Integrated Electronic Health Record of Multidisciplinary Professionals Throughout the Cancer Care Pathway: A Pilot Study Exploring Patient-Centered Information in Breast Cancer Patients

References

• Cancer Research UK. Treatment options for breast cancer. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/breast-cancer/treatment/treatment-decisions. Accessed December 16, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al.; Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2087–2106 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris AD, Morris RD, Wilson JF, et al. Breast-conserving therapy vs mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 10-year survival. Cancer J Sci Am. 1997;3(1):6–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):15–23. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729cde
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Tourneau C, Delord JP, Gonçalves A, et al. SHIVA investigators. Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled Phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(13):1324–1334. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00188-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):780–781. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1109283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes-Carballo M, Muñoz-Núñez I, Martín-Díaz M, et al. Shared decision making in breast cancer treatment guidelines: development of a quality assessment tool and a systematic review. Health Expect. 2020;23(5):1045–1064. doi:10.1111/hex.13112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Montori VM, Del Mar C. The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. JAMA. 2014;312(13):1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Street RL. Shared mind: communication, decision making, and autonomy in serious illness. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(5):454–461. doi:10.1370/afm.1301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. Physicians’ and patients’ choices in evidence based practice. BMJ. 2002;324(7350):1350. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7350.1350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of Breast Surgery at Baso 2009. Surgical guidelines for the management of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(Suppl 1):1–22. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2009.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Saini KS, Taylor C, Ramirez AJ, et al. Role of the multidisciplinary team in breast cancer management: results from a large international survey involving 39 countries. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):853–859. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patkar V, Acosta D, Davidson T, et al. Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011;2011:831605. doi:10.4061/2011/831605
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(2):100–103. doi:10.1370/afm.1239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Fiscella K, Lesser CS, et al. Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Aff. 2010;29(8):1489–1495. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras JM, Albreht T, Audisio R, et al. Policy statement on multidisciplinary cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(3):475–480. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCO and ESMO. ASCO-ESMO consensus statement on quality cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(21):3498–3499. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selby P, Popescu R, Lawler M, Butcher H, Costa A. The value and future developments of multidisciplinary team cancer care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019;39(39):332–340. doi:10.1200/EDBK_236857
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamb BW, Taylor C, Lamb JN, et al. Facilitators and barriers to teamworking and patient centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer teams: findings from a national study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1408–1416. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2676-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, et al. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(8):2116–2125. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazeby JM, Wilson L, Metcalfe C, et al. Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(3):457–460. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdj102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollunder S, Herrlinger U, Zipfel M, et al. Cross-sectional increase of adherence to multidisciplinary tumor board decisions. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):936. doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4841-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukup T, Lamb BW, Sarkar S, et al. Predictors of treatment decisions in multidisciplinary oncology meetings: a quantitative observational study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(13):4410–4417. doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5347-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerts PAF, van der Weijden T, Savelberg W, et al. The next step toward patient-centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: an interview study with professionals. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:1311–1324. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S286044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandamihardja TAK, Soukup T, McInerney S, Green JSA, Sevdalis N. Analysing breast cancer multidisciplinary patient management: a prospective observational evaluation of team clinical decision-making. World J Surg. 2019;43(2):559–566. doi:10.1007/s00268-018-4815-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahlweg P, Hoffmann J, Härter M, et al. In Absentia: an exploratory study of how patients are considered in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139921. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlait M, Baes S, Dhaene S, et al. How multidisciplinary are multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care? An observational study in oncology departments in Flanders. Belgium J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019;12:159–167. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S196660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wihl J, Rosell L, Frederiksen K, et al. Contributions to multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care: predictors of complete case information and comprehensive case discussions. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:2445–2452. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S309162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butow P, Harrison JD, Choy ET, Young JM, Spillane A, Evans A, Choy ET et al.Health professional and consumer views on involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan. Cancer. 2007;110(9):1937–1944. doi:10.1002/cncr.23007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann A, Heuser C, Ernstmann N, et al. How do breast cancer patients experience multidisciplinary tumor conferences? - A description from the patient perspective. Breast. 2019;44:66–72. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2018.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuser C, Diekmann A, Schellenberger B, et al. Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences from the providers’ perspective: is it feasible in routine cancer care? J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:1729–1739. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S283166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellenberger B, Heuser C, Diekmann A, et al. Questions and emotional expressions from patients and companions while participating in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in breast and gynecological cancer centers. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(7):2058–2066. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayama T, Inoue Y, Toh Y, et al. New approach for collecting cancer patients’ views and preferences through medical staff. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021;15:375–385. doi:10.2147/PPA.S292239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varpio L, Day K, Elliot-Miller P, et al. The impact of adopting EHRs: how losing connectivity affects clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2015;49(5):476–486. doi:10.1111/medu.12665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senteio C, Veinot T, Adler-Milstein J, Richardson C. Physicians’ perceptions of the impact of the EHR on the collection and retrieval of psychosocial information in outpatient diabetes care. Int J Med Inform. 2018;113:9–16. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–349. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis RE. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Sage Publications, Inc; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree BF, Miller WF. A template approach to text analysis: developing and using codebooks. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editors. Doing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Inc; 1992:93–109.
   Google Scholar
• Horlait M, De Regge M, Baes S, Eeckloo K, Leys M. Exploring non-physician care professionals’ roles in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0263611. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levit L, Balogh E, Nass S, et al.; Committee on Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: Addressing the Challenges of an Aging Population; Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013. PMID: 24872984.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine, 7e (LANGE Clinical Science). McGraw-Hill Medical; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Morita T, Miyashita M, Yamagishi A, et al. A region-based palliative care intervention trial using the mixed-method approach: japan OPTIM study. BMC Palliat Care. 2012;11(1):2. doi:10.1186/1472-684X-11-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okuyama TA, Kizawa Y. [National survey on the current state of palliative care. National Trend] Kanwa kea no genjo ni kansuru zenkokujittaichosa, zenkoku no doko (in Japanese). [Case studies on palliative care screening] Kanwa kea sukuriiningu ni kansuru jirei shuu (in Japanese); 2016:p.4–15. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-10900000-Kenkoukyoku/0000122400.pdf. Accessed May 5, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Cancer Center S, The Views of 1275 people who faced up to breast cancer (Article in Japanese). Available from: https://www.scchr.jp/book/houkokusho/2013nyugan.html. Accessed October 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Klie JC, Bugert M, Boullosa B, Eckart de Castilho R, Gurevych I. The INCEpTION Platform: machine Assisted and Knowledge-Oriented Interactive Annotation. In Proceedings of the 27th International 2018. Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations; 2018:5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Langberg EM, Dyhr L, Davidsen AS. Development of the concept of patient-centredness - A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(7):1228–1236. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover S, Fitzpatrick A, Azim FT, et al. Defining and implementing patient-centered care: an umbrella review. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(7):1679–1688. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen A, Robinson T, Brunner M, et al. Multidisciplinary teams and ICT: a qualitative study exploring the use of technology and its impact on multidisciplinary team meetings. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):444. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3242-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vos JFJ, Boonstra A, Kooistra A, et al. The influence of electronic health record use on collaboration among medical specialties. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):676. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05542-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoumpos AI, Kitsios F, Talias MA. Digital transformation in healthcare: technology acceptance and its applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3407. doi:10.3390/ijerph20043407
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamprell K, Arnolda G, Delaney GP, et al. The challenge of putting principles into practice: resource tensions and real-world constraints in multidisciplinary oncology team meetings. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019;15(4):199–207. doi:10.1111/ajco.13166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brom L, De Snoo-Trimp JC, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, et al. Challenges in shared decision making in advanced cancer care: a qualitative longitudinal observational and interview study. Health Expect. 2017;20(1):69–84. doi:10.1111/hex.12434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane HL, Halpern MT, Squiers LB, et al. Implementing and evaluating shared decision making in oncology practice. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(6):377–388. doi:10.3322/caac.21245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kočo L, Siebers CCN, Schlooz M, et al. Mapping current organizational structure and improvement points of breast cancer multidisciplinary team meetings - An interview study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:2421–2430. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S380293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee PY, Chang TR. Application of integrative information system improves the quality and effectiveness of cancer case management. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:287–290. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S77714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar