The Translation, Culture-Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale Among Chinese Older Population

References

• Yang G, Wang Y, Zeng Y, et al. Rapid health transition in China, 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013;381(9882):1987–2015. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61097-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu S-S; The Writing Committee. Report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2021: an updated summary. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2023;20(6):399–430. doi:10.26599/1671-5411.2023.06.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The L. Population ageing in China: crisis or opportunity? Lancet. 2022;400(10366):1821. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02410-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulmala J, Nykänen I, Hartikainen S. Frailty as a predictor of all-cause mortality in older men and women. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014;14(4):899–905. doi:10.1111/ggi.12190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidu SS, Baran DA, Jentzer JC, et al. SCAI SHOCK stage classification expert consensus update: a review and incorporation of validation studies: this statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021. J Am Coll of Cardiol. 2022;79(9):933–946. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.018
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ambrosetti M, Abreu A, Corrà U, et al. Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. A position paper from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28(5):460–495. doi:10.1177/2047487320913379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark RA, Conway A, Poulsen V, Keech W, Tirimacco R, Tideman P. Alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22(1):35–74. doi:10.1177/2047487313501093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong MS, Sit JWH, Choi KC, Suhaimi A, Chair SY. Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation and patient perceptions on the usage of technologies in cardiac rehabilitation: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2023. doi:10.1111/jocn.16919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubeck L, Freedman SB, Clark AM, Briffa T, Bauman A, Redfern J. Participating in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(3):494–503. doi:10.1177/1741826711409326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanmugasegaram S, Gagliese L, Oh P, et al. Psychometric validation of the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale. Clin rehabilitat. 2012;26(2):152–164. doi:10.1177/0269215511410579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghisi GL, dos Santos RZ, Aranha EE, et al. Perceptions of barriers to cardiac rehabilitation use in Brazil. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:485–491. doi:10.2147/VHRM.S48213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grace SL, Gravely-Witte S, Kayaniyil S, Brual J, Suskin N, Stewart DE. A multisite examination of sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers by participation status. J Women’s Health. 2009;18(2):209–216. doi:10.1089/jwh.2007.0753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Fowokan A, Grace SL, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Chinese/Mandarin Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-C/M). Rehabil Res Pract. 2021;2021:5511426. doi:10.1155/2021/5511426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):913–923. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00082-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deyk K, Pelgrims E, Troost E, et al. Adolescents’ understanding of their congenital heart disease on transfer to adult-focused care. Am j Cardiol. 2010;106(12):1803–1807. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenheim ME, Moraes CL. Michael Eduardo ReichenheimClaudia Leite Moraes [Operationalizing the cross-cultural adaptation of epidemiological measurement instruments]. Revista de saude publica. 2007;41(4):665–673. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/S0034-89102006005000035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268–274. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang H. 구성타당도 평가에 있어서 요인분석의 활용 [A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity]. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013;43(5):587–594. Korean. doi:10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–497. doi:10.1002/nur.20147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res Social Administrative Pharm. 2019;15(2):214–221. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–467. doi:10.1002/nur.20199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Sun L, Sun Y, Dong Y, Wang A. A conceptual model of home-based cardiac rehabilitation exercise adherence in patients with chronic heart failure: a constructivist grounded theory study. Patient Preference Adherence. 2023;17:851–860. doi:10.2147/PPA.S404287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res. 1966;1(2):245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger JH. Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivar Behav Res. 1990;25(2):173–180. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Ding H, Wang Z, et al. Translation, cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity testing of a Chinese version of the self-administered Mediterranean diet scale. Front Nutr. 2022;9:831109. doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.831109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000;30(1):1–15. doi:10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hil; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Ghisi GLM, Xu Z, Liu X, et al. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rehabilitation delivery around the world. Global Heart. 2021;16(1):43. doi:10.5334/gh.939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai LS, Siop S, Putit Z, Lim L, Gunggu A, Tie SF. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Malay version of the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale. J Res Nurs. 2020;28(1):e64. doi:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanbari-Firoozabadi M, Mirzaei M, Vafaii Nasab M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Persian version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-P). BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e034552. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniou V, Pasias K, Loukidis N, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Greek Version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-GR): what are the barriers in South-East Europe? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(5):5. doi:10.3390/ijerph20054064
   Google Scholar
• Kenis-Coskun O, Göçmen S, Sağdıç B. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of “cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale”. Gul Med J. 2019;61(2):59. doi:10.26657/gulhane.00055
   Google Scholar
• Ghisi GL, Santos RZ, Schveitzer V, et al. Development and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale. Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia. 2012;98(4):344–351. doi:10.1590/S0066-782X2012005000025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek S, Park HW, Lee Y, Grace SL, Kim WS. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Korean-Language Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-K). Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(5):858–867. doi:10.5535/arm.2017.41.5.858
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsui CK, Shanmugasegaram S, Jamnik V, Wu G, Grace SL. Variation in patient perceptions of healthcare provider endorsement of cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012;32(4):192–197. doi:10.1097/HCR.0b013e318255a39d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ades PA, Waldmann ML, McCann WJ, Weaver SO. Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation participation in older coronary patients. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(5):1033–1035. doi:10.1001/archinte.1992.00400170113021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar