELorenzettiDLLewisSKennedyJGhaliWAOverview of a formal scoping review on health system report cardsImplement Sci201052220205791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationBMJ2009339b270019622552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontoriVMWilczynskiNLMorganDHaynesRBOptimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical surveyBMJ200533074826815619601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilczynskiNLHaynesRBEMBASE search strategies achieved high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving methodologically sound systematic reviewsJ Clin Epidemiol2007601293317161751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CohenJA coefficient of agreement for nominal scalesEducational and Psychological Measurement196020137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SheaBJHamelCWellsGAAMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsJ Clin Epidemiol200962101013102019230606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SheaBJBouterLMPetersonJExternal validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR)PLoS One2007212e135018159233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SheaBJGrimshawJMWellsGADevelopment of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsBMC Med Res Methodol200771017302989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OxmanADGuyattGHSingerJAgreement among reviewers of review articlesJ Clin Epidemiol199144191981824710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BianZXMoherDDagenaisSImproving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, part IV: applying a revised CONSORT checklist to measure reporting quality. Zhong xi yi jie he xue bao = Journal of Chinese integrative medicine200643233242
   Google Scholar
• AugestadKMBerntsenGLassenKBellikaJGWoottonRLindsetmoROStandards for reporting randomized controlled trials in medical informatics: a systematic review of CONSORT adherence in RCTs on clinical decision supportJ Am Med Inform Assoc2012191132121803926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BalasubramanianSPWienerMAlshameeriZTiruvoipatiRElbourneDReedMWStandards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery: can we do better?Annals of surgery2006244566366717060756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KiehnaENStarkeRMPouratianNDumontASStandards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgeryJ Neurosurg2011114228028521054137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoherDSoekenKSampsonMBen-PoratLBermanBAssessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicineBMC Pediatr20022311914146
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FroudREldridgeSDiaz OrdazKMarinhoVCDonnerAQuality of cluster randomized controlled trials in oral health: a systematic review of reports published between 2005 and 2009Community Dent Oral Epidemiol201240Suppl 131422369703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FungAEPalankiRBakriSJDepperschmidtEGibsonAApplying the CONSORT and STROBE statements to evaluate the reporting quality of neovascular age-related macular degeneration studiesOphthalmology2009116228629619091408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontgomeryAAAstinMPPetersTJReporting of factorial trials of complex interventions in community settings: a systematic reviewTrials20111217921771302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PlintACMoherDMorrisonADoes the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic reviewThe Medical journal of Australia2006185526326716948622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WanggeGKlungelOHRoesKCde BoerAHoesAWKnolMJRoom for improvement in conducting and reporting non-inferiority randomized controlled trials on drugs: a systematic reviewPLoS One2010510e1355021048948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZintzarasEKitsiosGDPapathanasiouAARandomized trials of dopamine agonists in restless legs syndrome: a systematic review, quality assessment, and meta-analysisClin Ther201032222123720206780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-NamankanyAAAshleyPMolesDRParekhSAssessment of the quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in paediatric dentistry journalsInt J Paediatr Dent200919531832419320912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BathFJOwenVEBathPMQuality of full and final publications reporting acute stroke trials: a systematic reviewStroke19982910220322109756604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BerezaBGMachadoMEinarsonTRAssessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disordersAnn Pharmacother200842101402140918728102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BousquetPJCalderonMADemolyPThe Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement applied to allergen-specific immunotherapy with inhalant allergens: a Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN) articleThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology20111271495656e41e1121112079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CapiliBAnastasiJKGeigerJNAdverse event reporting in acupuncture clinical trials focusing on painClin J Pain2010261434820026952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CavadasVBrancoFCarvalhoFLOsorioLGomesMJSilva-RamosMThe quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in pelvic organ prolapseInt Urogynecol J20112291117112521484364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChowersMYGottesmanBSLeiboviciLPielmeierUAndreassenSPaulMReporting of adverse events in randomized controlled trials of highly active antiretroviral therapy: systematic reviewAntimicrob Chemother2009642239250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CookDALevinsonAJGarsideSMethod and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic reviewMed Educ201145322723821299598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de VriesTWvan RoonENLow quality of reporting adverse drug reactions in paediatric randomised controlled trialsArch Dis Child201095121023102620551194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EthgenMBoutronLStegPGRoyCRavaudPQuality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary interventionBMC Med Res Methodol200992419358717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EyawoOLeeCWRachlisBMillsEJReporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials for major prostaglandins: a systematic survey of the ophthalmology literatureTrials200896919055743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FarrokhyarFChuRWhitlockRThabaneLA systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trialsCan J Surg200750426627717897515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GagnierJJDeMeloJBoonHRochonPBombardierCQuality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of herbal medicine interventionsAm J Med20061199800e801e81116945616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HalpernSHDaraniRDouglasMJWightWYeeJCompliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trialsInt J Obstet Anesth200413420721415477048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HemelsMEVicenteCSadriHMassonMJEinarsonTRQuality assessment of meta-analyses of RCTs of pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorderCurr Med Res Opin200420447748415119985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HerdanARothRGrassDImprovement of quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials to prevent hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean sectionGynecol Surg20118212112721654900
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JunhuaZHongcaiSXiumeiGMethodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta–analysis of traditional Chinese medicineJ Evid Based Complementary Altern Med2007138797805
   Google Scholar
• KoberTTrelleSEngertAReporting of randomized controlled trials in Hodgkin lymphoma in biomedical journalsJ Natl Cancer Inst200698962062516670387
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LiJYZhangYFSmithGSQuality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in tai chi interventions-a systematic reviewEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine2011201138324519351709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuLZengJChenYQuality of reporting in randomized controlled trials conducted in China on the treatment of cancer painExpert Rev Anticancer Ther201111687187721707284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaBGuoJQiGEpidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journalsPLoS One201165e2018521633698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarshmanZFaridFThe quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in dental public healthCommunity dental health201027425325621473363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberg-MogrenENelsonDLEvaluating the quality of reporting occupational therapy randomized controlled trials by expanding the CONSORT criteriaAm J Occup Ther200660222623516596926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontaneEVallanoAVidalXAguileraCLaporteJRReporting randomised clinical trials of analgesics after traumatic or orthopaedic surgery is inadequate: a systematic reviewBMC Clin Pharmol2010102
   Google Scholar
• Norton-MabusJCNelsonDLReporting of randomized controlled trials in occupational therapy and speech therapy: evaluation using an expansion of the CONSORT statementOTJR (Thorofare N J)20082826471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParsonsNRHiskensRPriceCLAchtenJCostaMLA systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journalsJ Bone Joint Surg Br20119391154115921911523
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PiggottMMcGeeHFeuerDHas CONSORT improved the reporting of randomized controlled trials in the palliative care literature? A systematic reviewPalliat Med2004181323814982205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RiosLPOdueyungboAMoitriMORahmanMOThabaneLQuality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literatureJ Clin Endocrinol Metab200893103810381618583463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SheaBBouterLMGrimshawJMScope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal GroupJ Rheumatol200633191516267878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StrechDSoltmannBWeikertBBauerMPfennigAQuality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic reviewJ Clin Psychiatry20117291214122121294992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThabaneLChuRCuddyKDouketisJWhat is the quality of reporting in weight loss intervention studies? A systematic review of randomized controlled trialsInt J Obes (Lond)200731101554155917452988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigna-TagliantiFVineisPLiberatiAFaggianoFQuality of systematic reviews used in guidelines for oncology practiceAnn Oncol200617469170116461333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WalleserSHillSRBeroLACharacteristics and quality of reporting of cluster randomized trials in children: reporting needs improvementJ Clin Epidemiol201164121331134021775103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeirCRStaggersNLaukertTReviewing the impact of computerized provider order entry on clinical outcomes: The quality of systematic reviewsInt J Med Inform201281421923122342868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WillisBHQuigleyMThe assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic reviewBMC Med Res Methodol20111116322151233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhongYZWeiJiangHongliFan Taoet al. Quality of reporting of two-group parallel randomized controlled clinical trials of multi-herb formulae: A survey of reports indexed in the Science Citation Index ExpandedEur J Integr Med201134E303E310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZiogasDCZ EAnalysis of the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in acute and chronic myeloid leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes as governed by the CONSORT statementAnn Epidemiol200919749450019523596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimeraIMoherDHirstAHoeyJSchulzKFAltmanDGTransparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR NetworkBMC Medicine201082420420659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PradySLRichmondSJMortonVMMacphersonHA systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trialsPLoS One200832e157718270568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmidtNRutjesAWvan der WindtDAThe quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?Neurology200667579279716966539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoherDSchulzKFSimeraIAltmanDGGuidance for developers of health research reporting guidelinesPLoS medicine2201072e100021720169112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GellerSAdamsMCarnesMAdherence to federal guidelines for reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trialsJ Womens Health (Larchmt)200615101123113117199453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuyattGHHaynesRBJaeschkeRZUsers’ Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users’ Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA2000284101290129610979117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AleissaSParsonsDGrantJHarderJHowardJDeep wound infection following pediatric scoliosis surgery: incidence and analysis of risk factorsCan J Surg201154426326921658334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar