220
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Ecological Momentary Assessment of Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain: Potential Pathways of Central Sensitization in Adolescents and Young Adults with and without Primary Dysmenorrhea

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 3447-3456 | Published online: 22 Dec 2020

References

  • Iacovides S, Avidon I, Baker FC. What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(6):762–778. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv039
  • Hardi G, Evans S, Craigie M. A possible link between dysmenorrhoea and the development of chronic pelvic pain. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;54(6):593–596. doi:10.1111/ajo.12274
  • Li R, Li B, Kreher DA, Benjamin AR, Gubbels A, Smith SM. Association between dysmenorrhea and chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:350–371. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.002
  • Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011;152(3 Suppl):S2–15. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030
  • Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity. J Pain. 2009;10(9):895–926. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012
  • Stratton P, Khachikyan I, Sinaii N, Ortiz R, Shah J. Association of chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis with signs of sensitization and myofascial pain. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(3):719–728. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000663
  • Aredo JV, Heyrana KJ, Karp BI, Shah JP, Stratton P. Relating chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis to signs of sensitization and myofascial pain and dysfunction. Semin Reprod Med. 2017;35(1):88–97. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1597123
  • Eller-Smith OC, Nicol AL, Christianson JA. Potential mechanisms underlying centralized pain and emerging therapeutic interventions. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:35.
  • Aslam N, Harrison G, Khan K, et al. Visceral hyperalgesia in chronic pelvic pain. BJOG. 2009;116(12):1551–1555. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02305.x
  • Chen T, Mu J, Xue Q, et al. Whole-brain structural magnetic resonance imaging–based classification of primary dysmenorrhea in pain-free phase: a machine learning study. Pain. 2019;160(3):734–741. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001428
  • Liu J, Liu H, Mu J, et al. Altered white matter microarchitecture in the cingulum bundle in women with primary dysmenorrhea: a tract-based analysis study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38(9):4430–4443. doi:10.1002/hbm.23670
  • Wei SY, Chao HT, Tu CH, et al. Changes in functional connectivity of pain modulatory systems in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Pain. 2016;157(1):92–102. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000340
  • Payne LA, Rapkin AJ, Seidman LC, Zeltzer LK, Tsao JC. Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review. J Pain Res. 2017;10:2233–2246. doi:10.2147/JPR.S143512
  • Payne LA, Seidman LC, Sim MS, Rapkin AJ, Naliboff BD, Zeltzer LK. Experimental evaluation of central pain processes in young women with primary dysmenorrhea. Pain. 2019;160(6):1421–1430. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001516
  • Hellman KM, Roth GE, Dillane KE, et al. Dysmenorrhea subtypes exhibit differential quantitative sensory assessment profiles. Pain. 2020;161(6):1227–1236. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001826
  • Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1–32. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415
  • May M, Junghaenel DU, Ono M, Stone AA, Schneider S. Ecological momentary assessment methodology in chronic pain research: a systematic review. J Pain. 2018;19(7):699–716. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.01.006
  • Suveg C, Payne M, Thomassin K, Jacob ML. Electronic diaries: a feasible method of assessing emotional experiences in youth? J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2010;32(1):57–67. doi:10.1007/s10862-009-9162-0
  • Ono M, Schneider S, Junghaenel DU, Stone AA. What affects the completion of ecological momentary assessments in chronic pain research? An individual patient data meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e11398. doi:10.2196/11398
  • Vincent K, Warnaby C, Stagg CJ, Moore J, Kennedy S, Tracey I. Dysmenorrhoea is associated with central changes in otherwise healthy women. Pain. 2011;152(9):1966–1975. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.029
  • Seidman LC, Brennan KM, Rapkin AJ, Payne LA. Rates of anovulation in adolescents and young adults with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea and those without primary dysmenorrhea. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018;31(2):94–101. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2017.09.014
  • Stone AA, Shiffman S. Capturing momentary, self-report data: a proposal for reporting guidelines. Ann Behav Med. 2002;24(3):236–243. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2403_09
  • Wen CKF, Schneider S, Stone AA, Spruijt-Metz D. Compliance with mobile ecological momentary assessment protocols in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(4):e132. doi:10.2196/jmir.6641
  • Breivik EK, Bjornsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain. 2000;16(1):22–28. doi:10.1097/00002508-200003000-00005
  • Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113(1):9–19. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012
  • Castarlenas E, Jensen MP, von Baeyer CL, Miro J. Psychometric properties of the numerical rating scale to assess self-reported pain intensity in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2017;33(4):376–383. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000406
  • von Baeyer CL, Spagrud LJ, McCormick JC, Choo E, Neville K, Connelly MA. Three new datasets supporting use of the numerical rating scale (NRS-11) for children’s self-reports of pain intensity. Pain. 2009;143(3):223–227. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.002
  • Hoenig JM, Heisey DM. The abuse of power: the pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. Am Stat. 2001;55(1):19–24. doi:10.1198/000313001300339897
  • Levine M, Ensom MH. Post hoc power analysis: an idea whose time has passed? Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21(4):405–409. doi:10.1592/phco.21.5.405.34503
  • Liao Y, Skelton K, Dunton G, Bruening M. A systematic review of methods and procedures used in ecological momentary assessments of diet and physical activity research in youth: an adapted STROBE checklist for reporting EMA studies (CREMAS). J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(6):e151. doi:10.2196/jmir.4954
  • Hufford MR, Shields AL. Electronic diaries: applications and what works in the field. Appl Clin Trials. 2002;11(4):46–56.
  • Schnall R, Okoniewski A, Tiase V, Low A, Rodriguez M, Kaplan S. Using text messaging to assess adolescents’ health information needs: an ecological momentary assessment. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(3):e54. doi:10.2196/jmir.2395
  • Pew Research Center. Mobile fact sheet; 2019. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/. Accessed July 10, 2020.
  • Schaeffer K. Most U.S. teens who use cellphones do it to pass time, connect with others, learn new things; 2019. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/23/most-u-s-teens-who-use-cellphones-do-it-to-pass-time-connect-with-others-learn-new-things/. Accessed July 10, 2020.
  • Heimlich R Texting is nearly universal among young adult cell phone owners; 2012; Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2012/12/14/texting-is-nearly-universal-among-young-adult-cell-phone-owners/. Accessed July 10, 2020.
  • Hofmann W, Patel PV. SurveySignal: a convenient solution for experience sampling research using participants’ own smartphones. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2014;33(2):235–253. doi:10.1177/0894439314525117
  • Taylor HS, Giudice LC, Lessey BA, et al. Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with Elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):28–40. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1700089