Web-based collaboration in individual care planning challenges the user and the provider roles – toward a power transition in caring relationships

References

• KodnerDLSpreeuwenbergCIntegrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications – a discussion paperInt J Integr Care20022416
   Google Scholar
• BattersbyMHealth-Plus-TeamHealth reform through coordinated care: SA HealthPlusBMJ2005330749266266515775001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarnoKNykänenPOhtonenJSeppäläAKopraKHealthcare Information Exchange in Regional eHealth Networks Implications for Initiatives in Advancing Shared CareInternational Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, eTELEMED ’09Cancun1–7 February 20094245IEEE2009
   Google Scholar
• Sarrami-ForoushaniPTravagliaJDebonoDBraithwaiteJKey concepts in consumer and community engagement: a scoping meta-reviewBMC Health Serv Res201414125024923771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasient-og brukerrettighetslovenPatients’ rights actOslo, Norway1999/2012
   Google Scholar
• Forskrift om habilitering og rehabilitering individuell plan og koordinatorNorwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services, Regulations for Rehabilitation, Individual care plan and CoordinatorOslo, NorwayNorwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services2011
   Google Scholar
• BjerkanJRichterMGrimsmoAHellesøRBrenderJIntegrated care in Norway: the state of affairs years after regulation by lawInt J Integr Care20111118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NormannTSandvinJTThommesenHStultzCGiskeødegårdIKA holistic Approach to RehabilitationOsloKommuneforlaget2004
   Google Scholar
• SSB SNStatistikk ordnet etter emnerStatistics organized by topics2013 Available from: http://www.ssb.no/emner/Accessed February 22, 2013
   Google Scholar
• BjerkanJHedlundMHellesøRPatients’ contribution to the development of a web-based plan for integrated care – a participatory design studyInform Health Social Care2014118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LauFKuziemskyCPriceMGardnerJA review on systematic reviews of health information system studiesJ Am Med Inform Assoc201017663764520962125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BjerkanJAlonsoAPatients and professionals in collaborative testing of a web-based tool for integrated care: an evaluation studyStud Health Technol Inform2010157667120543369
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HansenGVSamarbeid uten fellesskap, om individuell planer i kommunalt psykisk helsearbeidCoordination without Collaboration – About Individual Plans in Municipal Mental Health ServicesPhD ThesisKarlstadUniversity of Karlstad2007
   Google Scholar
• SimonetDThe new public management theory in the British health care system: a critical reviewAdmin Soc2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FreirePPedagogy of the OppressedNew YorkHerder & Herder1970
   Google Scholar
• RappaportJTerms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: toward a theory for community psychologyAm J Community Psychol19871521211483604997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChamberlinJScheneAHA working definition of empowermentPsychiatr Rehabil J1997204346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LewisFMGlanzKRimerBKHealth Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and PracticeSan Francisco, CAJossey-Bass2002
   Google Scholar
• AndersonRMFunnellMMPatient empowerment: myths and misconceptionsPatient Educ Couns201079327728219682830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndersonRMFunnellMMPatient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigmPatient Educ Couns200557215315715911187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StormMEdwardsAModels of user involvement in the mental health context: intentions and implementation challengesPsychiatr Q201384331332723076765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ManneråkSBrandsnesEBrattstrømMFra Bruker til Borger. En strategi for nedbygging av funksjonshemmende barriererFrom patient to citizen. Governmental strategy of reducing disabling barriers in NorwayOlsoDet norske storting, Helsedirektoratet2001
   Google Scholar
• AhgrenBAxelssonREvaluating integrated health care: a model for measurementInt J Integr Care20055e0116773158
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BrattheimBFaxvaagAToussaintPWhen information sharing is not enoughStud Health Technol Inform201116935936321893773
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SchumacherKLMeleisAITransitions: a central concept in nursingImage J Nurs Sch19942621191278063317
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SchmittNRole transition from caregiver to case manager, part 1Lippincotts Case Manag200510629430216317330
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SchmittNRole transition from caregiver to case manager – part IIProf Case Manag20061113746
   Google Scholar
• HoltIGSRole transition in primary care settingsQual Prim Care200816211712618700089
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GuirguisLMChewningBARole theory: literature review and implications for patient–pharmacist interactionsRes Social Adm Pharm20051448350717138492
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WorleyMMSchommerJCBrownLMPharmacists’ and patients’ roles in the pharmacist–patient relationship: are pharmacists and patients reading from the same relationship script?Res Social Adm Pharm200731476917350557
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FreemanT‘Best practice’ in focus group research: making sense of different viewsJ Adv Nurs200656549149717078825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KruegerRAFocus Groups A Practical Guide for Applied ResearchLos Angeles, CA, USASage2009
   Google Scholar
• BrinkmannSKvaleSInterviews – Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research InterviewingLos Angeles, CA, USASage2009
   Google Scholar
• DaleAMasonJUnderstanding Social Research: Thinking Creatively about MethodLos Angeles, CASage Publications2010
   Google Scholar
• MalterudKSystematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysisScand J Public Health201240879580523221918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenhalghTChronic illness: beyond the expert patientBMJ20093387695629631
   Google Scholar
• HeldalFTjoraAMaking sense of patient expertiseSocial Theory Health200971119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambøll Management for HelsedirektoratetKartlegging av individuelle planer i landets kommunerSurvey of Individual Care Plans in NorwayOsloHelsedirektoratet2011 Available from: http://helse-direktoratet.no/helse-og-omsorgstjenester/habilitering-rehabilitering/individuell-plan/Documents/kartlegging-av-individuelle-planer-i-landets-kommuner.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ColomboCMojaLGonzalez-LorenzoMLiberatiAMosconiPPatient empowerment as a component of health system reforms: rights, benefits and vested interestsIntern Emerg Med20127218318722278387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllisterMDunnGPayneKDaviesLToddCPatient empowerment: the need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditionsBMC Health Serv Res201212115722694747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HughesJJOrganization and Information at the Bed-Side: The Experience of the Medical Division of Labor by University Hospitals’ Inpatients [dissertation]ChicagoUniversity of Chicago, Department of Sociology1995
   Google Scholar
• HumerfeltKBrukermedvirkning i arbeid med individuell plan, -anerkjennelse og krenkelseUser Participation in the Work of Individual Care Plan, -Acknowledgment and OffenseTrondheimFaculty of Social Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology2012
   Google Scholar
• McKinlayJBWho is really ignorant – physician or patient?J Health Soc Behav19751613111184936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MalterudKThesenJWhen the helper humiliates the patient: a qualitative study about unintended intimidationsScand J Public Health2008361929818426789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TritterJQMcCallumAThe snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond ArnsteinHealth Policy200676215616816006004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TritterJQRevolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist worldHealth Expect200912327528719754691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChristensenMHewitt-TaylorJEmpowerment in nursing: paternalism or maternalism?Br J Nurs2006151369569916926716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZomorodiMFoleyBJThe nature of advocacy vs. paternalism in nursing: clarifying the ‘thin line’J Adv Nurs20096581746175219493141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OremDETaylorSGReflections on nursing practice science: the nature, the structure, and the foundation of nursing sciencesNurs Sci Q2011241354121220574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGillivaryHNelsonGPartnership in mental health: what it is and how to do itCan J Rehabil19981227183
   Google Scholar
• RushBMental health service user involvement in England: lessons from historyJ Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs200411331331815149379
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BrownDMcWilliamCWard-GriffinCClient-centred empowering partnering in nursingJ Adv Nurs200653216016816422714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MichaelsenRVatneSHollingenAKoordinatorrollen ved Indviduell plan – fokus på brukermedvirkning og samarbeidThe role of coordinator in an Individual Plan – focusing patient participance and cooperationNorsk Tidsskrift for sykepleieforskning2007491528
   Google Scholar
• DanielLEVulnerability as a key to authenticityImage1998302191192
   Google Scholar
• HolumLC“Individual plan” in a user-oriented and empowering perspective: a qualitative study of “individual plans” in Norwegian mental health servicesNord Psychol20126414557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HolumLC“It is a good idea, but.” A qualitative study of implementation of ‘Individual Plan’ in Norwegian mental health careInt J Integr Care20121230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar