Improving outcomes in lung cancer: the value of the multidisciplinary health care team

References

• Australian Institute of Health and WelfareLung Cancer in Australia: An OverviewCanberraAIHW2011
   Google Scholar
• US Cancer Statistics Working GroupUnited States Cancer Statistics (USCS): 1999–2012 incidence and mortality web-based report Available from: https://nccd.cdc.gov/uscsAccessed December 17, 2015
   Google Scholar
• Cancer Research UKLung cancer statistics2012 Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/lung-cancerAccessed September 3, 2015
   Google Scholar
• World Health OrganizationCancer: fact sheet 297 Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/enAccessed December 17, 2015
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and WelfareCancer Survival and Prevalence in Australia: Period Estimates from 1982 to 2010CanberraAIHW2012
   Google Scholar
• HortonRGBD 2010: understanding disease, injury, and riskLancet20123802053205423245595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BydderSNowakAMarionKPhillipsMAtunRThe impact of case discussion at a multidisciplinary team meeting on the treatment of survival of patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancerIntern Med J20093983884120233244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FleissigAJenkinsVCattSFallowfieldLMultidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK?Lancet Oncol2006793594317081919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancer AustraliaAll about multidisciplinary care Available from: http://canceraustralia.gov.au/clinical-best-practice/multidisciplinary-care/all-about-multidisciplinary-careAccessed December 17, 2015
   Google Scholar
• ForrestLMcMillanDMcArdleCDunlopDAn evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary team, in a single centre, on treatment and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancerBr J Cancer20059397797816234818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambBBrownKNagpalKVincentCGreenJSevdalisNQuality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic reviewAnn Surg Oncol2011182116212521442345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GouveiaJColemanMHawardRImproving cancer control in the European Union: conclusions from the Lisbon round-table under the Portuguese EU presidency, 2007Eur J Cancer2008441457146218325756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of SurgeonsCancer Program Standards: Ensuring Patient-Centered CareChicagoACS2006
   Google Scholar
• Commission on CancerCancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centred Care Version 1.0ChicagoAmerican College of Surgeons2011
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceLung Cancer in AdultsLondonNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence2012
   Google Scholar
• National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkNCCN guidelines: non-small-cell lung cancer Available from: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.aspAccessed September 3, 2015
   Google Scholar
• SalomaaESällinenSHiekkanenHLiippoKDelays in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancerChest20051282282228816236885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaqueNRazaAMcGoeyRBoulmayBDiethelmLKantrowSSmall cell lung cancer: time to diagnosis and treatmentSouth Med J201210541842322864099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DavisonAErautCHaqueATelemedicine for multidisciplinary lung cancer meetingsJ Telemed Telecare20041014014315237512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MitchellPLThursfieldVJBallDLLung cancer in Victoria: are we making progress?Med J Aust201319967467924237097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NavaniNNankivellMLawrenceDRLung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trialLancet Respir Med2015328228925660225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EarleCCOutcomes research in lung cancerJ Natl Cancer Inst Monogr2004567715504920
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GriffinJKochKNelsonJCooleyMPalliative care consultation, quality-of-life measurements, and bereavement for end-of-life care in patients with lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelinesChest2007132404S422S17873182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GriffithCThurnerJUnited Kingdom National Health Sevice, Cancer Services Collaborative “Improvement Partnership”: redesign of cancer services – a national approachEur J Surg Oncol200430Suppl 118615358410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KehlKLLandrumMBKahnKLGraySWChenABKeatingNLTumor board participation among physicians caring for patients with lung or colorectal cancerJ Oncol Pract201511e267e27825922221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Breast Cancer CentreMultidisciplinary Meetings for Cancer Care: A Guide for Health Service ProvidersSydneyNBCC2005
   Google Scholar
• WrightFDe VitoCLangerBHunterAMultidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standardsEur J Cancer2007431002101017329094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Breast and Ovarian Cancer CentreMultidisciplinary Cancer Care in Australia: A National Audit 2006SydneyNBOCC2008
   Google Scholar
• National Lung Cancer Working GroupLung Cancer Multidisciplinary Meeting ToolkitWellingtonMinistry of Health2014
   Google Scholar
• GagaMPowellCSchraufnagelDAn official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: the role of the pulmonologist in the diagnosis and management of lung cancerAm J Respir Crit Care Med201318850350723947517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChangJVinesEBertschHThe impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experienceCancer2001911231123711283921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RuhstallerTRoeHThürlimannBNicollJThe multidisciplinary meeting: an indispensable aid to communication between different specialtiesEur J Cancer2006422459246216934974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ButowPHarrisonJChoyEYoungJSpillaneAEvansAHealth professional and consumer views on involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment planCancer20071101937194417823912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SainsburyRHawardBRiderLJohnstonCRoundCInfluence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancerLancet1995345126512707746056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JunorEHoleDGillisCManagement of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team mattersBr J Cancer1994703633708054286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BirchallMBaileyDKingPEffect of process standard on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of EnglandBr J Cancer2004911477148115467772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StephensMRLewisWGBrewsterAEMultidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancerDis Esophagus20061916417116722993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DavisSDahlbergSMyersMChenASteinhornSHodgkin’s disease in the United States: a comparison of patient characteristics and survival in the Centralized Cancer Patient Data System and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results ProgramJ Natl Cancer Inst1987784714783469461
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MorrisEHawardRAGilthorpeMSCraigsCFormanDThe impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire’s colorectal cancer patientsBr J Cancer20069597998517047646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooryMGkoliaPYangIABowmanRVFongKMSystematic review of multidisciplinary teams in the management of lung cancerLung Cancer200860142118304687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DaviesARDeansDAPenmanIThe multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancerDis Esophagus20061949650317069595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbrahamNSGosseyJTDavilaJAAl-OudatSKramerJKReceipt of recommended therapy by patients with advanced colorectal cancerAm J Gastroenterol20061011320132816771956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NichollsSCullenRO’NeillSHalliganAClinical governance: its origins and its foundationsClin Perform Qual Health Care2000817217811142803
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GabelMHiltonNENathansonSDMultidisciplinary breast cancer clinics: do they work?Cancer199779238023849191526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NewmanEGuestAHelvieMChanges in surgical management resulting from case review at breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor boardCancer20061072346235116998942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeeFOwenTLeathemRDecision making in a multidisciplinary cancer team: does team discussion result in better quality decisions?Med Decis Making20042460261315534341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeatingNLLandrumMBLamontEBBozemanSRShulmanLNMcNeilBJTumor boards and the quality of cancer careJ Natl Cancer Inst2013105211312123274388
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MageeLLarocheCGilliganDClinical trials in lung cancer: evidence that a programmed investigation unit and a multidisciplinary clinic may improve recruitmentClin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)20011331031111554635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TemelJSGreerJAMuzikanskyAEarly palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancerN Engl J Med201036373374220818875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GanzPLeeJSiauJQuality of life assessment: an independent prognostic variable for survival in lung cancerCancer199167313131351710541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PettyJVettoMBeyond doughnuts: tumor board recommendations influence patient careJ Cancer Educ2002179710012092861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WrightFLookhongNUrbackDDavisDMcLeodRGagliardiAMultidisciplinary cancer conferences: identifying opportunities to promote implementationAnn Surg Oncol2009162731273719662458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WalshJHarrisonJDYoungJMButowPNSolomonMJMasyaLWhat are the current barriers to effective cancer care coordination? A qualitative studyBMC Health Serv Res20101013220482884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacaskillEJThrushSWalkerEMDixonJMSurgeons’ views on multidisciplinary breast meetingsEur J Cancer20064290590816516461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KellyMJLloydTDMarshallDGarceaGSuttonCDBeachMA snapshot of MDT working and patient mapping in the UK colorectal cancer centres in 2002Colorectal Dis2003557758114617244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WhelanJMGriffithCDArcherTBreast cancer multi-disciplinary teams in England: much achieved but still more to be doneBreast20061511912216473745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BradleyPJZutshiBNuttingCMAn audit of clinical resources available for the care of head and neck cancer patients in EnglandClin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)20051760460916372485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SidhomMAPoulsenMGroup decisions in oncology: doctors’ perceptions of the legal responsibilities arising from multidisciplinary meetingsJ Med Imaging Radiat Oncol20085228729218477124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar