The Application of ChatGPT in Medicine: A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis

References

• Wu T, He S, Liu J, et al. A brief overview of ChatGPT: the history, status quo and potential future development. IEEECAA J Autom Sin. 2023;10(5):1122–1136. doi:10.1109/JAS.2023.123618
   Google Scholar
• Currie GM. Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy? Semin Nucl Med. 2023;53(5):719–730. doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhayana R, Krishna S, Bleakney RR. Performance of ChatGPT on a radiology board-style examination: insights into current strengths and limitations. Radiology. 2023;307(5). doi:10.1148/radiol.230582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng TL, Wang YM, Chang S, Chen TJ, Wang SJ. ChatGPT failed Taiwan’s Family Medicine Board Exam. J Chin Med Assoc. 2023;86(8):762–766. doi:10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevgi UT, Erol G, Dogruel Y, Sonmez OF, Tubbs RS, Gungor A. The role of an open artificial intelligence platform in modern neurosurgical education: a preliminary study. Neurosurg Rev. 2023;46(1):86. doi:10.1007/s10143-023-01998-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SW, Kemp MW, Logan SJS, et al. ChatGPT outscored human candidates in a virtual objective structured clinical examination in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;229(2):172.e1–172.e12. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth I, Cox A, Xie Y, et al. Evaluating chatbot efficacy for answering frequently asked questions in plastic surgery: a ChatGPT case study focused on breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2023;43(10):1126–1135. doi:10.1093/asj/sjad140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Ma X, Zhang Y, Su B, Liu P. GPT4: the indispensable helper for neurosurgeons in the new era. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51(10):2113–2115. doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03241-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay D, Kumar B, Bellamy D, et al. Assessment of ChatGPT success with specialty medical knowledge using anaesthesiology board examination practice questions. Br J Anaesth. 2023;131(2):e31–e34. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2023.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentín-Bravo FJ, Mateos-álvarez E, Usategui-Martín R, Andrés-Iglesias C, Pastor-Jimeno JC, Pastor-Idoate S. Artificial Intelligence and new language models in Ophthalmology: complications of the use of silicone oil in vitreoretinal surgery. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol Engl Ed. 2023;98(5):298–303. doi:10.1016/j.oftale.2023.04.011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xie Y, Seth I, Rozen WM, Hunter-Smith DJ. Evaluation of the artificial intelligence chatbot on breast reconstruction and its efficacy in surgical research: a case study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(6):2360–2369. doi:10.1007/s00266-023-03443-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın Ö, Karaarslan E. OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: digital twin in healthcare. SSRN J. 2022. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4308687
   Google Scholar
• Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Health Care. 2023;11(6):887. doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887
   Google Scholar
• Gödde D, Breuckmann F, Sellmann T. A SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis of ChatGPT in the medical literature: concise review. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e49368. doi:10.2196/49368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson J, Pearce PF, Ferguson LA, Langford CA. Understanding scoping reviews: definition, purpose, and process. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017;29(1):12–16. doi:10.1002/2327-6924.12380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;20(5):69. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   Google Scholar
• Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;19(1):143. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   Google Scholar
• Ninkov A, Frank JR, Maggio LA. Bibliometrics: methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2022;11(3):173–176. doi:10.1007/S40037-021-00695-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Navas-Martín MÁ, Ovalle-Perandones MA, López-Bueno JA, Díaz J, Linares C, Sánchez-Martínez G. Population adaptation to heat as seen through the temperature-mortality relationship, in the context of the impact of global warming on health: a scoping review. Sci Total Environ. 2024;908:168441. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraga-Graells E, Povedano-Montero FJ, Alvarez-Peregrina C, Villa-Collar C, Arance-Gil A, Sánchez-Tena MA. Bibliometric study of refractive surgery and dry eye scientific literature. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol Engl Ed. 2022;97(6):323–330. doi:10.1016/j.oftale.2022.02.011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang C, Liu S, Yang H, Guo J, Wu Y, Liu J. Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e48009. doi:10.2196/48009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World health statistics 2023; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240074323. Accessed April 2, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Castro H. ChatGPT-4: dermatology aid in the emergency room. Dermatol Heidelb. 2023;74(8):633–634. doi:10.1007/s00105-023-05186-7
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Liu L, Ruan S, Li M, Yin C. Are different versions of ChatGPT’s ability comparable to the clinical diagnosis presented in case reports? A descriptive study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023;16:3825–3831. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S441790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Wright AP, Patterson BL, et al. Using AI-generated suggestions from ChatGPT to optimize clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023;30(7):1237–1245. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosbach WA, Senge JF, Nemeth B. Ability of ChatGPT to generate competent radiology reports for distal radius fracture by use of RSNA template items and integrated AO classifier. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2024;53(1):102–110. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesa-Estomba CM, Lechien JR, Vaira LA. Exploring the potential of Chat-GPT as a supportive tool for sialendoscopy clinical decision making and patient information support. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. doi:10.1007/s00405-023-08104-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanzi TM. Impact of ChatGPT on teleconsultants in healthcare: perceptions of healthcare experts in Saudi Arabia. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023;16:2309–2321. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S419847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koga S, Martin NB, Dickson DW. Evaluating the performance of large language models: chatGPT and Google Bard in generating differential diagnoses in clinicopathological conferences of neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Pathol. 2023;e13207. doi:10.1111/bpa.13207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya M, Miller VM, Bhattacharyya D, Miller LE. High rates of fabricated and inaccurate references in ChatGPT-generated medical content. Cureus. 2023. doi:10.7759/cureus.39238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaabi M, Hariri W, Smaoui N. A review study of ChatGPT applications in education; 2023. doi:10.1109/INISTA59065.2023.10310439
   Google Scholar
• Wong RSY, Ming LC, Hons B, Affendi R, Ali R. The intersection of ChatGPT, clinical medicine, and medical education. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e47274. doi:10.2196/47274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruksakulpiwat S, Kumar A, Ajibade A. Using ChatGPT in medical research: current status and future directions. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023;16:1513–1520. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S413470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas S. ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiology. 2023;307(2):e223312. doi:10.1148/radiol.223312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp HH. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Am Assoc Adv Sci. 2023;379(6630):313. doi:10.1126/science.adg7879
   Google Scholar
• Haman M, Školník M. Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review. Acc Res. 2023;6:1–3. doi:10.1080/08989621.2023.2185514
   Google Scholar
• Eysenbach G. The role of ChatGPT, generative language models, and artificial intelligence in medical education: a conversation with ChatGPT and a call for papers. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e46885. doi:10.2196/46885
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perera Molligoda Arachchige AS, Stomeo N. Controversies surrounding AI-based reporting systems in echocardiography. J Echocardiogr. 2023;21(4):184–185. doi:10.1007/s12574-023-00620-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar