Reported Outcomes in Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials

References

• Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP classification of chronic pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain. 2019;160(1):19–27. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steingrimsdottir OA, Landmark T, Macfarlane GJ, Nielsen CS. Defining chronic pain in epidemiological studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2017;158(11):2092–2107. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlhamer J, Lucas J, Zelaya C, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(36):1001–1006. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6736a2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosek E, Cohen M, Baron R, et al. Do we need a third mechanistic descriptor for chronic pain states? Pain. 2016;157(7):1382–1386. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IASP. Task force on multimodal pain treatment defines terms for chronic pain care. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP); 2021. Available from: https://www.iasp-pain.org/publications/iaspnews/?ItemNumber=6981. Accessed October 6, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Linton S, Bergbom S. Understanding the link between depression and pain. Scand J Pain. 2011;2(2):47–54. doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.01.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ossipov MH, Dussor GO, Porreca F. Central modulation of pain. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(11):3779–3787. doi:10.1172/JCI43766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatchel R, Peng Y, Peters M, Fuchs P, Turk D. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):581–624. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meints SM, Edwards RR. Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;87(Pt B):168–182. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varallo G, Giusti EM, Scarpina F, Cattivelli R, Capodaglio P, Castelnuovo G. The association of Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing with pain-related disability and pain intensity in obesity and chronic lower-back pain. Brain Sci. 2021;11(1):684. doi:10.3390/brainsci11060684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The World Health Organization (WHO); 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113(1–2):9–19. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi MA, McHugh GA, Closs SJ. Impact of chronic pain on patients’ quality of life: a comparative mixed-methods study. J Patient Exp. 2018;6(2):133–141. doi:10.1177/2374373518786013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ringqvist Å, Dragioti E, Björk M, Larsson B, Gerdle B. Moderate and stable pain reductions as a result of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation-A cohort study from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP). J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):905. doi:10.3390/jcm8060905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scascighini L, Toma V, Dober-Spielmann S, Sprott H. Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Rheumatology. 2008;47(5):670–678. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Council on Health Technology A. SBU systematic review summaries. In: Methods of Treating Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review. Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Council on Health Technology A. SBU systematic review summaries. In: Rehabilitation of Patients with Chronic Pain Conditions: A Systematic Review. Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dragioti E, Björk M, Larsson B, Gerdle B. A meta-epidemiological appraisal of the effects of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy dosing for chronic low back pain. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):871. doi:10.3390/jcm8060871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2477–2481. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1011024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020;161(9):1976–1982. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Revicki D, et al. Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain. 2008;137(2):276–285. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casarett D, Karlawish J, Sankar P, Hirschman K, Asch DA. Designing pain research from the patient’s perspective: what trial end points are important to patients with chronic pain? Pain Med. 2001;2(4):309–316. doi:10.1046/j.1526-4637.2001.01041.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson ME, Brown JL, George SZ, et al. Multidimensional success criteria and expectations for treatment of chronic pain: the patient perspective. Pain Med. 2005;6(5):336–345. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00059.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JL, Edwards PS, Atchison JW, Lafayette-Lucey A, Wittmer VT, Robinson ME. Defining patient-centered, multidimensional success criteria for treatment of chronic spine pain. Pain Med. 2008;9(7):851–862. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00357.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrick D, Sundelin G, Stålnacke BM. One-year follow-up of two different rehabilitation strategies for patients with chronic pain. J Rehabilitat Med. 2012;44(9):764–773. doi:10.2340/16501977-1022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varallo G, Scarpina F, Giusti EM, et al. The role of pain catastrophizing and pain acceptance in performance-based and self-reported physical functioning in individuals with fibromyalgia and obesity. J Pers Med. 2021;11(8):810. doi:10.3390/jpm11080810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckert S, Kaiser U, Kopkow C, Trautmann F, Sabatowski R, Schmitt J. A systematic review of the outcomes reported in multimodal pain therapy for chronic pain. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(1):51–63. doi:10.1002/ejp.721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser U, Kopkow C, Deckert S, et al. Developing a core outcome domain set to assessing effectiveness of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: the VAPAIN consensus statement on core outcome domains. Pain. 2018;159(4):673–683. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, et al. Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2003;106(3):337–345. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S3–s11. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragioti E, Dong HJ, Larsson B, Gerdle B. Reported outcomes in published systematic reviews of interdisciplinary pain treatment: protocol for a systematic overview. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020;9(5):e17795. doi:10.2196/17795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdle B, Molander P, Stenberg G, Stålnacke BM, Enthoven P. Weak outcome predictors of multimodal rehabilitation at one-year follow-up in patients with chronic pain-a practice based evidence study from two SQRP centres. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):490. doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1346-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7(9):e1000326. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):15. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Library of Medicine. Search strategy used to create the pubmed systematic reviews filter. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/pubmed_subsets/sysreviews_strategy.html. accessed Augue
   Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al.Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):CD000963. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000963.pub3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h444. doi:10.1136/bmj.h444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzmán J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C. Multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;1:Cd000963.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz RC, Matthias K, Pieper D, et al. AMSTAR 2 overall confidence rating: lacking discriminating capacity or requirement of high methodological quality? J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;119:142–144. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbers S, Wittink H, Konings S, et al. Longitudinal outcome evaluations of interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment programs for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2021;26(2):310–335. doi:10.1002/ejp.1875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelly AC, Chou R, Dettori JR, et al. AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. In: Noninvasive Nonpharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review Update. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Casey MB, Smart KM, Segurado R, Doody C. Multidisciplinary-based Rehabilitation (MBR) compared with active physical interventions for pain and disability in adults with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2020;36(11):874–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Calderon J, Flores-Cortes M, Morales-Asencio JM, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Luque-Suarez A. Which interventions enhance pain self-efficacy in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, including over 12 000 participants. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020;50(8):418–430. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.9319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou D, Fassoulaki A, Tsoulas C, Siafaka I, Vadalouca A. A meta-analysis to determine the effect of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments on fibromyalgia symptoms comprising OMERACT-10 response criteria. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(3):573–586. doi:10.1007/s10067-015-3144-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Kuijpers T, et al. A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(1):19–39. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1518-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häuser W, Bernardy K, Arnold B, Offenbächer M, Schiltenwolf M. Efficacy of multicomponent treatment in fibromyalgia syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(2):216–224. doi:10.1002/art.24276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlund A, Ropponen A, Alexanderson K. Multidisciplinary interventions: review of studies of return to work after rehabilitation for low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(3):115–121. doi:10.2340/16501977-0297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Calderon J, Flores-Cortes M, Morales-Asencio JM, Luque-Suarez A. Conservative interventions reduce fear in individuals with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(2):329–358. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2019.08.470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Calderon J, Flores-Cortes M, Morales-Asencio JM, Luque-Suarez A. Intervention therapies to reduce pain-related fear in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Pain Med. 2021;22(2):481–498. doi:10.1093/pm/pnaa331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garschagen A, Steegers MA, van Bergen AH, et al. Is there a need for including spiritual care in interdisciplinary rehabilitation of chronic pain patients? Investigating an innovative strategy. Pain Pract. 2015;15(7):671–687. doi:10.1111/papr.12234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterschoot FPC, Dijkstra PU, Hollak N, de Vries HJ, Geertzen JHB, Reneman MF. Dose or content? Effectiveness of pain rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Pain. 2014;155(1):179–189. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2013.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Geen JW, Edelaar MJ, Janssen M, van Eijk JT. The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review. Spine. 2007;32(2):249–255. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000251745.00674.08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielson WR, Weir R. Biopsychosocial approaches to the treatment of chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2001;17(4 Suppl):S114–127. doi:10.1097/00002508-200112001-00020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianola S, Andreano A, Castellini G, Moja L, Valsecchi MG. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: the need to present minimal important differences units in meta-analyses. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):91. doi:10.1186/s12955-018-0924-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane A, Higgins NM, FitzGerald O, et al. Early interventions to promote work participation in people with regional musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(11):1466–1481. doi:10.1177/0269215517699976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry SG, Bell RA, Fenton JJ, Kravitz RL. Goals of chronic pain management: do patients and primary care physicians agree and does it matter? Clin J Pain. 2017;33(11):955–961. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken LM, Zhao-O’Brien J. General psychological acceptance and chronic pain: there is more to accept than the pain itself. Eur J Pain. 2010;14(2):170–175. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson M, McCracken LM. Acceptance and related processes in adjustment to chronic pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011;15(2):144–151. doi:10.1007/s11916-010-0170-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne JC, Sullivan MD. Intensity of chronic pain — the wrong metric? N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2098–2099. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1507136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e66844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guise JM, Butler ME, Chang C, Viswanathan M, Pigott T, Tugwell P. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;90:43–50. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movsisyan A, Melendez-Torres GJ, Montgomery P. A harmonized guidance is needed on how to “properly” frame review questions to make the best use of all available evidence in the assessment of effectiveness of complex interventions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;77:139–141. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murad MH, Almasri J, Alsawas M, Farah W. Grading the quality of evidence in complex interventions: a guide for evidence-based practitioners. Evid Based Med. 2017;22(1):20–22. doi:10.1136/ebmed-2016-110577
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Movsisyan A, Melendez-Torres GJ, Montgomery P. Outcomes in systematic reviews of complex interventions never reached “high” GRADE ratings when compared with those of simple interventions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;78:22–33. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillippo DM, Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Taske N, Ades AE. Threshold analysis as an alternative to GRADE for assessing confidence in guideline recommendations based on network meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(8):538–546. doi:10.7326/M18-3542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323(7303):42–46. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner-Smith EE, Grant S. Meta-Analysis of Complex Interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39(1):135–151. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie D, Fayter D, Petticrew M, et al. The harvest plot: a method for synthesising evidence about the differential effects of interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(1):8. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, López-López JA, Becker BJ, et al. Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(Suppl 1):e000858. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold LM, Williams DA, Hudson JI, et al. Development of responder definitions for fibromyalgia clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(3):885–894. doi:10.1002/art.33360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervoort VM, Vriezekolk JE, van den Ende CH. Development of responder criteria for multicomponent non-pharmacological treatment in fibromyalgia. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35 Suppl 105(3):86–92. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.3629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira-Pinto A, Mauri L. Statistical analysis of noncommensurate multiple outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4(6):650–656. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.961581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-López JA, Page MJ, Lipsey MW, Higgins JPT. Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Res Synth Methods. 2018;9(3):336–351. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley RD, Jackson D, Salanti G, et al. Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples. BMJ. 2017;358:j3932. doi:10.1136/bmj.j3932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson D, White IR, Riley RD. Multivariate meta-analysis. In: Handbook of Meta-Analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2020:163–186.
   Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36(3):1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Adamopoulos E, Vedhara K. Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of complex interventions: psychological interventions in coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(9):1158–1165. doi:10.1093/aje/kwp014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munder T, Brütsch O, Leonhart R, Gerger H, Barth J. Researcher allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: an overview of reviews. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(4):501–511. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guise JM, Chang C, Butler M, Viswanathan M, Tugwell P. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 1: an introduction to a series of articles that provide guidance and tools for reviews of complex interventions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;90:6–10. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar