Global Trends in Orthopedic Biofilm Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of 1994-2022

References

• Lopez CD, Boddapati V, Lombardi JM, et al. Recent trends in medicare utilization and reimbursement for lumbar spine fusion and discectomy procedures. Spine j. 2020;20(10):1586–1594. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng X, Gu J, Zhou Y. Primary total Hip arthroplasty failure: aseptic loosening remains the most common cause of revision. Am J Transl Res. 2022;14(10):7080–7089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro M, Monteiro FJ, Ferraz MP. Infection of orthopedic implants with emphasis on bacterial adhesion process and techniques used in studying bacterial-material interactions. Biomatter. 2012;2(4):176–194. doi:10.4161/biom.22905
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karygianni L, Ren Z, Koo H, Thurnheer T. Biofilm matrixome: Extracellular components in structured microbial communities. Trends in Microbiology. 2020;28(8):668–681. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2020.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bircher L, Schwab C, Geirnaert A, Greppi A, Lacroix C, Wilmes P. Planktonic and sessile artificial colonic microbiota harbor distinct composition and reestablish differently upon frozen and freeze-dried long-term storage. mSystems. 2020;5(1):e00521–00519. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00521-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestby LK, Grønseth T, Simm R, Nesse LL. Bacterial biofilm and its role in the pathogenesis of disease. Antibiotics. 2020;9(2). doi:10.3390/antibiotics9020059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatoon Z, McTiernan CD, Suuronen EJ, Mah TF, Alarcon EI. Bacterial biofilm formation on implantable devices and approaches to its treatment and prevention. Heliyon. 2018;4(12):e01067. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Zhang R, Chen Z, Cao P, Zhou Q, Wu Q. A global bibliometric and visualized analysis of bacterial biofilm eradication from 2012 to 2022. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1287964. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1287964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J busi rese. 2021;133:285–296. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Tong X, Wang T, et al. Biofilms in wound healing: a bibliometric and visualised study. Int Wound J. 2023;20(2):313–327. doi:10.1111/iwj.13878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim SJ, Muhd Noor ND, Sabri S, Mohamad Ali MS, Salleh AB, Oslan SN. Bibliometric analysis and thematic review of Candida pathogenesis: fundamental omics to applications as potential antifungal drugs and vaccines. Med Mycol. 2024;62(1). doi:10.1093/mmy/myad126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetrics. 2017;11(4):959–975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. J Informetrics. 2011;5(1):146–166. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darouiche RO, Dhir A, Miller AJ, Landon GC, Raad M II, Musher DM. Vancomycin penetration into biofilm covering infected prostheses and effect on bacteria. J Infect Dis. 1994;170(3):720–723. doi:10.1093/infdis/170.3.720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, et al. Sonication of removed Hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. New Engl J Med. 2007;357(7):654–663. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa061588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, Webster TJ. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials. 2010;31(4):706–713. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunney MM, Patrick S, Curran MD, et al. Detection of prosthetic Hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(10):3281–3290. doi:10.1128/JCM.37.10.3281-3290.1999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. New Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1645–1654. doi:10.1056/NEJMra040181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerioli M, Batailler C, Conrad A, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa implant-associated bone and joint infections: Experience in a regional reference center in France. Front Med. 2020;7:513242. doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.513242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kherabi Y, Zeller V, Kerroumi Y, et al. Streptococcal and Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections: are they really different? BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):555. doi:10.1186/s12879-022-07532-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito N, Mur I, Ribera A, et al. The different microbial etiology of prosthetic joint infections according to route of acquisition and time after prosthesis implantation, including the role of multidrug-resistant organisms. J Clin Med. 2019;8(5):673. doi:10.3390/jcm8050673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltiel G, Meyssonnier V, Kerroumi Y, et al. Cutibacterium acnes prosthetic joint infections: Is rifampicin-combination therapy beneficial? Antibiotics. 2022;11(12):1801. doi:10.3390/antibiotics11121801
   Google Scholar
• Zoubos AB, Galanakos SP, Soucacos PN. Orthopedics and biofilm--what do we know? A review. Med scie mon. 2012;18(6):Ra89–96. doi:10.12659/MSM.882893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerli W, Sendi P. Role of rifampin against staphylococcal biofilm infections in vitro, in animal models, and in orthopedic-device-related infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(2). doi:10.1128/AAC.01746-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPlante KL, Woodmansee S. Activities of daptomycin and vancomycin alone and in combination with rifampin and gentamicin against biofilm-forming methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus isolates in an experimental model of endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(9):3880–3886. doi:10.1128/AAC.00134-09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bistolfi A, Massazza G, Verné E, et al. Antibiotic-loaded cement in orthopedic surgery: a review. ISRN Orthopedics. 2011;2011:290851.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bürger J, Akgün D, Strube P, Putzier M, Pumberger M. Sonication of removed implants improves microbiological diagnosis of postoperative spinal infections. European Spine j. 2019;28(4):768–774. doi:10.1007/s00586-019-05881-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pumberger M, Bürger J, Strube P, Akgün D, Putzier M. Unexpected positive cultures in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery using sonication. Bone & Joint j. 2019;101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erivan R, Villatte G, Eymond G, Mulliez A, Descamps S, Boisgard S. Usefulness of sonication for diagnosing infection in explanted orthopaedic implants. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(4):433–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portillo ME, Salvadó M, Trampuz A, et al. Improved diagnosis of orthopedic implant-associated infection by inoculation of sonication fluid into blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(5):1622–1627. doi:10.1128/JCM.03683-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Z. Establishment of a checklist for the identification of patients with postoperative spinal implant infections [dissertation]. Charité: Universitätsmedizin Berlin; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro M, Michiardi A, Castaño O, Planell JA. Biomaterials in orthopaedics. J Royal Soc Interface. 2008;5(27):1137–1158. doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orapiriyakul W, Young PS, Damiati L, Tsimbouri PM. Antibacterial surface modification of titanium implants in orthopaedics. J Tissue Eng. 2018;9:2041731418789838. doi:10.1177/2041731418789838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerachamy S, Yarlagadda T, Manivasagam G, Yarlagadda PK. Bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on medical implants: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2014;228(10):1083–1099. doi:10.1177/0954411914556137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Yang Y, Li R, et al. Enhanced antibacterial properties of orthopedic implants by titanium nanotube surface modification: a review of current techniques. Int j Nanomed. 2019;14:7217–7236. doi:10.2147/IJN.S216175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang N, Ma Y, Shi H, Song Y, Guo S. Mg-, Zn-, and Fe-based alloys with antibacterial properties as orthopedic implant Materials. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:888084. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.888084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn J, McFadden R, Chan C-W, Carson L. Titanium for Orthopedic Applications: An overview of surface modification to improve biocompatibility and prevent bacterial biofilm formation. iScience. 2020;23(11):101745. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarfraz S, Mäntynen PH, Laurila M, et al. Effect of surface tooling techniques of medical titanium implants on bacterial biofilm formation in vitro. Materials. 2022;15(9). doi:10.3390/ma15093228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Salle A, Spagnuolo G, Conte R, Procino A, Peluso G, Rengo C. Effects of various prophylactic procedures on titanium surfaces and biofilm formation. J Period Implant Sci. 2018;48(6):373–382. doi:10.5051/jpis.2018.48.6.373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaugg LK, Astasov-Frauenhoffer M, Braissant O, Hauser-Gerspach I, Waltimo T, Zitzmann NU. Determinants of biofilm formation and cleanability of titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(4):469–475. doi:10.1111/clr.12821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Phillips KS, Gu H, Kazemzadeh-Narbat M, Ren D. How microbes read the map: effects of implant topography on bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. Biomaterials. 2021;268:120595. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radha B, Lim SH, Saifullah MSM, Kulkarni GU. Metal hierarchical patterning by direct nanoimprint lithography. Sci Rep. 2013;3(1):1078. doi:10.1038/srep01078
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alameda MT, Osorio MR, Hernández JJ, Rodríguez I. Multilevel hierarchical topographies by combined photolithography and nanoimprinting processes to create surfaces with controlled wetting. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2019;2(8):4727–4733. doi:10.1021/acsanm.9b00338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francone A, Merino S, Retolaza A, et al. Impact of surface topography on the bacterial attachment to micro- and nano-patterned polymer films. Surf Interfaces. 2021;27:101494. doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akshaya S, Rowlo PK, Dukle A, Nathanael AJ. Antibacterial Coatings for titanium implants: recent trends and future perspectives. Antibiotics. 2022;11(12). doi:10.3390/antibiotics11121719
   Google Scholar
• Tomić SL, Vuković JS. Antimicrobial Activity of Silver, Copper, and Zinc Ions/Poly(Acrylate/Itaconic Acid) Hydrogel Matrices. Inorganics. 2022;10(3):38. doi:10.3390/inorganics10030038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Fu L, Wang J, Shi Z. High dose of vancomycin plus gentamicin incorporated acrylic bone cement decreased the elution of vancomycin. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:2191–2199. doi:10.2147/IDR.S203740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Lu S, Luo W, et al. Efficacy comparison of antibiotic bone cement–coated implants and external fixations for treating infected bone defects. Inter Orthopaedics. 2023;47(5):1171–1179. doi:10.1007/s00264-023-05727-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertazzoni Minelli E, Caveiari C, Benini A. Release of antibiotics from polymethylmethacrylate cement. J Chemotherap. 2002;14(5):492–500. doi:10.1179/joc.2002.14.5.492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duey RE, Chong AC, McQueen DA, et al. Mechanical properties and elution characteristics of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement impregnated with antibiotics for various surface area and volume constructs. Iowa Orthopaedic j. 2012;32:104–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunne NJ, Hill J, McAfee P, Kirkpatrick R, Patrick S, Tunney M. Incorporation of large amounts of gentamicin sulphate into acrylic bone cement: effect on handling and mechanical properties, antibiotic release, and biofilm formation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008;222(3):355–365. doi:10.1243/09544119JEIM355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ince A, Schütze N, Karl N, Löhr JF, Eulert J. Gentamicin negatively influenced osteogenic function in vitro. Int Orthop. 2007;31(2):223–228. doi:10.1007/s00264-006-0144-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzaei R, Campoccia D, Ravaioli S, Arciola CR. Emerging issues and initial insights into bacterial biofilms: from orthopedic infection to metabolomics. Antibiotics. 2024;13(2). doi:10.3390/antibiotics13020184
   Google Scholar
• Mancuso G, Midiri A, Gerace E, Biondo C. Bacterial antibiotic resistance: the most critical pathogens. Pathogens. 2021;10(10):1310. doi:10.3390/pathogens10101310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cangui-Panchi SP, Ñacato-Toapanta AL, Enríquez-Martínez LJ, et al. Battle royale: immune response on biofilms - host-pathogen interactions. Current Res Immun. 2023;4:100057. doi:10.1016/j.crimmu.2023.100057
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mosselhy DA, Assad M, Sironen T, Elbahri M. Nanotheranostics: a Possible Solution for Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and their Biofilms? Nanomaterials. 2021;11(1):82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Z, Pan Y, Yan D, Wang D, Tang BZ. AIEgen-Based nanomaterials for bacterial imaging and antimicrobial applications: recent advances and perspectives. Molecules. 2023;28(6):2863. doi:10.3390/molecules28062863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar